MAMP VS Webpack

MAMP

MAMP is the abbreviation for Macintosh, Apache, MySQL, and PHP. It is a reliable application with its four components that allows you to access the local PHP server as well as the database server (SQL).

Webpack

Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

Landing page //
2023-09-12

Landing page //
2023-06-13

How to install Wordpress locally with MAMP in less than 5 minutes

Webpack videos

+ Add

Learn Webpack - Full Tutorial for Beginners

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MAMP and Webpack)

MAMP

Webpack

Web And Application Servers

100 100%

Web And Application Servers

0% 0

Web Application Bundler

0 0%

Web Application Bundler

100% 100

Web Servers

100 100%

Web Servers

0% 0

JS Build Tools

0 0%

JS Build Tools

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using MAMP and Webpack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare MAMP and Webpack

MAMP Reviews

Top 6 Alternatives to XAMPP for Local Development Environments

MAMP - A powerful and user-friendly local server environment suitable for developers at all levels, from beginners who want to quickly set up a local testing environment to professionals needing advanced features and flexibility. Supports both macOS and Windows, and includes services and languages beyond Apache, MySQL, and PHP, such as Nginx, Perl, Python, offering both free...

Source: dev.to

Best XAMPP Alternatives for Website Development in 2024

Other alternatives like WAMP, MAMP, LocalWP, EasyPHP, Laragon, and AMPPS also provide unique features, but InstaWP stands out for its efficiency and ease of use. By leveraging InstaWP, developers can streamline their workflow and create exceptional websites with confidence.

Source: instawp.com

8 Best MAMP Alternatives (Definitive List)

Putting all of those downsides aside, MAMP is a good option if you plan on working on a single WordPress local development project. The MAMP stack includes all of the components that WordPress needs, including the webserver, database, and PHP. In practice, you can use MAMP to launch a WordPress website in a matter of minutes.

Source: kinsta.com

13 Best XAMPP Alternatives

It offers a wide range of great features, but let’s take a look at some of its best characteristics: automatic detection for PHP versions, Apache versions, MySQL versions, and much more; native support for most typical servers, including Xampp, LAMP, MAMP, and WampServer; automatic updates using CPanel on your server; easy migration process that can migrate databases between...

Source: thetechtian.com

9 Best XAMPP Alternatives Cross Platform Web Server

It also comes with the MAMP cloud feature where you can backup all hosts individually to the cloud, once this is down you no longer have to worry about losing your progress due to some technical issue and you can also work on your projects from any device as long as you have access to MAMP cloud.

Source: technicalustad.com

Webpack Reviews

Rollup v. Webpack v. Parcel

Tool Prod Build Time One Prod Build Time Two Prod Build Time Three Prod Build Time Avg Parcel 738.509 s 35.364 s 35.592 s 269.82 avg s Rollup 0.712 s 0.665 s 0.714 s 0.697 avg s Webpack 3.636 s 3.805 s 4.305 s 3.915 avg s

Source: x-team.com

If you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!

document.body.className = document.body.className.replace(/(^|\s)is-noJs(\s|$)/, "$1is-js$2")HomepageHomepageJavascriptBecome a memberSign inGet startedIf you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!And how to hit the ground running with Parcel.Ibrahim ButtBlockedUnblockFollowFollowingMar 16, 2018Click here to share this article on LinkedIn »Zero...

Source: medium.com

First impressions with Parcel JS

From first impressions and experience, my take currently would be as follows. Webpack is generally going to be more flexible. It also places a bit more power in the developers hands to make bundling happen exactly as desired. That isn’t to say you shouldn’t use Parcel though. Where Parcel excels is the fact you don’t configure it. You will still need to configure plugins for...

Source: codeburst.io

Parcel vs webpack - Jakob Lind

Webpack is the stable choice. You will not get fired for picking webpack. But you don’t get as much stuff for free such as optimized bundles, and code splitting.

Source: blog.jakoblind.no

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webpack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 220 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MAMP mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MAMP yet. Tracking of MAMP recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Webpack mentions (220)

Practical and Beginner friendly guide for speeding up your web-apps
There are various tools available that manage the size of bundled assets. We are going to use the example of a popular and widely used bundler named Webpack, and practically look at many of the optimization techniques it offers. - Source: dev.to / 15 days ago
JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview
In part 3 We jump into the world of bundlers, comparing webpack, esbuild, vite, and parcel 2. This section aims to guide developers through each bundler, focusing on their performance, compatibility, and ease of use. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Webpack: The Web Module Bundler
Thats all about Webpack Basic, there are lots of feature of webpack, You can check here: https://webpack.js.org/. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
How to improve page load speed and response times: A comprehensive guide
Many web pages use CSS and JavaScript files to handle various features and styles. Each file, however, requires a separate HTTP request, which can slow down page loading. Concatenation comes into play here. It involves combining multiple CSS or JavaScript files into a single file. As a result, pages load faster, reducing the time spent requesting individual files. Gulp, Grunt, and Webpack are some of the tools... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Build a Vite 5 backend integration with Flask
Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them.... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago