Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Crow VS fish shell

Compare Crow VS fish shell and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Crow logo Crow

A Fast and Easy to use microframework for the web.

fish shell logo fish shell

The friendly interactive shell.
  • Crow Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-03
  • fish shell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-23

Crow features and specs

  • Asynchronous Handling
    Crow supports asynchronous request handling, allowing for efficient management of high numbers of simultaneous connections.
  • Modern C++ Standards
    Utilizes modern C++ features to ensure robust and efficient performance, leveraging C++11 and newer standards.
  • Simple and Lightweight
    Designed to provide a web application framework with simplicity and minimal resource usage, making it suitable for embedded systems.
  • JSON Parsing
    Includes built-in support for parsing and handling JSON, making it easier to work with web APIs and RESTful services.
  • Routing
    Offers flexible routing capabilities, allowing for easy mapping of URLs to handlers with path parameters and regular expressions.

Possible disadvantages of Crow

  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more established frameworks, Crow has a smaller community and fewer third-party libraries and tools available.
  • Learning Curve
    Requires familiarity with modern C++ features, which might be challenging for developers not well-versed in these standards.
  • Lack of Comprehensive Documentation
    The documentation may not be as extensive or detailed as other frameworks, potentially making it harder to troubleshoot or learn advanced features.
  • Scalability
    While suitable for many use cases, it might not be the best choice for very large-scale applications requiring extensive middleware functionality.

fish shell features and specs

  • User-Friendly Syntax
    Fish shell features a more readable and user-friendly syntax compared to traditional shells like Bash or Zsh, making it easier for new users to learn and use.
  • Modern Features
    Fish shell includes out-of-the-box support for modern shell features such as syntax highlighting, autosuggestions, and smart command-line completions, greatly enhancing the user experience.
  • Web-Based Configuration
    Users can configure Fish shell through a web interface, making it more accessible and easier to customize compared to other shells that require manual configuration file edits.
  • Consistent Scripting
    Fish shell uses a consistent scripting language, which reduces the quirks and peculiarities often found in other shell scripting languages.

Possible disadvantages of fish shell

  • Compatibility Issues
    Fish shell is not POSIX compliant, which means scripts written in Fish will not be compatible with other POSIX-compliant shells like Bash or Zsh, potentially causing issues in environments that rely on such standards.
  • Smaller Ecosystem
    Compared to shells like Bash and Zsh, Fish has a smaller ecosystem of plugins, themes, and community support, which could limit available resources and tools.
  • Learning Curve for Experienced Users
    Experienced users of traditional shells like Bash or Zsh might find Fish's different syntax and features take some time to adapt to, potentially reducing initial productivity.
  • Limited Script Portability
    Scripts written in Fish shell are often not portable to other shell environments without significant modification, reducing their usability in multi-shell setups.

Analysis of fish shell

Overall verdict

  • Fish Shell is a highly regarded shell due to its modern features, ease of use, and ability to improve productivity for both beginners and experienced users. Its emphasis on user experience and efficient workflows makes it a popular choice.

Why this product is good

  • Fish Shell is known for its user-friendly design, syntax highlighting, and autosuggestions which enhance the command-line experience. Unlike other shells, it has out-of-the-box configurations that are easy to use, reducing the need for manual setup. The inclusion of advanced tab completions, web-based configuration, and a helpful scripting language also contribute to its appeal.

Recommended for

    Fish Shell is recommended for developers and system administrators looking for an intuitive and powerful command-line shell. It is particularly suitable for users who prefer minimal configuration and appreciate features like autosuggestions and syntax highlighting straight out of the box.

Crow videos

The Crow (1994) - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - The Crow (1994) Retrospective / Review
  • Review - Siskel & Ebert Review The Crow

fish shell videos

this tank is not overstocked | Fish Tank Review Ep. 1

More videos:

  • Review - Can Female Bettas Live In A Bowl Together? | Fish Tank Review 36
  • Review - Ryan's First Time Catching Fish for Dinner!!!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Crow and fish shell)
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Cryptocurrencies
0 0%
100% 100
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0
Blockchain
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Crow and fish shell. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, fish shell seems to be a lot more popular than Crow. While we know about 134 links to fish shell, we've tracked only 12 mentions of Crow. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Crow mentions (12)

  • Transport agnostic Websocket library
    I recommend Crow, it's a web framework that supports HTTP and Websockets. It's a bit larger than being only there to just let you compose or decode a packet. But I'm pretty sure everything you mentioned is there already :). Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Can I use C++ in the backend ?? Any frameworks there ??
    I've been working on Crow for quite a while now, it's a pretty cool framework IMO. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • making a web server in c++?
    If you really want to use C++, check out something like Crow, https://crowcpp.org/ and same thing, you can pass messages between the server and your application. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Crow finally gets rid of `CROW_MAIN` macro
    Crow is a C++ web framework being developed and maintained by myself and a couple developers. Source: over 3 years ago
  • C or C++ as web app backend?
    Https://crowcpp.org/ (C++ API similar to Python flask). Source: over 3 years ago
View more

fish shell mentions (134)

  • A short tutorial on using fish shell.
    Follow this to install. Note that this tutorial assume that you are on Linux. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Tools for 2025
    I've probably been using fish shell [0] for close to 10 years now. When I need POSIX compliance or if I need to run a one-off bash command, I just call bash. It's exceedingly rare. Browsing through the documentation for Oils, it seems to be organized in a way that's very confusing. When you open the fish shell website it was two clear buttons for Tutorial and Documentation. [0] https://fishshell.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • TIL: Ghostty — a new and quite promising terminal emulator
    I remember that Julia Evans, whose blog I follow, mentioned a few time that she uses Fish. Also, some days ago I came across this post about Fish rewrite to Rust from C++, which sounds like a cool thing to do. However, I tried it some time ago, and while pretty neat, I wasn't convinced to switch to it completely. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Easy development environments with Nix and Nix flakes!
    The default shell in the above flake adds Valkey, NodeJS 22, the PNPM package manager, and the fish shell to the environment. It also starts Valkey in the background through a shell hook, passing it a custom config (declared via Nix!) and runs fish so we're dropped in the fish shell instead of our login shell. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • A new shell for using modern Unix commands
    I’m testing a new shell called fish, and I’m enjoying some features that truly make it a friendly interactive shell. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Crow and fish shell, you can also consider the following products

Oatpp - Zero-dependency, performance oriented Web Framework for Rapid development in C++

zsh - The Z shell (Zsh) is a Unix shell that can be used as an interactive login shell and as a powerful command interpreter for shell scripting.

Cutelyst - Qt-based web framework using the elegant approach of Catalyst framework

GNU Bourne Again SHell - Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, that will appear in the GNU operating system.

Robin - Add interaction to your product with few lines of code.

Starship (Shell Prompt) - Starship is the minimal, blazing fast, and extremely customizable prompt for any shell! Shows the information you need, while staying sleek and minimal. Quick installation available for Bash, Fish, ZSH, Ion, and Powershell.