Microsoft Outlook Reviews

Coq Reviews

Microsoft Outlook mentions (11)

• Gryphmail completely gone???

  It seems like there might be an issue for the UofG site that had the direct link to GryphMail. However, this is not the only way to access your school email. You can go to Outlook and sign in through there with you @uoguelph.ca address — this method works and I was able to access my GryphMail today. Source: about 1 year ago

• Email activation

  If you've paid your confirmation deposit your email should be created (it can sometimes take 2-3 days). If you've activated your identikey you should be able to log in at https://outlook.live.com/owa/. Source: about 1 year ago

• Whats your favourite app that can work as a calendar and also effectively time-block out tasks?

  In** 2013** the company I worked for decided that everyone needed to move to Microsoft. We all started to use Outlook and the rest of the Office suite. I really liked the Outlook calendar on the desktop as I could schedule tasks and calendar items (with a little tweaking). Unfortunately, that did not translate to mobile. So I began using paper printouts of my day to stay on task whenever I was away from my PC. Source: over 1 year ago

• Power BI Training

  You also need a Power BI subscription for some of the labs. You can setup a free Microsoft 365 E5 trial here. Pro Tip: Don't use your real email address when setting up the trial. Create a free dummy email here. That way you can setup another free trial using a different dummy email address once the free trial runs out. Source: almost 2 years ago

• is there a way to get just excel and not get 365??

  It’s free with the free version of Outlook. Kinda bare bones but works for most functions. Https://outlook.live.com/owa/. Source: almost 2 years ago

Coq mentions (46)

• The First Stable Release of a Rust-Rewrite Sudo Implementation

  Are those more important than, say: - Proven with Coq, a formal proof management system: https://coq.inria.fr/ See in the real world: https://aws.amazon.com/security/provable-security/ And check out Computer-Aided Verification (CAV). - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• In Which I Claim Rich Hickey Is Wrong

  Dafny and Whiley are two examples with explicit verification support. Idris and other dependently typed languages should all be rich enough to express the required predicate but might not necessarily be able to accept a reasonable implementation as proof. Isabelle, Lean, Coq, and other theorem provers definitely can express the capability but aren't going to churn out much in the way of executable programs;... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• If given a list of properties/definitions and relationship between them, could a machine come up with (mostly senseless, but) true implications?

  Still, there are many useful tools based on these ideas, used by programmers and mathematicians alike. What you describe sounds rather like Datalog (e.g. Soufflé Datalog), where you supply some rules and an initial fact, and the system repeatedly expands out the set of facts until nothing new can be derived. (This has to be finite, if you want to get anywhere.) In Prolog (e.g. SWI Prolog) you also supply a set of... Source: 11 months ago

• Mark Petruska has requested 250000 Algos for the development of a Coq-avm library for AVM version 8

  Information about the Coq proof assistant: https://coq.inria.fr/ , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coq. Source: about 1 year ago

• Basic SAT model of x86 instructions using Z3, autogenerated from Intel docs

  This type of thing can help you formally verify code. So, if your proof is correct, and your description of the (language/CPU) is correct, you can prove the code does what you think it does. Formal proof systems are still growing up, though, and they are still pretty hard to use. See Coq for an introduction: https://coq.inria.fr/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago