Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Oatpp VS fish shell

Compare Oatpp VS fish shell and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Oatpp logo Oatpp

Zero-dependency, performance oriented Web Framework for Rapid development in C++

fish shell logo fish shell

The friendly interactive shell.
  • Oatpp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-18
  • fish shell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-23

Oatpp features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Oat++ is designed to be light and efficient, which makes it suitable for developing high-performance applications with minimal resource usage.
  • Simple API
    The framework offers a simple and declarative API, allowing developers to build REST APIs quickly and efficiently without dealing with complex boilerplate code.
  • High Performance
    Oat++ provides high-speed processing and low-latency capabilities, which are essential for demanding web service applications.
  • Modular Architecture
    The framework's modular design allows developers to use only the components they need, making it flexible and adaptable to various use cases.
  • Cross-Platform
    Oat++ supports multiple platforms, enabling the development of applications that can run on different operating systems without significant code changes.

Possible disadvantages of Oatpp

  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more mature frameworks, Oat++ has a smaller community and ecosystem, which might limit the availability of plugins and third-party libraries.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers not familiar with C++ or its modern features, there might be a steeper learning curve to effectively use Oat++.
  • Less Documentation
    The documentation, while improving, may not be as comprehensive as other more established frameworks, potentially posing challenges for new users.
  • Less Popular
    As a relatively less popular framework, finding community support or solutions to specific problems might be more difficult than with more widely-used tools.
  • Feature Limitations
    While sufficient for many use cases, Oat++ may lack some advanced features out-of-the-box compared to larger, more complex frameworks.

fish shell features and specs

  • User-Friendly Syntax
    Fish shell features a more readable and user-friendly syntax compared to traditional shells like Bash or Zsh, making it easier for new users to learn and use.
  • Modern Features
    Fish shell includes out-of-the-box support for modern shell features such as syntax highlighting, autosuggestions, and smart command-line completions, greatly enhancing the user experience.
  • Web-Based Configuration
    Users can configure Fish shell through a web interface, making it more accessible and easier to customize compared to other shells that require manual configuration file edits.
  • Consistent Scripting
    Fish shell uses a consistent scripting language, which reduces the quirks and peculiarities often found in other shell scripting languages.

Possible disadvantages of fish shell

  • Compatibility Issues
    Fish shell is not POSIX compliant, which means scripts written in Fish will not be compatible with other POSIX-compliant shells like Bash or Zsh, potentially causing issues in environments that rely on such standards.
  • Smaller Ecosystem
    Compared to shells like Bash and Zsh, Fish has a smaller ecosystem of plugins, themes, and community support, which could limit available resources and tools.
  • Learning Curve for Experienced Users
    Experienced users of traditional shells like Bash or Zsh might find Fish's different syntax and features take some time to adapt to, potentially reducing initial productivity.
  • Limited Script Portability
    Scripts written in Fish shell are often not portable to other shell environments without significant modification, reducing their usability in multi-shell setups.

Analysis of fish shell

Overall verdict

  • Fish Shell is a highly regarded shell due to its modern features, ease of use, and ability to improve productivity for both beginners and experienced users. Its emphasis on user experience and efficient workflows makes it a popular choice.

Why this product is good

  • Fish Shell is known for its user-friendly design, syntax highlighting, and autosuggestions which enhance the command-line experience. Unlike other shells, it has out-of-the-box configurations that are easy to use, reducing the need for manual setup. The inclusion of advanced tab completions, web-based configuration, and a helpful scripting language also contribute to its appeal.

Recommended for

    Fish Shell is recommended for developers and system administrators looking for an intuitive and powerful command-line shell. It is particularly suitable for users who prefer minimal configuration and appreciate features like autosuggestions and syntax highlighting straight out of the box.

Oatpp videos

No Oatpp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

fish shell videos

this tank is not overstocked | Fish Tank Review Ep. 1

More videos:

  • Review - Can Female Bettas Live In A Bowl Together? | Fish Tank Review 36
  • Review - Ryan's First Time Catching Fish for Dinner!!!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Oatpp and fish shell)
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0
Cryptocurrencies
0 0%
100% 100
IDE
100 100%
0% 0
Blockchain
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Oatpp and fish shell. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, fish shell seems to be a lot more popular than Oatpp. While we know about 134 links to fish shell, we've tracked only 6 mentions of Oatpp. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Oatpp mentions (6)

  • Serving Static Files and Single Page Applications on Oat++ (OatPP)
    Oat++(OatPP) is a lightweight C++ Web framework. Out of the box, it provides REST API with built-in JSON serialization/deserialization features, which could be interfaced with your DTOs. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Installing and Using The OatPP (Oat++) Library
    OatPP(Oat++) is an open-source lightweight C++ Web Framework. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • What isn't cpp used on web servers as much as other languages?
    With the right libraries, C++ could be a good fit for applications that want to expose a fast web API to things that need lots of compute (simulators, for instance) or I/O (interactive editing of large datasets). Projects like Oat++ and Crow give me hope that we might see such an ecosystem develop. Source: about 2 years ago
  • How to use C++ as the backend for web dev?
    Maybe use something like https://oatpp.io to create a REST API: C++ in the backend with this library to create a REST server, and the JavaScript/TypeScript frontend to ask for the information. Source: about 3 years ago
  • learning c++: looking for structured project tutorial (web app/api? or other?)
    As for your web problem, I have only used https://oatpp.io/ in the past but I'm sure there are more frameworks like that on the internet. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

fish shell mentions (134)

  • A short tutorial on using fish shell.
    Follow this to install. Note that this tutorial assume that you are on Linux. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Tools for 2025
    I've probably been using fish shell [0] for close to 10 years now. When I need POSIX compliance or if I need to run a one-off bash command, I just call bash. It's exceedingly rare. Browsing through the documentation for Oils, it seems to be organized in a way that's very confusing. When you open the fish shell website it was two clear buttons for Tutorial and Documentation. [0] https://fishshell.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • TIL: Ghostty — a new and quite promising terminal emulator
    I remember that Julia Evans, whose blog I follow, mentioned a few time that she uses Fish. Also, some days ago I came across this post about Fish rewrite to Rust from C++, which sounds like a cool thing to do. However, I tried it some time ago, and while pretty neat, I wasn't convinced to switch to it completely. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Easy development environments with Nix and Nix flakes!
    The default shell in the above flake adds Valkey, NodeJS 22, the PNPM package manager, and the fish shell to the environment. It also starts Valkey in the background through a shell hook, passing it a custom config (declared via Nix!) and runs fish so we're dropped in the fish shell instead of our login shell. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • A new shell for using modern Unix commands
    I’m testing a new shell called fish, and I’m enjoying some features that truly make it a friendly interactive shell. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Oatpp and fish shell, you can also consider the following products

Cutelyst - Qt-based web framework using the elegant approach of Catalyst framework

zsh - The Z shell (Zsh) is a Unix shell that can be used as an interactive login shell and as a powerful command interpreter for shell scripting.

Crow - A Fast and Easy to use microframework for the web.

GNU Bourne Again SHell - Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, that will appear in the GNU operating system.

Crow framework - C++ micro web framework inspired by Python Flask

Starship (Shell Prompt) - Starship is the minimal, blazing fast, and extremely customizable prompt for any shell! Shows the information you need, while staying sleek and minimal. Quick installation available for Bash, Fish, ZSH, Ion, and Powershell.