Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

JSONFormatter.org VS Pixi.js

Compare JSONFormatter.org VS Pixi.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

JSONFormatter.org logo JSONFormatter.org

Online JSON Formatter and JSON Validator will format JSON data, and helps to validate, convert JSON to XML, JSON to CSV. Save and Share JSON

Pixi.js logo Pixi.js

Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices
  • JSONFormatter.org Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-01
  • Pixi.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-14

JSONFormatter.org features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    JSONFormatter.org offers a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to format, validate, and edit JSON data quickly.
  • Multiple Tools
    The website provides a variety of tools including JSON beautifier, minifier, validator, and converter, which can be helpful for developers working with JSON.
  • Free to Use
    The platform is completely free, which makes it accessible for anyone who needs to format or validate JSON data without any cost.
  • Cross-Platform
    Since it's a web-based tool, it can be accessed from any device with a browser, making it versatile for use across different operating systems.
  • Additional Features
    Beyond JSON formatting, the site also offers tools for HTML, XML, CSV, and other data formats, making it a versatile resource for developers.

Possible disadvantages of JSONFormatter.org

  • No Offline Access
    The tool requires an internet connection to use, which can be a limitation for developers working in environments with limited connectivity.
  • Ads
    The free version of the website includes advertisements, which can be distracting and impact the user experience.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Submitting JSON data to a third-party web service can raise privacy concerns, especially if the data is sensitive or confidential.
  • Dependency on Web Browser
    As a web-based tool, it depends on the performance and reliability of the web browser, which may vary between users and devices.
  • Limited Customization
    The tool does not offer extensive customization options for formatting rules, which might be a drawback for users with specific formatting needs.

Pixi.js features and specs

  • High Performance
    Pixi.js utilizes WebGL to deliver high-performance rendering, which is ideal for building fast and responsive web applications and games.
  • Cross-Platform
    It supports multiple platforms, allowing developers to build applications that work seamlessly across different devices, including desktops, tablets, and smartphones.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Pixi.js has comprehensive and well-documented resources that help developers understand how to use the library effectively, including tutorials and examples.
  • Rich Feature Set
    The library comes with a wide range of features such as textures, sprites, and filters, enabling developers to create visually complex and appealing content.
  • Active Community
    Pixi.js benefits from a large and active community, which means frequent updates, a wealth of plugins, and abundant community support.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source library, Pixi.js is free to use and modify, making it accessible to developers with different levels of expertise and budgets.

Possible disadvantages of Pixi.js

  • Learning Curve
    Despite its extensive documentation, beginners may find Pixi.js challenging to learn and integrate into their projects because of its extensive feature set.
  • WebGL Dependencies
    While WebGL provides high performance, it can also cause compatibility issues on older devices or browsers that do not fully support WebGL.
  • Limited 3D Capabilities
    Pixi.js is primarily a 2D rendering engine, so it may not be suitable for projects that require advanced 3D graphics and interactions.
  • Size
    Compared to simpler libraries, Pixi.js can be relatively large in terms of file size, which could impact the loading times of web applications, especially on slower networks.
  • Complex Debugging
    Debugging issues in Pixi.js can be complex, especially in large applications, as it often involves low-level graphics operations and WebGL debugging tools.

Analysis of JSONFormatter.org

Overall verdict

  • Overall, JSONFormatter.org is considered a good tool. Its simplicity, functionality, and accessibility make it a preferred choice for developers and programmers who need to work with JSON data efficiently. It is reliable for both quick fixes and more thorough data inspections.

Why this product is good

  • JSONFormatter.org is a well-regarded tool for several reasons. It offers an easy-to-use interface for formatting and beautifying JSON data, which is particularly useful for developers working with JSON files. The tool helps in identifying syntax errors by displaying error messages, and its ability to minify JSON makes it convenient for optimizing payload sizes in web applications.

Recommended for

  • software developers who need to debug or present JSON data
  • web developers optimizing JSON payloads for web applications
  • students learning to structure and validate JSON files
  • anyone needing to quickly format or minify JSON without installing software

Analysis of Pixi.js

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Pixi.js is generally considered a good choice for 2D graphics rendering on the web.

Why this product is good

  • Performance: Pixi.js is known for its fast 2D rendering performance, leveraging WebGL and falling back to HTML5 Canvas when necessary.
  • Ease of Use: It has a straightforward API, which makes it accessible for both beginners and experienced developers.
  • Community: There's a strong and active community around Pixi.js, providing plenty of resources, plugins, and support.
  • Features: It offers a robust set of features for 2D graphics, including support for sprites, text, animation, and interaction.
  • Cross-Platform: Pixi.js works across different devices and browsers, ensuring broad compatibility.

Recommended for

  • Game Developers: Those looking to create 2D games with efficient rendering.
  • Web Developers: Developers needing to incorporate graphics or animations into their web projects.
  • Digital Artists: Artists wanting to create interactive experiences or digital art pieces.
  • Educators: Those educating others in graphics programming or web development.

JSONFormatter.org videos

No JSONFormatter.org videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Pixi.js videos

PixiJS Crash Course

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JSONFormatter.org and Pixi.js)
Development
66 66%
34% 34
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Charting Libraries
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using JSONFormatter.org and Pixi.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare JSONFormatter.org and Pixi.js

JSONFormatter.org Reviews

  1. It's my go to tool for JSON

    JSONFormatter.org is an invaluable tool for anyone working with JSON data. Its simple and user-friendly interface makes formatting, validating, and analyzing JSON effortless. The website's clean design allows for easy navigation and top-notch functionality.

    🏁 Competitors: CodeBeautify

Pixi.js Reviews

We have no reviews of Pixi.js yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JSONFormatter.org should be more popular than Pixi.js. It has been mentiond 27 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JSONFormatter.org mentions (27)

  • JSON Diff: Comparing JSON Data Effectively
    JSON Formatter & Validator This tool focuses on formatting JSON data while offering basic diff capabilities. • Features: Validate, format, and compare JSON data. • Use Case: Ideal for developers who need an all-in-one solution. • Website: https://jsonformatter.org How to Use JSON Diff Tools. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • How to be more productive when learning a new language
    3. JSON Formatter The GeoJSON file I used is super hefty, holding nested geographical information about country border locations as coordinate pairs, and information on country geometry, name etc. There are any number of ways you can show this file to get it to make sense, but I found another online tool that helped me break it down into readable chunks was JSON Formatter. It also helps validate JSON, useful if... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Show HN: VS Code Extension to skip the noisy web tools (JSON Prettify, and more)
    Hi HN, Simple online tools on the web have become unnecessary greedy. For example, * https://jsonformatter.org/ displays 7 ads on page load * https://convertcase.net/ had 4 ads plus a Google Vignette. And many more sites do the same thing. It's just noisy, which is why I created this VS Code Extension where you don't need to even leave your editor for your small web operations. I also built a Desktop app and an... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Blasphemous - Stuck at 148.25% - SOLUTION
    Now with your savefile decrypted click the "copy" button on the "output" tab (to the right of the trash can) and proceed to this website: https://jsonformatter.org/ Here you'll make the code more readable so paste what you've copied on the left box and click on the button on the middle that says "Format/Beautify". Then go to the box on the right where the code should be nice and pretty now and (once again) copy... Source: over 1 year ago
  • Selfhosted Prettyprint/Encoder/Decoder/Validator/Utility thing?
    I find myself using various online converters - prettyprint, URLencode/decode, HTML entity converter JSON validator, etc. I could whip these out in a CLI tool, but pasting to a web page is faster (for one thing, no need to remember all the various command semantics, deal with escaping, argument length limitations, etc). Something like https://jsonformatter.org. However, I don't like the idea of putting my data out... Source: about 2 years ago
View more

Pixi.js mentions (5)

  • Release Radar • March 2024 Edition
    If you're into video game dev, then PixiJS is something you need to know about. It's a HTML5 game engine that provides a lightweight 2D library across all devices. This latest update has a new package structure, custom builds, graphics API overhaul, and lots more. You can read about all these changes in the PixiJS Migration Guide. Also big congrats to PixiJS for being part of the open source community for ten... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Advice about useful libraries to create a 2D car game (hill climb racing style)
    I would need a renderer to display the graphics of my calculations on the "backend". After some research I think pixijs which is written in TS could be a great tool. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Is programming just not for me?
    And if that seems to up your alley you could look into Javascript game/renderer frameworks. They have 2D engines like https://github.com/photonstorm/phaser or https://github.com/pixijs/pixijs . Or my personal choice A-Frame which is a 3D, AR and VR engine (XR) https://github.com/aframevr/ . Source: over 2 years ago
  • Pixie – A full-featured 2D graphics library for Nim
    This has a high risk of being confused with pixi.js: https://github.com/pixijs/pixijs. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
  • Custome game engine: what stack ?
    WebGL, I hear, has a similar API to OpenGL. (Also, WebGPU is coming at some point.) Or, you could use a thin library that handles the WebGL drawing of sprites for you. I prefer that option over using a full game engine: I find it's better to only include dependencies when they become necessary. I recently tried a web rendering library called PixiJS, and it seemed like a pretty clean and nice-sized API, and... Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JSONFormatter.org and Pixi.js, you can also consider the following products

JSON Editor Online - View, edit and format JSON online

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

JSONLint - JSON Lint is a web based validator and reformatter for JSON, a lightweight data-interchange format.

Anime.js - Lightweight JavaScript animation library

JSON Formatter & Validator - The JSON Formatter was created to help with debugging.

D3.js - D3.js is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. D3 helps you bring data to life using HTML, SVG, and CSS.