Software Alternatives & Reviews

NANO VS Yi

Compare NANO VS Yi and see what are their differences

NANO logo NANO

Nano is digital money for the modern world. Try out a fee-less, eco-friendly and instant currency that is easy to use, accept and integrate with.

Yi logo Yi

$80 action camera from Xiaomi
  • NANO Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-04
  • Yi Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-11

NANO videos

Reebok Nano X Review

More videos:

  • Review - Tata Nano GenX Twist XTA 2018 | Real-life review
  • Review - Tata Nano Review - CNG Kicked In Yo | Faisal Khan

Yi videos

YI Outdoor Security Camera Review

More videos:

  • Review - Reviewing the CHEAPEST Home Security Camera on Amazon! $30 Yi Home Camera!
  • Review - Yi Home Security Camera Review and Set Up

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NANO and Yi)
Text Editors
78 78%
22% 22
IDE
79 79%
21% 21
Cryptocurrencies
100 100%
0% 0
Software Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using NANO and Yi. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NANO seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 133 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NANO mentions (133)

  • Crypto Had Its Chance
    Nano has been around for years now, instant, feeless transfers. Its useful, but nobody is using it. It gets spam attacked every bull run as well which suggests certain influences dont want it to ever take off. https://nano.org/en. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • [Winner's Thread # 86] Restored Faith in Humanity! Thank you!
    Hi /u/oroscor1! Congratulations! Can you make a Nano (https://nano.org/en) wallet so I can send you some coin? By using Nano we can avoid the high transaction fees of BitCoin and PayPal. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Can a 51% attack allow attackers to “steal the identity” of a wallet and spoof the sender of a transaction?
    Nano’s network is validated through a Open Representative Voting (ORV) consensus mechanism. They have fallen victim to a 51% attack in the last and attackers were able to double spend funds. Is it possible for this same attack to allow the sender address of a transaction to be spoofed? Source: over 1 year ago
  • ELI5: Why wouldn’t a universal currency work?
    There’s a better decentralised digital currency now called Nano that aims to be a borderless, permissionless currency for the unbanked masses. Source: over 1 year ago
  • NANO: A Complete Project Overview
    Nano is a blockchain with an acyclic structure and, thus, high throughput. Developer Colin LeMahieu launched the project in 2014, and it was initially called RaiBlocks, but in 2018 it became NANO. The project's main goal was to initiate a massive adoption of NANO everywhere as a paying method without using smart contracts and dApps built upon them. The team wanted to get rid of other blockchains' drawbacks. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

Yi mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Yi yet. Tracking of Yi recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NANO and Yi, you can also consider the following products

Adguard AdBlocker - Adguard AdBlocker browser extension, see review on Medium.

Textadept - Textadept is a cross-platform text editor that runs on different types of platforms, that allows to control over the application using Lua programming language.

Mousepad - Lighweight text editor for Xfce

Kakoune - Vim inspired — Faster as in less keystrokes — Multiple selections — Orthogonal design

Xed - A text editor forked from Pluma and Gedit. Xed is the default text editor of Linux Mint.

Atom - At GitHub, we’re building the text editor we’ve always wanted: hackable to the core, but approachable on the first day without ever touching a config file. We can’t wait to see what you build with it.