Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
EJS

NANO – jQuery Template Engine VS EJS

Compare NANO – jQuery Template Engine VS EJS and see what are their differences

Unimus
Unimus is a Network Automation and Configuration management (NCM) solution designed for fast deployment network-wide and ease of use. Unimus does not require learning any abstraction or templating languages, and does not require any coding skills. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

NANO – jQuery Template Engine logo NANO – jQuery Template Engine

NANO is a simple and open-source jQuery Template Engine developed by trix.pl and released under the MIT License.

EJS logo EJS

An open source JavaScript Template library.
Not present
  • EJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-11

NANO – jQuery Template Engine features and specs

  • Lightweight
    NANO is a very lightweight library, which means it doesn't add significant overhead to your project, resulting in faster load times and better performance.
  • Easy to Integrate
    NANO can be easily integrated into projects that already use jQuery, making it a convenient choice for developers familiar with jQuery.
  • Simple Syntax
    The syntax used in NANO is straightforward and easy to understand, which simplifies the process of creating and rendering templates.
  • Minimal Dependencies
    It requires jQuery, which many projects already use, reducing the need to manage additional dependencies.

Possible disadvantages of NANO – jQuery Template Engine

  • Limited Features
    Compared to other template engines, NANO offers a limited feature set, which might not be sufficient for complex templating needs.
  • JQuery Dependency
    NANO relies on jQuery, which is less popular in modern JavaScript development, potentially introducing compatibility issues with newer frameworks.
  • Lack of Community Support
    Being a less popular template engine, NANO may have limited community support and fewer resources available for troubleshooting and enhancements.
  • Outdated
    With the rise of modern JavaScript frameworks like React and Vue.js, jQuery-based tools like NANO may be considered outdated for new projects.

EJS features and specs

  • Simplicity
    EJS is easy to learn and use, especially for developers who are already familiar with JavaScript. The syntax is straightforward, making it a good choice for quick application development.
  • JavaScript Integration
    Since EJS templates are JavaScript files, you can seamlessly integrate JavaScript code, making it easy to manipulate data and use familiar JavaScript functions.
  • Lightweight
    EJS is a lightweight template engine, which makes it an optimal choice for applications where performance and simplicity are critical.
  • Flexibility
    Allows for the embedding of plain JavaScript within the templates, giving developers the flexibility to add logic directly in their HTML.
  • Partial Templates
    Supports partials, which help to reuse code snippets across different views, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    Supports server-side rendering, which can improve performance by reducing the amount of client-side processing needed.

Possible disadvantages of EJS

  • Limited Functionality
    Compared to more feature-rich template engines like Handlebars or Pug, EJS offers limited functionalities which might be a drawback for large, complex projects.
  • Debugging
    Debugging EJS templates can sometimes be challenging. Errors within templates can often be vague, making it difficult to trace the root cause.
  • Maintenance
    Embedding a lot of JavaScript within templates can make the code harder to read and maintain, especially as the complexity of the application grows.
  • Performance Overhead
    For very large and complex templates, EJS can introduce a performance overhead compared to more optimized template engines designed for high performance.
  • Community and Support
    While EJS has a reasonable user base, the community and support may not be as extensive as more popular alternatives like React or Vue.js.

NANO – jQuery Template Engine videos

No NANO – jQuery Template Engine videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

EJS videos

+ Add

Kane Creek - Bestop Trail Review at EJS 2019

More videos:

  • Tutorial - JavaScript Templating Tutorial | Introduction To EJS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NANO – jQuery Template Engine and EJS)

NANO – jQuery Template Engine

EJS

Tool
100 100%
Tool
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
29 29%
Javascript UI Libraries
71% 71
Development
37 37%
Development
63% 63
Front-End Frameworks
0 0%
Front-End Frameworks
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using NANO – jQuery Template Engine and EJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, EJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NANO – jQuery Template Engine mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of NANO – jQuery Template Engine yet. Tracking of NANO – jQuery Template Engine recommendations started around Oct 2021.

EJS mentions (26)

  • Next.js vs Express: What to Choose in 2025?
    Express does not provide SEO benefits by default and would require additional configuration with tools like EJS (Embedded JavaScript) or Handlebars for server-side rendering. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Chapter 7: HTML part two
    For a more robust approach, we'd probably need to install a templating language of some kind, such as Twig, EJS, Handlebars, Pug or Mustache (this is not a complete list!). Reading the documentation for posthtml-modules, you'll notice it doesn't mention package.json or any of the approaches we've used in this guide. Instead, the examples are in JavaScript and we've advised to add this to our Node application. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Web Components and SSR - 2024 Edition
    Server-side Framework SSR is when you use a framework that runs the HTML templating logic entirely on the server to compose the HTML that will be rendered in the browser. These are frameworks like Ruby on Rails, ASP.Net, PHP, or even Node.js frameworks that use templating languages like Pug or EJS. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • How to Build an Application With Node.js
    We need a templating engine to render HTML code in the browser using Node.js. We'll use ejs (Embedded JavaScript) for this tutorial but there are others such as Pug (formerly known as Jade) and Express Handlebar, which also render HTML on the server. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Getting to the meat and potatoes of serverless recipe parsing with Amazon Bedrock
    The tags is where you put the HTML you want Claude to read. The <%- document %> contained within is an ejs placeholder. More on this shortly. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NANO – jQuery Template Engine and EJS, you can also consider the following products

jquery-template - A template plugin for jQuery. Allows templating without cluttering JavaScript code with markup.

Handlebars - Handlebars is a JavaScript template library that is, more or less, based on ...

Jinja2 - Jinja2 is a template engine written in Python.

Mustache.js - Minimal templating with {{mustaches}} in JavaScript - janl/mustache.js

Pug - Pug is a robust, elegant, feature rich template engine for Node.js

Vue.js - Reactive Components for Modern Web Interfaces

Loading...