Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Microsoft IIS VS Azure Load Balancer

Compare Microsoft IIS VS Azure Load Balancer and see what are their differences

Microsoft IIS logo Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Azure Load Balancer logo Azure Load Balancer

Azure Load Balancer delivers high availability and network performance to the applications.
  • Microsoft IIS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-25
  • Azure Load Balancer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-13

Microsoft IIS features and specs

  • Integration with Windows Server
    Since IIS is developed by Microsoft, it offers seamless integration with Windows Server, leveraging features like Active Directory, .NET Framework, and PowerShell for enhanced performance and manageability.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    IIS features a graphical user interface (GUI) that simplifies the server setup and management process, making it easier for administrators to configure and maintain web applications.
  • Extensive Documentation and Support
    Being a product from Microsoft, IIS offers comprehensive documentation, extensive online resources, and professional technical support, which can be highly beneficial for enterprise users.
  • Security Features
    IIS includes various built-in security features, such as dynamic IP restrictions, request filtering, application pooling, and integration with Windows authentication, making it a secure choice for hosting web applications.
  • Performance and Scalability
    IIS is optimized for performance and can effectively handle multiple requests and high-traffic websites. It also supports load balancing and server farms to enhance scalability.

Possible disadvantages of Microsoft IIS

  • Cost Considerations
    Unlike some other web servers that are open-source and free, IIS may incur licensing costs as it requires a Windows Server license, making it potentially expensive for small-scale deployments.
  • Platform Dependency
    IIS runs exclusively on the Windows platform, which can be a limitation for organizations that use a diverse set of operating systems or prefer open-source ecosystems like Linux.
  • Complex Configuration for Advanced Features
    While IIS offers a user-friendly interface for basic setups, configuring advanced features may require considerable expertise and can become complex, particularly for those unfamiliar with Microsoft's environment.
  • Performance Overheads
    IIS may introduce performance overhead due to the multiple layers of abstraction and integration with Windows features, which can affect performance in some high-demand scenarios compared to lightweight, minimalist web servers.
  • Lower Community Support
    Open-source web servers like Apache and Nginx have large, active communities that contribute to continuous improvement and troubleshooting. IIS, being a proprietary product, has a smaller community in comparison.

Azure Load Balancer features and specs

  • Scalability
    Azure Load Balancer automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple targets, such as virtual machines, scaling as needed to handle high amounts of traffic efficiently.
  • High Availability
    With a design for high availability and redundancy, Azure Load Balancer ensures that applications remain accessible even during hardware or software failures.
  • Geographic Distribution
    Azure Load Balancer can be configured for global distribution, enabling traffic to be efficiently routed to the nearest data center for minimized latency.
  • Integration with Azure Ecosystem
    It seamlessly integrates with other Azure services, providing a cohesive experience and ease of management within the Azure environment.
  • Security
    Offers network address translation (NAT) and provides features like port forwarding and secure internal communications to enhance application security.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Load Balancer

  • Complexity in Configuration
    Setting up and managing load balancers can be complex, especially for organizations new to cloud infrastructure, requiring a good understanding of networking principles.
  • Cost Considerations
    While Azure Load Balancer offers significant capabilities, these come at a cost which might add up, especially when scaling large applications.
  • Learning Curve
    For teams not already using Azure, there could be a learning curve associated with understanding how to effectively use and integrate Azure Load Balancer.
  • Limited Protocol Support
    Azure Load Balancer primarily supports TCP and UDP protocols, which might be a limitation for applications needing support for other protocols.

Microsoft IIS videos

Analyzing Microsoft IIS Web Logs - Part 1

More videos:

  • Review - My SEO Video 2017 Microsoft IIS SEO Toolkit

Azure Load Balancer videos

Azure Networking - #14 - Azure Load Balancer

More videos:

  • Review - Azure Load Balancer Deep Dive
  • Tutorial - Azure Load Balancer Tutorial

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Microsoft IIS and Azure Load Balancer)
Web And Application Servers
Web Servers
90 90%
10% 10
Application Server
100 100%
0% 0
Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy

User comments

Share your experience with using Microsoft IIS and Azure Load Balancer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Microsoft IIS and Azure Load Balancer

Microsoft IIS Reviews

Apache, IIS, NGINX, GWS : What’s Your Choice?
Utilizing a specific type of virtual or physical server determines the type of web server software you use. If you prefer Microsoft, then you will prefer to use IIS (Internet Information Services / Server) by Microsoft as your primary web server application solution. If you use Linux distribution, you have other alternatives like Apache, NGINX and LiteSpeed.
Source: www.milesweb.in
What Is the Most Popular Web Server Application in 2021?
Despite being bundled with most modern Microsoft software, IIS loses out to Apache on its own devices. The main selling point here is performance. While IIS has kept up with Apache in recent times, Apache has historically been performing much better, which still gives it an edge over IIS.

Azure Load Balancer Reviews

We have no reviews of Azure Load Balancer yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Load Balancer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Microsoft IIS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Microsoft IIS yet. Tracking of Microsoft IIS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Azure Load Balancer mentions (1)

  • Websites and services crashing has been an issue for a long time.
    That's why there are load balancers and many cloud offerings let you scale on demand. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Microsoft IIS and Azure Load Balancer, you can also consider the following products

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

AWS Elastic Load Balancing - Amazon ELB automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple Amazon EC2 instances in the cloud.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Google Cloud Load Balancing - Google Cloud Load Balancer enables users to scale their applications on Google Compute Engine.