omg.lol VS Jekyll

omg.lol Reviews

Jekyll Reviews

omg.lol mentions (7)

• We Need to Rewild the Internet

  I personally am more interested in micro-hosting services like omg.lol[1]. I do self host a few services, but they are generally on VPNs that have smaller attack surfaces. I don't think it's practical for most individuals to maintain secure web servers, but I think most people can pay a very small amount of money to get most of the benefit. [1] https://home.omg.lol/. - Source: Hacker News / 23 days ago

• Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform

  Omg.lol (https://home.omg.lol/) has not been mentioned. You get quite a few nice bonuses from it (like community!) for a very reasonable, imo, $20USD a year. At least give it a look my friend! - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• Ask HN: I got the .com for my surname, best way to share this with family?

  I have a relatively uncommon surname, and I was eventually able to get the surname.com At this time, I have the most basic G Suite account using the domain name, so I can have myfirst@lastname.com, although I am not tied down to this. I just did it because after playing with proton, fastmail, and others, gmail was the most reliable email. If I want to share the opportunity to have firstname@lastname.com with my... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• Automating (and probably overengineering) my /now page

  Omg.lol (where I point my domain) and host most of my site content recently launched support for /now pages. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• epsilon.lol – help build the post-capitalist Internet

  Why is it so alike with https://omg.lol/ ? Source: over 1 year ago

Jekyll mentions (181)

• On the road to ramen profitability 🍜 💸

  A basic marketing site built-on Jekyll and hosted via Cloudflare Pages. - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago

• Creating excerpts in Astro

  This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

• JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview

  We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation

  In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• Ask HN: Looking for lightweight personal blogging platform

  In future, if you want to move from Jekyll to something else, you just have to worry about that `_posts` and `_assets` folder. They may have different naming convention but you can just config-managed it or change it to your choice. This is why I suggested owning that two yourself. You also may not worry about FrontMatter[3] (meta in the header) and its accompanying jazz by asking Jekyll to use the plugins... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago