Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

jsdom VS Browserless

Compare jsdom VS Browserless and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

jsdom logo jsdom

A JavaScript implementation of various web standards, for use with Node.js - jsdom/jsdom

Browserless logo Browserless

Headless browser automation built for developers.
  • jsdom Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29
  • Browserless Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-16

jsdom features and specs

  • Browser-like Environment
    jsdom provides a virtual representation of the browser's DOM environment, which allows developers to run scripts that usually require a browser.
  • Node.js Integration
    Being a Node.js library, jsdom can be easily integrated into server-side applications, enabling server-side DOM manipulation.
  • Testing Facilitation
    jsdom is commonly used in testing frameworks to simulate browser environments, allowing for headless testing of front-end code.
  • Standard-compliant
    jsdom strives to be compliant with web standards, which ensures consistent behavior with real browser environments.
  • Rich API
    It provides a rich set of APIs that mimic the browser DOM, making it comprehensive for developers needing browser-like functionality.

Possible disadvantages of jsdom

  • Performance Overhead
    jsdom can be slower than real browser environments because it runs in Node.js and not in a optimized browser engine.
  • Limited Browser Features
    While jsdom supports many DOM features, it might not support all the modern APIs and features available in the latest browsers.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running multiple jsdom instances can be resource-intensive, which may not be ideal for applications with large-scale DOM manipulation.
  • JavaScript Only
    Being specific to JavaScript and Node.js, jsdom is not suitable for developers working primarily in other programming environments.
  • Complexity in Setup
    Setting up and configuring jsdom for specific use cases can be more complex compared to some alternatives, requiring more effort from the developer.

Browserless features and specs

  • Scalability
    Browserless allows for scalable execution of browser automation scripts. It can handle multiple browser instances concurrently, which is beneficial for businesses needing to run numerous automated tasks in parallel.
  • Ease of Use
    The platform provides an API that simplifies the process of integrating browser automation into existing workflows. It's designed to be user-friendly even for those with limited experience in browser automation.
  • Reduced Infrastructure Overhead
    By using Browserless, businesses can offload the infrastructure burden of maintaining browser automation environments, reducing costs associated with hardware and maintenance.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    Browserless offers extensive documentation, making it easier for users to understand and utilize the platform efficiently, facilitating quicker onboarding and troubleshooting.
  • Security
    The platform includes security features such as encrypted connections and isolation of browser instances, providing a secure environment for executing tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Browserless

  • Cost
    While reducing infrastructure costs, Browserless introduces a subscription cost. For some small businesses or individual users, this cost might be prohibitive compared to running automation tasks on local machines.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Relying on a third-party service means any downtime or service issues with Browserless can directly impact your automation processes.
  • Limited Control
    Users might have limited control over specific browser settings and configurations as opposed to managing their own browser instances.
  • Learning Curve for APIs
    While the API is designed to be user-friendly, there is still a learning curve associated with understanding and effectively implementing it within one’s existing systems.
  • Potential Latency
    Since Browserless runs in the cloud, there may be latency issues depending on the user's network connection and proximity to the nearest service data center.

jsdom videos

JSDom & Enzyme: Different Test Styles for React Apps - Dan La Feir @ ReactNYC

More videos:

  • Review - Frontend Pairing - Discovering missing JSDOM APIs that didn’t allow to test Toast UI in jest

Browserless videos

What is browserless?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to jsdom and Browserless)
Automated Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Web Scraping
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Automation
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using jsdom and Browserless. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, jsdom should be more popular than Browserless. It has been mentiond 32 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

jsdom mentions (32)

  • Proton: Pluggable SSR + DOM | Or How I implemented better SSR from scratch
    Nah, I took a third path - looking for alternatives to JSDOM... And I found it - happy-dom. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • The Future of Htmx
    We do have pseudo-browsers written in pure js that you can theoretically use: https://github.com/jsdom/jsdom but they're about as reliable as you can expect: it's difficult to keep up the pace with the big three (or two) on standards compliance, and they usually don't even try. So the only reliable solution is a headless Chromium, Firefox, and/or WebKit-based noname browser like the sibling says.... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Go-DOM - A headless browser written in Go.
    Internally the test starts an HTTP server. Because the this runs in the test process, mocking and stubbing of business logic is possible. The test use jsdom to communicate with the HTTP server; which both parse the HTML response into a DOM, but also executes client-side script in a sandbox which has been initialised, e.g. With window as the global scope.3. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Excluding Dependencies: Bundling for Node and the Browser
    For example, I needed to parse an HTML string into a DOM Document. The browser already supports the DOMParser class, which is, unfortunately, not available in Node.js. Here, I have to fall back on JSDOM, which also exposes this class. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Migrating from Jest to Vitest for your React Application
    If you happen to be using React Testing Library in your project, you'll need to keep the jsdom dev dependency installed. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

Browserless mentions (8)

  • Self-hosted, simple web browser service – send URL, get screenshots
    If you’re worried about the security risks, edge cases, maintenance pain and scaling challenges of self hosting there are various solid hosted alternatives: - https://browserless.io - low level browser control - https://scrapingbee.com - scraping specialists - https://urlbox.com - screenshot specialists* They’re all profitable and have been around for years so you can depend on the businesses and the tech. *... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Web Crawler and Scraper for AI
    Very cool - and impressive speed! How does it compare with headless browser services like https://browserless.io or https://browserbase.com ? - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Show HN: Finic – open-source platform for building browser automations
    Https://browserless.io might be what you’re looking for. Open source although they do have a SaaS option. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • browserless Alternatives?
    Hello, I am building a scraper and I want to know if anyone knows an alternative to browserless.io? Source: almost 2 years ago
  • (Free) Open-source PDF Generation/Export
    Otherwise, any pdf to hml chromium based solution hosted via docker, like gotenberg](https://github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg) or browserless.io(which is free if you create open source). Generating pdfs from html directly in .NET was always a pain. Wkhtml (and wrappers that use it) uses WebKit and comes with a load of issues of its own, similar to running and styling anything in Safari. Using chromium based engine... Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing jsdom and Browserless, you can also consider the following products

html2canvas - JavaScript library to take "screenshots" of webpages or parts of it, directly on the...

Rebrowser - Discover Rebrowser - the next-gen virtual browser that outperform headless and antidetect solutions. Enjoy real device fingerprints, mobile support, and AI-powered CAPTCHA solving for seamless browsing.

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

puppeteer - Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium...

RasterizeHTML.js - Renders HTML into the browser's canvas.