OpenEBS

Website

openebs.io

$ Details

Categories

#Cloud Storage #Storage #Object Storage #Cloud Computing

rkt

Website

cloud.redhat.com

$ Details

-

Categories

#Cloud Storage #Storage #Developer Tools #Cloud Computing

OpenEBS features and specs

• Container-Native
  OpenEBS is built specifically for containerized environments, making it a great fit for Kubernetes. Its architecture allows it to integrate well, leveraging the distributed nature of Kubernetes.
• Polyglot Storage
  Allows users to choose different storage engines based on their needs. Users can select engines like Jiva, cStor, or Mayastor depending on performance and data protection requirements.
• Data Locality
  OpenEBS provides the feature of data locality, ensuring volumes are placed on the same node as the application consuming them, reducing latency, and improving performance.
• Flexibility and Scalability
  Designed to be easily deployed and managed in diverse cloud environments, allowing users to scale storage as their Kubernetes environment grows.
• Active Community
  Supported by a vibrant community and commercial backing from companies like MayaData, contributing to its continuous improvement and extensive documentation resources.

Possible disadvantages of OpenEBS

• Complexity in Setup
  Setting up OpenEBS initially can be complex for users unfamiliar with Kubernetes storage solutions, requiring a deep understanding of its components and configuration.
• Performance Overhead
  In some configurations, OpenEBS might introduce performance overhead due to additional abstraction layers, especially if not optimized properly for specific workloads.
• Limited Features Compared to Traditional Storage
  While OpenEBS is improving, it may still lack some advanced features compared to traditional storage solutions or newer storage platforms tailored for specific enterprise needs.
• Resource Consumption
  Each storage engine running in OpenEBS can consume significant cluster resources, which might impact other workloads if resources are not managed properly.

rkt features and specs

• Compatibility
  rkt supports the App Container (appc) spec and can also run Docker container images, providing flexibility and compatibility with various container formats.
• Security
  rkt is designed with security in mind, offering features like process isolation through Linux namespaces, user namespaces, and SELinux/AppArmor integration.
• Isolation
  rkt runs applications in their own stage1 environments, ensuring strong isolation between containers and better resource management.
• Modularity
  rkt is built with a modular architecture, allowing users to swap out the stage1 implementation to better fit their needs.
• Lightweight
  rkt avoids running a central daemon, thus using fewer system resources and simplifying debugging and monitoring.

Possible disadvantages of rkt

• Maturity
  rkt is not as mature as Docker, meaning it may lack some features and integrations that have been developed for Docker.
• Community and Ecosystem
  rkt has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Docker, which may limit the availability of third-party tools and support.
• Adoption
  rkt has lower adoption rates, leading to fewer tutorials, guides, and community-driven content, which can make the learning curve steeper.
• Development Activity
  rkt's development and maintenance activity is not as high as Docker's, which could impact long-term viability and feature development.
• Enterprise Support
  Enterprise-grade support and services for rkt may not be as widely available or comprehensive as those for Docker.

Analysis of rkt

OpenEBS 101: Hyperconverged Kubernetes Native Storage - Kiran Mova & Vishnu Itta, MayaData

More videos:

RKT IPO Review | Is Rocket a Buy for 2020? | Matt Mulvihill

More videos: