Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

NakedSSL VS HTTP

Compare NakedSSL VS HTTP and see what are their differences

NakedSSL logo NakedSSL

Hassle-free SSL clothes for your naked domains.

HTTP logo HTTP

is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.
  • NakedSSL Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-03-20

NakedSSL is the easiest way to create 301 redirects from your naked domain to your www domain — even with SSL.

  • HTTP Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-21

NakedSSL features and specs

  • Redirect naked domains: Yes

HTTP features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NakedSSL and HTTP)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers
SSL Certificates
100 100%
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using NakedSSL and HTTP. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare NakedSSL and HTTP

NakedSSL Reviews

  1. As simple as it can get

    I was very hesitant at the beginning, as we would use the service for our customers as well. After using it with the free plan for a couple of months we decided to give it a try with our customers – and I have to say that it just works as expected.

    👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Easy user interface|Free basic plan|Quick|Funny|Simple pricing|High uptime|Reliable
    👎 Cons:    No sla|Slow support for free customers|Only 1 domain for free

HTTP Reviews

We have no reviews of HTTP yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, HTTP seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NakedSSL mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of NakedSSL yet. Tracking of NakedSSL recommendations started around Mar 2021.

HTTP mentions (7)

  • Evolving the Web: Discovering the History of HTTP Versions
    HTTP/1.1 was such a game changer for the Internet that it works so well that even through two revisions, RFC 2616 published in June 1999 and RFC 7230– RFC 7235 published in June 2014, HTTP/1.1 was extremely stable until the release of HTTP/2.0 in 2014 — Nearly 18 years later. Before continuing to the next section about HTTP/2.0, let us revisit what journey HTTP/1.1 has been through. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Poll: Are client web requests sent to upstream servers or downstream servers?
    On the one hand, it just seems natural that "upstream" refers to the inbound request being sent from one system to another. It takes effort (connection pooling, throttling, retries, etc.) to make a request to an (upstream) dependency, just as it takes effort to swim upstream. The response is (usually) easy... Just return it... hence, "downstream". Recall the usual meaning of "upload" and "download". Upstream seems... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • How to cache TCP, SSL handshake on ALB?
    To me it sounds like you’ve not solved this as the config you’ve mentioned is about preventing “illegal” (none RFC7230 ) requests, it isn’t really related to the problem you posted. Source: over 2 years ago
  • HTTP Protocol Overview
    The program you are using to send data to the server may or may not automatically determine the right content-type header for your data, and knowing how to set and check headers is an essential skill. To learn more about the HTTP protocol check out the MDN guide or read the official standard, RFC 7230. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Show HN: Micro HTTP server in 22 lines of C
    It's neat, but I don't believe it is a compliant implementation of HTTP/1.1 (or 1.0). For example, it does not handle percent-encoded characters in the request URI.[1][2] [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7230#section-3.1.1 [2]: https://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.0/spec.html#Request-URI. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NakedSSL and HTTP, you can also consider the following products

redirect.pizza - Get peace of mind when redirecting your domains without the burden of hosting them. We handle the redirect process with full HTTPS support and API compatibility. Enter your domain names and we'll take care of the rest.

mini_httpd - mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.

EasyRedir - URL redirect service for business, marketing and SEO.

thttpd - thttpd is a simple, small, portable, fast, and secure HTTP server.

SSL Alerts - Free service to send SSL certificate expiration alerts

micro_httpd - micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.