Mockito

Website

site.mockito.org

$ Details

Categories

#Testing #Browser Testing #Automated Testing #Website Testing

Capybara

Website

github.com

$ Details

-

Categories

#Testing #Automated Testing #Browser Testing #Website Testing

Mockito features and specs

• Ease of Use
  Mockito provides a clean and simple API that makes it easy to create mock objects and set expectations on them, which reduces the learning curve for new users.
• Flexible Stubbing
  Allows defining behavior for mock objects, including different outcomes for different inputs, which provides detailed control over the mocked behavior.
• Enhanced Readability
  The use of clear, human-readable language in test cases helps improve the clarity and maintainability of tests.
• Integration with JUnit
  Mockito integrates seamlessly with JUnit, a popular testing framework, leveraging annotations and runners for cleaner and more structured test code.
• Active Community and Support
  Backed by a large and active user community, ensuring constant updates, improvements, and plentiful resources for troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Mockito

• Limited Deep Mocking
  Mockito can struggle with deep mocking scenarios where you need to mock chained or deeply nested calls, which can add complexity to test setup.
• Static Method Limitations
  Mockito does not natively support mocking of static methods, requiring additional tools or alternative approaches to handle such cases.
• Potential Overuse
  Extensive use of mocking might indicate poor design choices, such as tight coupling, and can lead to fragile tests that require significant maintenance.
• Requires Understanding of Best Practices
  Without understanding or adhering to best practices, developers might misuse Mockito, leading to over-mocking or inappropriate test setups.
• Advanced Features Require Careful Use
  Advanced features such as answers, spies, or argument captors can increase test complexity and require a deeper understanding to avoid introducing flaky tests.

Capybara features and specs

• Robustness
  Capybara provides a robust framework for testing web applications. It offers a natural way to simulate how a user would interact with your app, making it highly efficient for end-to-end testing.
• DSL
  Capybara's Domain Specific Language (DSL) is expressive and easy to understand, making test scripts straightforward to write and maintain, even for those who may not be deeply familiar with Ruby.
• Integration
  Capybara easily integrates with Ruby on Rails applications and is designed to work seamlessly with testing frameworks like RSpec and Cucumber, providing flexibility in testing suite setup.
• Multiple Drivers Support
  Capybara supports multiple drivers, allowing tests to be run in different browsers, which aids in cross-browser testing.
• Asynchronous Operations
  Capybara has built-in support for dealing with asynchronous web applications, which makes it suitable for testing modern web applications with dynamic content updates.

Possible disadvantages of Capybara

• Performance
  Tests written in Capybara can be slower compared to unit tests because they involve spinning up a web driver and interacting with the web application like a real user.
• Complex Setup
  Initial configuration and setup can be complex, especially for those who are not familiar with Ruby or the specific testing environments needed for Capybara.
• Limited to Ruby
  Capybara is a tool primarily for Ruby applications, which limits its usability for projects written in other languages unless you employ language bridge solutions.
• Debugging Challenges
  Debugging failures in Capybara tests can sometimes be difficult, as the errors may often be related to timing issues or element invisibility rather than logic errors.
• Maintenance Overhead
  Keeping tests up to date as UI changes occur can require significant effort, potentially leading to high maintenance costs if best practices in test design aren't followed.

Mockito JUnit Example

More videos:

Kalibrgun CAPYBARA Released - FIRST REVIEW 2019

More videos: