Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

IBM Cloud Object Storage VS Commit Together by Github

Compare IBM Cloud Object Storage VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

IBM Cloud Object Storage logo IBM Cloud Object Storage

IBM Cloud Object Storage is a platform that offers cost-effective and scalable cloud storage for unstructured data.

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits
  • IBM Cloud Object Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04

IBM Cloud Object Storage features and specs

  • Scalability
    IBM Cloud Object Storage offers very high scalability, allowing businesses to store large amounts of data easily. This flexibility is crucial for businesses that are growing their storage needs or have fluctuating demands.
  • Data Resiliency
    The service provides robust data resiliency options, including geo-dispersed storage configurations, enabling enhanced protection against data loss and improved availability.
  • Cost Efficiency
    With its flexible pricing model, businesses can choose options that best fit their budget, such as 'Pay-as-you-go' plans, thereby optimizing costs according to actual usage.
  • Security Features
    It comes with comprehensive security features, including encryption, access control, and integration with IAM policies, ensuring that data is protected both at rest and in transit.
  • Integration
    Seamless integration with the broader IBM Cloud ecosystem, as well as other cloud services and applications, allows businesses to easily incorporate this storage solution into their existing cloud strategy.

Possible disadvantages of IBM Cloud Object Storage

  • Complexity
    The extensive feature set and customization options might lead to a steeper learning curve for new users or smaller teams without dedicated IT resources.
  • Performance Variability
    Depending on the region and specific use case, users might encounter variability in performance, particularly in scenarios requiring low-latency or high-throughput data access.
  • Support Availability
    While IBM offers various support plans, certain users might find the support mechanisms, such as community forums and basic plans, less responsive compared to some other providers.
  • Pricing Complexity
    Although pricing models are flexible, they can also become complex and convoluted, making it difficult for some businesses to predict costs precisely without detailed monitoring and analysis.
  • Limited Proprietary Tooling
    Compared to some competitors, IBM might have fewer proprietary tools and native applications directly integrated with their cloud storage, potentially requiring additional third-party tools or custom development for specific needs.

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

IBM Cloud Object Storage videos

IBM Cloud Object Storage: Built for business

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started with IBM Cloud Object Storage
  • Review - IBM Cloud Object Storage webinar

Commit Together by Github videos

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to IBM Cloud Object Storage and Commit Together by Github)
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using IBM Cloud Object Storage and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Commit Together by Github seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

IBM Cloud Object Storage mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of IBM Cloud Object Storage yet. Tracking of IBM Cloud Object Storage recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing IBM Cloud Object Storage and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products

Alibaba Object Storage Service - Alibaba Object Storage Service is an encrypted and secure cloud storage service which stores, processes and accesses massive amounts of data

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage - Storage made simple. Faster than Amazon's S3. Less expensive than Glacier.

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

Contabo Object Storage - S3-compatible cloud object storage with unlimited, free transfer at a fraction of what others charge. Easy migration & predictable billing. Sign up now & save.

CommitTasks - A small CLI tool that combines git commit and todo list 🛠📝