Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

LLVM VS Haxe

Compare LLVM VS Haxe and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

LLVM logo LLVM

LLVM is a compiler infrastructure designed for compile-time, link-time, run-time, and...

Haxe logo Haxe

Haxe is an open source toolkit based on a modern, high level, strictly typed programming language.
  • LLVM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-11-06
  • Haxe Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-28

We recommend LibHunt Haxe for discovery and comparisons of trending Haxe projects.

LLVM features and specs

  • Modularity
    LLVM is designed to be modular and flexible, allowing developers to utilize only the components they need for their specific tasks. This makes it versatile for a wide range of use cases.
  • Optimization
    LLVM provides advanced optimization techniques that allow for efficient code execution across various platforms. It utilizes a variety of standard and state-of-the-art optimization passes to improve performance.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    LLVM supports a wide range of architectures and platforms, enabling developers to build and deploy applications across multiple target environments without needing to make significant code changes.
  • Rich Ecosystem
    The LLVM project includes a wide array of tools and libraries, such as Clang and LLDB, that enhance development capabilities and provide comprehensive support for different programming languages.
  • Community and Industry Adoption
    LLVM has a robust and active community, along with backing from major technology companies. This means consistent updates, improvements, and a broad support network for troubleshooting and enhancements.

Possible disadvantages of LLVM

  • Complexity
    Due to its extensive feature set and flexibility, LLVM can be complex to understand and use, particularly for newcomers who may find its detailed API and documentation challenging.
  • Resource Intensive
    The advanced optimizations and capabilities provided by LLVM can require significant compute resources, which might not be suitable for all systems or use cases, particularly those with limited capabilities.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    LLVM's power and flexibility come with a steep learning curve, demanding a strong understanding of compiler design and architecture to fully leverage its potential.
  • Limited Legacy Support
    While LLVM supports many modern architectures, its focus on newer platforms means that it may offer limited functionality for legacy systems or older processor architectures.
  • Lack of High-Level Language Features
    LLVM is primarily focused on compiler and intermediate representation infrastructure, which means that it does not provide some high-level language features or abstractions unless provided by front-end tools.

Haxe features and specs

  • Cross-Platform
    Haxe allows developers to write code once and compile it to multiple target platforms, including JavaScript, C++, C#, Java, Python, Lua, and others.
  • Strong Typing
    Haxe has a strong, static type system which helps to catch errors at compile time, leading to more robust and error-free code.
  • High Performance
    Because Haxe compiles directly to native code or optimized JavaScript, it can offer performance close to, or even indistinguishable from, hand-written code in the target language.
  • Open Source
    Haxe is open-source, which means it is free to use and has a community-driven development model that can lead to rapid improvements and updates.
  • Standard Library
    Haxe comes with a versatile standard library that is designed to work seamlessly across all target platforms, ensuring consistency and reducing the need for platform-specific code.
  • Macro System
    Haxe has a powerful macro system that allows for advanced metaprogramming capabilities, making it possible to write more expressive and flexible code.
  • Interoperability
    Haxe allows for easy integration with existing projects and libraries in various target languages, making it easier to adopt without having to completely rewrite existing code.

Possible disadvantages of Haxe

  • Smaller Community
    Haxe has a relatively smaller community compared to more mainstream technologies like JavaScript or Python, which can result in fewer resources, libraries, and third-party tools.
  • Learning Curve
    As Haxe supports multiple platforms, there is a learning curve associated with understanding how to effectively target different platforms and leverage Haxe's unique features.
  • Tooling
    Although Haxe has seen improvements, its tooling ecosystem (IDEs, debuggers, etc.) may not be as mature or feature-rich as those available for more established languages.
  • Native Libraries
    While Haxe can interoperate with existing libraries, it may not have native libraries that match the breadth and depth available in the target platform’s native languages.
  • Less Documentation
    Due to its smaller user base, Haxe might have less comprehensive documentation and fewer tutorials compared to more popular programming languages.
  • Ecosystem Fragmentation
    The wide range of target platforms can sometimes lead to a fragmented ecosystem, where community efforts and support might be unevenly distributed across different targets.

LLVM videos

Interview with LLVM Foundation President Tanya Lattner

More videos:

  • Review - [COSCUP2021] A trip about how I contribute to LLVM
  • Review - Introduction to LLVM Building simple program analysis tools and instrumentation

Haxe videos

Haxe: An understated powerhouse for software development - George Corney [ACCU 2019]

More videos:

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LLVM and Haxe)
IDE
100 100%
0% 0
Programming Language
0 0%
100% 100
Email Marketing
100 100%
0% 0
OOP
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using LLVM and Haxe. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare LLVM and Haxe

LLVM Reviews

We have no reviews of LLVM yet.
Be the first one to post

Haxe Reviews

The Best Gaming Engines You Should Consider for 2023
Haxe is a multiple-platform game engine that’s used for creating games using the Haxe programming language. It’s designed to be a high-performance game dev framework that’s supported by both a big community of Haxe devs and a wide range of libraries.
12 Best Frameworks and Toolkits to Build Desktop Applications
Haxe is a cross-platform desktop application development framework, so it can work on both desktop and handheld devices. If you know Java, C#, Python, PHP, and other advanced web programming languages, working with this framework will not be a hassle.
Source: geekflare.com
Top 10 Mobile Game Development Tools For Intellectual Games
It has a wealth of game frameworks and libraries and a vast range of features and APIs to create masterpiece mobile games. Given the fact that Haxe is fast enough to work all the way excellently through the development, game developers prefer Haxe.
Source: unaryteam.com
The Best 15 Mobile Game Engines / Development Platforms & Tools in 2020
Haxe is a programming language that resembles Java, C++, PHP or AS3 languages. It also includes a library from which you can select frameworks and choose between a wide range of functions and procedures (APIs) to develop your mobile game.
Source: thetool.io
Frameworks & Tools to Develop Cross-Platform Desktop Apps – Best of
Cons: Programs with native AS3 libraries are not yet fully supported by Haxe. Beside this, debugging difficulties increase after language translation of the source code, hence building something with Haxe requires high coding standards.

Social recommendations and mentions

LLVM might be a bit more popular than Haxe. We know about 55 links to it since March 2021 and only 48 links to Haxe. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LLVM mentions (55)

  • macOS Sequoia is certified to Unix 03
    Apple has made some substantial open source contributions. - LLVM - https://llvm.org/ - They are the stewards of CUPS (Common UNIX Printing System) - https://www.cups.org/ - Darwin kernel is open source - https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/xnu. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Why you should keep an eye on Apache DataFusion and its community.
    Similarly, LLVM revolutionized the world of programming languages and compilers. Since its creation, we've seen many new languages being created of increased complexity. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Yes, Ruby is fast, but…
    In conclusion, none of the proposed changes to the Ruby version of the code makes a dent in the Crystal version. This is not entirely Crystal's doing: it uses the LLVM backend, which generates very optimized binaries. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Playing with DragonRuby Game Toolkit (DRGTK)
    This Ruby implementation is based on mruby and LLVM and it’s commercial software but cheap. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Which books/resources to understand modern Assembler?
    'Computer Architeture: A Quantitative Apporach" and/or more specific design types (mips, arm, etc) can be found under the Morgan Kaufmann Series in Computer Architeture and Design. "Getting Started with LLVM Core Libraries: Get to Grips With Llvm Essentials and Use the Core Libraries to Build Advanced Tools " "The Architecture of Open Source Applications (Volume 1) : LLVM" https://aosabook.org/en/v1/llvm.html... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

Haxe mentions (48)

  • How Flash Games shaped the video game industry
    The proprietary tools were only an issue for people who needed the timeline. Games-wise, Both Actionscript 2 and 3 were perfectly usable without Flash. The MTASC compiler was a massive game-changer, and then Adobe released the AS3 compiler themselves, and certainly when I was at a consultancy working on a massive, expensive game, none of us were authoring anything in Flash. Even the designers and artists simply... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Ask HN: Platform for 11 year old to create video games?
    Have you checked out https://haxe.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • HyperCard Simulator
    "Flash went away faster than a replacement emerged." Not really how it looks to me: https://haxe.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Wax compiler – a tiny language designed to transpile to other languages
    This remineds me of Haxe[1]. I like Wax better because of the Common-Lisp-like syntax. [1]: https://haxe.org. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Marimo: Interactive Fluffy Ball
    I thought this was a three.js demo but it's actually built with a language called haxe [1]. I've never heard of this language before and looks really cool. Makes me want to play with it! [1] https://haxe.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LLVM and Haxe, you can also consider the following products

GNU Compiler Collection - The GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) is a compiler system produced by the GNU Project supporting...

Kotlin - Statically typed Programming Language targeting JVM and JavaScript

clang - C, C++, Objective C and Objective C++ front-end for the LLVM compiler.

Java - A concurrent, class-based, object-oriented, language specifically designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible

NASM - The Netwide Assembler, NASM, is an 80x86 and x86-64 assembler designed for portability and...

JavaScript - Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions