Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

TamoSoft Throughput Test VS mtr

Compare TamoSoft Throughput Test VS mtr and see what are their differences

TamoSoft Throughput Test logo TamoSoft Throughput Test

TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.

mtr logo mtr

mtr combines the functionality of the 'traceroute' and 'ping' programs in a single...
  • TamoSoft Throughput Test Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-27
  • mtr Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-22

TamoSoft Throughput Test features and specs

  • Comprehensive Testing
    TamoSoft Throughput Test provides a detailed analysis of network performance, including metrics for UDP and TCP throughput, latency, jitter, and packet loss.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    The tool is available for both Windows and macOS, making it versatile for users with different operating systems.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    It features an intuitive interface that allows users to easily configure the testing parameters and understand the results.
  • Real-Time Graphical Results
    Provides real-time graphical display of test results which helps in the quick analysis of network performance.
  • Free of Charge
    TamoSoft Throughput Test is free to use, which makes it accessible to a wide range of users without financial constraints.

Possible disadvantages of TamoSoft Throughput Test

  • Limited to Local Network Testing
    The tool is primarily designed for LAN and WLAN performance testing, which may not be suitable for WAN or internet speed tests.
  • Dependency on Available Hardware
    The accuracy of the tool depends on the quality and capabilities of the network hardware being used for testing.
  • Potential Complexity in Advanced Configurations
    While the basic setup is straightforward, users requiring advanced configurations might find it complex without adequate networking knowledge.
  • No Mobile Version
    There is no mobile version of the application, which limits its usability for testing on mobile devices.

mtr features and specs

  • Real-time Network Diagnostics
    MTR (My Traceroute) provides real-time statistics on the network path, including packet loss and latency, which helps in diagnosing network issues promptly.
  • Combination of Ping and Traceroute
    MTR combines the functionalities of both ping and traceroute, allowing for comprehensive analysis by showing the route and performance metrics for each hop along the path.
  • Continuous Monitoring
    Unlike traditional traceroute that runs once, MTR continuously sends packets, providing ongoing updates on the network status, which helps in identifying intermittent issues.
  • Visualization Options
    MTR includes both console-based and GUI-based interfaces, catering to different user preferences and making it easier to visualize the network performance.
  • Cross-Platform Availability
    MTR is available on multiple operating systems including Linux, BSD variants, and macOS, ensuring that it can be used in various environments.

Possible disadvantages of mtr

  • Potential Overhead
    Continuous monitoring by MTR can add network overhead, especially in congested networks, possibly impacting performance.
  • Security Concerns
    Using MTR might pose security risks, as it continuously sends packets to remote hosts. This can be exploited to perform network reconnaissance or be flagged by security systems.
  • Requires Administrative Privileges
    Running MTR typically requires administrative or root privileges, which may not be available in all environments or may pose security risks if improperly managed.
  • Limited Network Layer Support
    MTR primarily functions at the IP layer and might not provide insights into application-specific issues or issues at different OSI layers, limiting its diagnostic capabilities for complex problems.
  • Dependency on External Conditions
    The accuracy and usefulness of MTR reports can be affected by variables like network congestion, traffic shaping, and firewall rules, which can lead to misleading conclusions about network health.

Analysis of mtr

Overall verdict

  • Yes, mtr (from bitwizard.nl) is generally considered a useful tool.

Why this product is good

  • MTR (My Traceroute) combines the functionality of the traceroute and ping programs in a single network diagnostic tool. It allows users to diagnose network connections by providing real-time analysis of the network route taken to reach a target server. Its ability to provide detailed insights into network performance makes it particularly valuable for identifying issues such as latency, packet loss, and routing problems.

Recommended for

  • Network administrators looking to troubleshoot and diagnose network connectivity issues.
  • IT professionals who need to perform detailed network performance analysis.
  • Individuals wanting a comprehensive tool to monitor network path reliability.

TamoSoft Throughput Test videos

No TamoSoft Throughput Test videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

mtr videos

35" Goodyear MTR Tire Review | Jeep TJ

More videos:

  • Review - Exploring Traditions & Tasting the VEGETARIAN LUNCH THALI At Mavalli Tiffin Rooms | MTR | Bangalore
  • Review - CZ MTR 457 MATCH .22LR first impressions review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TamoSoft Throughput Test and mtr)
Monitoring Tools
69 69%
31% 31
IP Data
0 0%
100% 100
Network & Admin
49 49%
51% 51
Log Management
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using TamoSoft Throughput Test and mtr. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, mtr seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

TamoSoft Throughput Test mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of TamoSoft Throughput Test yet. Tracking of TamoSoft Throughput Test recommendations started around Mar 2021.

mtr mentions (1)

  • Show HN: How did YOUR computer reach my server?
    Interesting, I didn't know traceroute used UDP by default. Just did some testing with the best traceroute tool, mtr[0], and using the -u flag for UDP seemed to give the worst results. -t for TCP seemed OK. I never thought about the difference between how TCP and ICMP packets are handled. [0] https://bitwizard.nl/mtr/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TamoSoft Throughput Test and mtr, you can also consider the following products

iperf - A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

ipinfo.io - Simple IP address information.

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

ipgeolocation.io - Free IP Geolocation API and Accurate GeoIP Lookup Location Database

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...

ipwhois.io - ipwhois.io is an API that provides a users location (country, region, city, currency, currency symbol etc) based on their IP address. Get the accurate location information with our IP Lookup API and IP Location Database for any IP address.