Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Kitty terminal VS CodeKeep

Compare Kitty terminal VS CodeKeep and see what are their differences

The page you are looking for does not exist

Kitty terminal logo Kitty terminal

Super fast, GPU and OpenGL based terminal emulator with tiling support

CodeKeep logo CodeKeep

Codekeep lets you store and share bits of code and text with other users. Snippets can be organized into folders/labels for instant reuse.
  • Kitty terminal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-21
  • CodeKeep Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-09-19

Kitty terminal features and specs

  • Performance
    Kitty is designed to be a fast and efficient terminal, with support for GPU rendering. This can provide smoother and quicker display updates, especially beneficial for intensive command-line tasks.
  • Features
    Kitty offers a rich set of features including support for tabs, multiple layouts, and extensions. It also supports features like ligatures, image display, and sixel graphics.
  • Customization
    Kitty is highly customizable, allowing users to modify key bindings, color schemes, and more through its comprehensive configuration files.
  • Remote Control
    Kitty provides a remote control framework, which allows users to script and control the terminal from the command line or other external programs.
  • Platform Support
    Kitty is available on multiple platforms including Linux, macOS, and Windows (through WSL), making it versatile for various operating systems.
  • Active Development
    The terminal is actively maintained by its developers, ensuring regular updates, bug fixes, and the addition of new features.

Possible disadvantages of Kitty terminal

  • Learning Curve
    Given its extensive feature set and customization options, there can be a steep learning curve for new users unfamiliar with its configuration and advanced features.
  • Configuration Complexity
    The extensive customization options, while powerful, can be overwhelming and may require a considerable amount of time to configure to a user's liking.
  • Font Support
    Although Kitty supports font ligatures and several other advanced font features, some users have reported occasional issues with font rendering and compatibility.
  • Resource Usage
    While designed for performance, the use of GPU rendering can mean higher resource usage compared to simpler terminals, which might be noticeable on older hardware.
  • Documentation
    Though extensive, the documentation can sometimes be challenging to navigate for new users, making it harder to find specific information or solutions to particular problems.
  • No Native Windows Support
    Kitty does not have native Windows support; it runs on Windows through the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL). This might not be ideal for users looking for a fully native Windows terminal experience.

CodeKeep features and specs

  • Collaboration Tools
  • Code Editor
  • Code snippets

Kitty terminal videos

Kitty Is A Fast And Feature Rich Terminal Emulator

CodeKeep videos

No CodeKeep videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Kitty terminal and CodeKeep)
SSH
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Terminal Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Kitty terminal and CodeKeep. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Kitty terminal seems to be a lot more popular than CodeKeep. While we know about 93 links to Kitty terminal, we've tracked only 4 mentions of CodeKeep. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Kitty terminal mentions (93)

  • Optimizing My Dev Workflow in 2025
    Initially, I used the Mac's built-in Terminal, but encountered issues with font loading. This led me to explore alternative terminal options. I initially chose Kitty, but after the official release of Ghostty, I made the switch. It has been running flawlessly for me. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • iTerm2 Critical Security Fix
    Kitty (https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty) has been my go to for many years and with tmux it's fantastic. I have heard a lot of great things about https://ghostty.org/ but haven't had a chance to check it out. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Preview images, videos, fonts, PDFs ... in Vifm.
    The terminal I am currently using is st but I have also tested this "Vifm" enhancement in kitty and alacritty. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Show HN: Shpool, a Lightweight Tmux Alternative
    Oh, this might be the missing piece of the puzzle for me to get rid of tmux! I've been using screen/tmux for a long time. Recently I switched to kitty[0] locally. I like kitty a lot! But I've been stuck with tmux on my servers for session persistence. [0]: https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Ask HN: What macOS apps/programs do you use daily and recommend?
    Besides the usual Firefox/Chrome, Spotify, etc I use the following: - Karabiner-Elements for key remapping, specifically, for making caps lock into ctrl/esc. I don't know of anything else that does this job. Everyone who remaps keys seems to use this. - Kitty as my terminal of choice. I spend most of my time logged in remotely to a server via ssh where I attach to a tmux session. Kitty was easy enough to... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
View more

CodeKeep mentions (4)

  • Ask HN: Who wants to be hired? (September 2024)
    Hi there, I'm Jithin, a full-stack developer with ~9 years of experience looking for exciting new opportunities (remote or relocation friendly). I'm passionate about building robust, scalable cloud-native solutions with a focus on Golang microservices, GraphQL APIs, Next.js frontend. My experience extends to a diverse range of technologies which can be viewed on https://jithin.im I am also the founder of... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • 🚀 📸 Creating Accessible and Stunning code screenshots
    Create an account on https://codekeep.io. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Show HN: I'm working on an open-source self-hostable GitHub Gist
    I have also created a similar product, its called codekeep http://codekeep.io , - google keep for codesnippets that allows users to tag and organize snippets. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Free for dev - list of software (SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, etc.)
    CodeKeep - Google Keep for Code Snippets. Organize,Discover and share code snippets, featuring a powerful code screenshot tool with preset templates and linking feature. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Kitty terminal and CodeKeep, you can also consider the following products

wezterm - GPU-accelerated cross-platform terminal emulator and multiplexer made with Rust.

thiscodeWorks - Save and share code that works

iTerm2 - A terminal emulator for macOS that does amazing things.

30 seconds of code - JS snippets that you can understand in 30 seconds or less.

Tabby.sh - Tabby is a free and open source SSH, local and Telnet terminal with everything you'll ever need.

CodeMyUI - Handpicked code snippets you can use in your web projects