Software Alternatives & Reviews

NGINX Unit VS Puma

Compare NGINX Unit VS Puma and see what are their differences

NGINX Unit logo NGINX Unit

A dynamic web and application server with Go, PHP, Python, Perl, and Ruby support.

Puma logo Puma

A concurrent web server for Ruby.
  • NGINX Unit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-07
  • Puma Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-13

NGINX Unit videos

NGINX Unit Demo (2019)

More videos:

  • Review - Reading the NGINX Unit Changelog Together

Puma videos

The Ford Puma has an onboard foot SPA! REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - 2021 Ford Puma review – why it's the best new small SUV on sale | What Car?
  • Review - Ford Puma 2021 review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NGINX Unit and Puma)
Web And Application Servers
Application Server
55 55%
45% 45
Web Servers
51 51%
49% 49
SSH
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using NGINX Unit and Puma. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare NGINX Unit and Puma

NGINX Unit Reviews

We have no reviews of NGINX Unit yet.
Be the first one to post

Puma Reviews

Unicorn vs. Puma vs. Passenger: which app server is right for you?
There's a reason Puma is the default app server for newly generated Rails apps and on Heroku today: it's easy to configure and mostly "just works" out-of-the-box. It makes a lot of sense to start with Puma and evaluate Passenger as your app grows and needs more advanced features and configuration options.
Source: scoutapm.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Puma seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NGINX Unit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of NGINX Unit yet. Tracking of NGINX Unit recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Puma mentions (3)

  • Breaking the 300 barrier
    As we use Puma as our webserver for our rails application, I quickly went to Puma's config file which typically resides in config/puma.rb. The config was set as. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • What's new in Ruby 3.1?
    One more thing - any top-of-mind examples of you squeezing more performance by making similar changes in the context of Puma? Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ask HN: Coming back to Web/Ruby/Rails since 2012. Help?
    Welcome back. It's still the best choice in the Ruby world, well maintained, responsive and new features added. Shopify and github use it, you might want to look at the Rails 6 annoucements what these companies added for scalability features. There've been changes to the asset pipeline since version 3 but you'll still recognize it. You can run Rails as API-only and there's subprojects/tutorials for combining a... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NGINX Unit and Puma, you can also consider the following products

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Phusion Passenger - Phusion Passenger is a multi-language (Ruby, Python, Node) web & app server which can integrate into Apache and Nginx

Shell In A Box - Shell In A Box is a web based AJAX terminal emulator that can export arbitrary command line tools...

Unicorn - Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections.

Bastillion - Bastillion is an open-source web-based SSH console that centrally manages administrative access to systems.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.