Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OpenResty VS Puma

Compare OpenResty VS Puma and see what are their differences

OpenResty logo OpenResty

Turning Nginx into a Full-fledged Web App Server

Puma logo Puma

A concurrent web server for Ruby.
  • OpenResty Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-16
  • Puma Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-13

OpenResty videos

Why and how I built my CMS based on ArangoDB & openresty

More videos:

  • Review - OpenResty Edge 2 Admin Intro: Episode 3: Applications - Cache & Req Rewrite

Puma videos

The Ford Puma has an onboard foot SPA! REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - 2021 Ford Puma review – why it's the best new small SUV on sale | What Car?
  • Review - Ford Puma 2021 review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OpenResty and Puma)
Web And Application Servers
Web Servers
92 92%
8% 8
Application Server
91 91%
9% 9
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using OpenResty and Puma. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare OpenResty and Puma

OpenResty Reviews

We have no reviews of OpenResty yet.
Be the first one to post

Puma Reviews

Unicorn vs. Puma vs. Passenger: which app server is right for you?
There's a reason Puma is the default app server for newly generated Rails apps and on Heroku today: it's easy to configure and mostly "just works" out-of-the-box. It makes a lot of sense to start with Puma and evaluate Passenger as your app grows and needs more advanced features and configuration options.
Source: scoutapm.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OpenResty should be more popular than Puma. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OpenResty mentions (21)

  • Scriptable Operating Systems with Lua [pdf]
    It's maybe deprecated by the official Nginx support, but there are other projects and organizations that are offering Lua scripting with Nginx with all kinds of extensions and libraries. See OpenResty website[0] and Github repo[1]. [0] - https://openresty.org/en/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Ask HN: The C10M Problem
    Have you seen https://openresty.org/en/ before? To share a quote directly taken from their website: > By taking advantage of various well-designed Nginx modules (most of which are developed by the OpenResty team themselves), OpenResty® effectively turns the nginx server into a powerful web app server, in which the web developers can use the Lua programming language to script various existing nginx C modules and... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Show HN: Lockbox: forward proxy for making third party API calls
    Nginx is quite extendable, there are tons of nginx plugins to help you add more customizations. There is OpenResty, a version of nginx [0]. It allows you to script all sorts of stuff with Lua inside nginx itself. Tools like lockbox are not necessary, nginx, caddy, etc or heck even a normal 70 line python3 fastapi based script works just fine and should be more extendable than lockbox. [0](https://openresty.org/en/). - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Five Apache projects you probably didn't know about
    APISIX is an API Gateway. It builds upon OpenResty, a Lua layer built on top of the famous nginx reverse-proxy. APISIX adds abstractions to the mix, e.g., Route, Service, Upstream, and offers a plugin-based architecture. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Apache APISIX plugin priority, a leaky abstraction?
    Apache APISIX is an API Gateway, which builds upon the OpenResty reverse-proxy to offer a plugin-based architecture. The main benefit of such an architecture is that it brings structure to the configuration of routes. It's a help at scale, when managing hundreds or thousands of routes. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
View more

Puma mentions (3)

  • Breaking the 300 barrier
    As we use Puma as our webserver for our rails application, I quickly went to Puma's config file which typically resides in config/puma.rb. The config was set as. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • What's new in Ruby 3.1?
    One more thing - any top-of-mind examples of you squeezing more performance by making similar changes in the context of Puma? Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Coming back to Web/Ruby/Rails since 2012. Help?
    Welcome back. It's still the best choice in the Ruby world, well maintained, responsive and new features added. Shopify and github use it, you might want to look at the Rails 6 annoucements what these companies added for scalability features. There've been changes to the asset pipeline since version 3 but you'll still recognize it. You can run Rails as API-only and there's subprojects/tutorials for combining a... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OpenResty and Puma, you can also consider the following products

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Phusion Passenger - Phusion Passenger is a multi-language (Ruby, Python, Node) web & app server which can integrate into Apache and Nginx

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Unicorn - Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections.

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996