Puma
Phusion Passenger
Unicorn
LiteSpeed Web Server
Apache Tomcat
NGINX Unit
Gunicorn
OpenResty
Apache HTTP Server
Microsoft IIS
Apache Tomcat
XAMPP
LiteSpeed Web Server
MAMP
lighttpd
Forge
Apache HTTP ServerNo Apache HTTP Server videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Apache HTTP Server seems to be a lot more popular than Puma. While we know about 50 links to Apache HTTP Server, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Puma. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
As we use Puma as our webserver for our rails application, I quickly went to Puma's config file which typically resides in config/puma.rb. The config was set as. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
One more thing - any top-of-mind examples of you squeezing more performance by making similar changes in the context of Puma? Source: over 2 years ago
Welcome back. It's still the best choice in the Ruby world, well maintained, responsive and new features added. Shopify and github use it, you might want to look at the Rails 6 annoucements what these companies added for scalability features. There've been changes to the asset pipeline since version 3 but you'll still recognize it. You can run Rails as API-only and there's subprojects/tutorials for combining a... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Single-page applications (SPAs) existed before S3, but given that you still had to set up, scale, and maintain servers using something like Apache or NGINX in order to serve them, the advantages for “Ops” or “DevOps” were not so different to running a “real server” with a language like PHP, python, or Java. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Both Docusaurus and Starlight generate static sites. This means that theoretically, they can be deployed on any platform that supports deploying static sites (like Apache or NGINX). But both of them provide a significantly better developer experience if we deploy on their recommended platforms. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Simiplicity is nice, but there are reasons why Perl and PHP were the popular choices for web stacks in the early 2000's--they are faster and easier to develop with than C and likely safer than C too. Mod_perl (https://perl.apache.org/) and mod_php (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=115522403#content/view/115522403) helped to make Apache httpd (https://httpd.apache.org/) the... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
The Apache HTTP Server project was initially launched in 1995 by a group of web developers and administrators who sought to improve upon the existing web server software available at the time. The project has since evolved into a collaborative effort, with contributors from around the world working together to maintain and enhance the server. Today, the Apache HTTP Server is managed by the Apache Software... Source: about 1 year ago
Apache websites of friends and acquaintances. Source: about 1 year ago
Phusion Passenger - Phusion Passenger is a multi-language (Ruby, Python, Node) web & app server which can integrate into Apache and Nginx
Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows
Unicorn - Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections.
Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies
LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.
XAMPP - XAMPP is a free and open-source cross-platform web server that is primarily used when locally developing web applications.