locust VS Capybara

Finally, let's compare the response time of the requests. For that, we will use Locust , an open source load testing tool. The tests will run for 5 minutes, and will increase 4 requests per second every second until they reach 1000 requests per second. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

Locust: Another open-source tool, Locust is particularly flexible due to its support for Python scripts. It can conduct load tests across multiple machines, making it possible to simulate millions of users simultaneously. An exceptional feature of Locust is its web-based UI, which allows real-time tracking of performance metrics during test execution. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

Locust is a perfect tool to use on such occasion:. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

So, in theory, we can handle 300 requests per minute on a single server which was the assumption we started with. After this, I decided to play with this configuration and see what we could achieve. But, to go ahead I need a system to measure the metrics of our load testing. So I quickly set up Locust on my system. Locust is an open-source easy to setup load-testing framework. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

The OpenTelemetry Demo is composed of microservices written in different programming languages that talk to each other over gRPC and HTTP; and a load generator which uses Locust to fake user traffic. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

Cuba takes help from a lot of other technologies to bring the best of everything. For example, the responses in Cuba are the optimized version of the Rack responses. The templates are integrated via Tilt and testing via Cutest and Capybara. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago

Engineering at Aha! Focuses on using and improving the Capybara test framework. We have added many helpers and additional functionality to make working with Capybara easy. Testing at mobile widths is another chance to improve our testing tooling. Here is the incremental approach that we used to add mobile testing helpers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Since the Capybara library drives the underlying tests, Minitest also has the same syntax. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

The nice thing about partial templates is that templates are unit-testable with View specs (or similarly in Minitest) and the rendered output can even be verified using Capybara matchers. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

To piggyback: This would be a type of browser test, so you would want to use something like Cypress (https://github.com/testdouble/cypress-rails) or Capybara (https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara). RSpec has a good integration with Capybara. Cypress is JS-based so it will require some additional config. Source: about 2 years ago