Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

LaunchDarkly VS Apache ActiveMQ

Compare LaunchDarkly VS Apache ActiveMQ and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

LaunchDarkly logo LaunchDarkly

LaunchDarkly is a powerful development tool which allows software developers to roll out updates and new features.

Apache ActiveMQ logo Apache ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.
  • LaunchDarkly Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-12
  • Apache ActiveMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01

LaunchDarkly features and specs

  • Comprehensive Feature Flag Management
    LaunchDarkly offers a robust platform for feature flag management, allowing for granular control over which features are enabled for different user segments.
  • Real-time Feature Control
    Changes to feature flags can be made in real-time, reducing the need for redeploys and allowing for instant rollouts and rollbacks.
  • Scalability
    LaunchDarkly is built to handle large-scale deployments and can manage tens of millions of feature flags efficiently.
  • Team Collaboration
    The platform includes features that facilitate team collaboration, such as role-based access control and detailed audit logs.
  • Integration Capabilities
    LaunchDarkly supports integrations with a wide range of DevOps and CI/CD tools, making it easier to incorporate into existing workflows.
  • Advanced Targeting
    The platform allows for sophisticated targeting rules and user segmentation, enabling highly personalized feature rollouts.

Possible disadvantages of LaunchDarkly

  • Cost
    LaunchDarkly can be expensive, especially for smaller organizations or startups with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    The platform can be complex to set up and use effectively, requiring a learning curve for new users.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity
    Real-time updates and functionality depend on an internet connection, which may be a limitation for some use cases.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Once integrated, switching to another feature flag service can be time-consuming and difficult due to the level of integration and customization.
  • Limited Offline Support
    Offline support is not as robust as some other solutions, potentially affecting scenarios where intermittent connectivity is expected.
  • Enterprise Focus
    While powerful, some features and pricing models are more geared towards enterprise users, potentially alienating smaller or non-enterprise customers.

Apache ActiveMQ features and specs

  • Open Source
    ActiveMQ is open-source under the Apache License, making it free to use and modify. This can lead to cost savings compared to commercial solutions.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    ActiveMQ supports multiple messaging protocols, including AMQP, MQTT, OpenWire, Stomp, and others, allowing for flexible integration with various systems and applications.
  • Java Integration
    Written in Java, ActiveMQ integrates well with JVM-based applications and other Apache projects like Camel and Karaf, making it a good fit for Java-centric environments.
  • High Availability
    Features like broker clustering, network of brokers, and failover support provide robust high availability options, ensuring message delivery even in case of failures.
  • Performance and Scalability
    ActiveMQ can handle a large number of messages and users by scaling horizontally, making it suitable for both small and enterprise-level applications.
  • Admin Console
    ActiveMQ provides a web-based admin console for easy management and monitoring of the message broker, simplifying administrative tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Apache ActiveMQ

  • Complex Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for newcomers. It often requires a steep learning curve to understand all the available options and optimizations.
  • Resource Intensive
    ActiveMQ can be resource-intensive, particularly in high-throughput scenarios, which may necessitate more robust hardware for optimal performance.
  • Latency
    In certain configurations, ActiveMQ may exhibit higher latency compared to other brokers, which might not make it suitable for use cases requiring real-time guarantees.
  • Java Dependency
    As a Java-based solution, ActiveMQ requires the JVM, which can be a downside for organizations that have standardized on other technology stacks.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around ActiveMQ, it may not be as large or as active as those for other, similar open-source projects. This can lead to slower responses to issues and fewer community-based resources.
  • Documentation
    Though comprehensive, the documentation can sometimes be difficult to navigate, making it challenging for users to find specific information quickly.

Analysis of LaunchDarkly

Overall verdict

  • LaunchDarkly is generally regarded as a good choice for teams that require robust feature management capabilities. It is particularly beneficial for organizations practicing continuous delivery and aiming to reduce release risk while increasing development velocity.

Why this product is good

  • LaunchDarkly is considered a strong feature management platform because it allows for dynamic feature flagging, safe and controlled feature rollouts, and enhanced experimentation. It enables teams to release features to specific user segments or test them in a production environment without deploying new code. Additionally, LaunchDarkly supports real-time updates, integrates with various DevOps tools, and provides comprehensive analytics and user insights.

Recommended for

  • Development teams that prioritize feature experimentation and A/B testing
  • Organizations practicing continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD)
  • Companies looking to minimize release risk and improve feature management
  • Teams requiring integration with existing DevOps and CI/CD tools

Analysis of Apache ActiveMQ

Overall verdict

  • Apache ActiveMQ is generally considered a good choice for message brokering due to its comprehensive feature set, stability, and scalability. It is especially beneficial in environments where integration between different systems and technologies is necessary, thanks to its support of numerous messaging protocols.

Why this product is good

  • Apache ActiveMQ is a popular open-source message broker that is known for its flexibility and reliability. It supports multiple messaging protocols and offers features such as high availability, load balancing, and a robust set of messaging patterns. It is a mature project with a large user base and a supportive community. Its ability to integrate with various platforms and languages, along with its rich feature set, makes it a suitable choice for many applications requiring reliable message queuing.

Recommended for

    Apache ActiveMQ is recommended for enterprises looking for a reliable and scalable message broker, developers needing rich messaging functionality, and organizations that require robust support for various messaging protocols, including JMS, AMQP, STOMP, and MQTT. It is particularly well-suited for applications that need to distribute messages between different applications, languages, and platforms.

LaunchDarkly videos

+ Add

How LaunchDarkly Enables Product Managers to Test in Production

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started with Feature Flags - #1 LaunchDarkly Feature Flags
  • Review - Show & Tell with LaunchDarkly's Edith Harbaugh: Mobile Feature Flags

Apache ActiveMQ videos

No Apache ActiveMQ videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LaunchDarkly and Apache ActiveMQ)

LaunchDarkly

Apache ActiveMQ

Developer Tools
100 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0
Data Integration
0 0%
Data Integration
100% 100
Feature Flags
100 100%
Feature Flags
0% 0
Stream Processing
0 0%
Stream Processing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using LaunchDarkly and Apache ActiveMQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare LaunchDarkly and Apache ActiveMQ

LaunchDarkly Reviews

Top Mobile Feature Flag Tools
LaunchDarkly is another dedicated feature flag management tool that offers extensive features. They support a variety of platforms and languages and boast clients like Microsoft, Atlassian, and Invision. Like Rollout, LaunchDarkly offers all the features of an enterprise-grade tool but, unlike Rollout, reserves the security features for the “Enterprise” plan. Out of the box,...
Source: instabug.com
Feature Toggling Tools for $100 or less
A differentiating factor is the functionality to schedule releases through the console, LaunchDarkly and FeatureFlow have incorporated this into their front end. Another front-end feature of interest is user segmentation management, which is available with LaunchDarkly, Rollout, and Bullet train subscriptions.
Source: medium.com

Apache ActiveMQ Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
ActiveMQ is a flexible, open-source, multi-protocol messaging broker that supports many protocols. This makes it easy for developers to use a variety of languages and platforms. The AMQP protocol facilitates integration with many applications based on different platforms. However, ActiveMQ’s high-end data accessibility capabilities are complemented by its load balancing,...
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
It is a managed information broker for Apache ActiveMQ which has simple installation and it runs message broker in cloud. It doesn’t need any special look after regular management and maintenance of the message system. It is utilized to send bulk message services.
Source: gokicker.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
Apache ActiveMQ is a popular, open-source, flexible multi-protocol messaging broker. Since it has great support for industry-based protocols, developers get access to languages and platforms. It helps in connecting clients written in languages like Python, C, C++, JavaScript, etc. With the help of the AMQP protocol, integration with many applications with different platforms...
Source: www.spec-india.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, LaunchDarkly should be more popular than Apache ActiveMQ. It has been mentiond 37 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LaunchDarkly mentions (37)

  • How to Add Paid Features to Your SaaS Apps
    This kind of goes without saying since it's the opposite of the first don't I listed, but it's worth restating and giving some examples. Using tools from third parties means taking advantage of what they have done so you don't have to do that work. This means you are free to build things that make your app special. I like to use feature flag tools for this. Some examples are LaunchDarkly, Split, and AWS App... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Pivoting a million dollar DevTool startup
    Taplytics is a broad A/B testing platform for marketing teams. While DevCycle is a feature flagging tool built for developers. Taplytics actually has feature flagging, but DevCycle is much more focused and plans to compete directly with incumbents like LaunchDarkly by building a better developer experience (more on how later). But with Taplytics they built so many features and every customer was using them in a... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Arc Update - 1.20.1 (43987)
    I had a custom rule added to Little Snitch that blocked the following domains: launchdarkly.com, clientstream.launchdarkly.com, mobile.launchdarkly.com. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Feature flags implementation in Nest.js 😻
    There are however Saas to implement directly a feature management system. Several solutions exist like LaunchDarkly, Flagsmith or Unleash.io. Using a SaaS (Software as a Service) feature flagging solution offers the advantage of a faster and more straightforward implementation process. These services are readily available and can be quickly integrated into your project. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Boost DX, Enhance UX, and Skyrocket Profits! Dive into a sub-50ms world with Edge Feature Flags 🚀
    Currently, there are numerous feature flag systems available. Options include our own company's open-source system, "Bucketeer", and the renowned SaaS "LaunchDarkly" among others. When comparing these, the following considerations might come into play:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

Apache ActiveMQ mentions (7)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LaunchDarkly and Apache ActiveMQ, you can also consider the following products

Flagsmith - Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source.

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

ConfigCat - ConfigCat is a developer-centric feature flag service with unlimited team size, awesome support, and a reasonable price tag.

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

Unleash - Unleash is an open-source feature management platform. We are private, secure, and ready for the most complex setups out of the box.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Loading...