Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Contabo Object Storage VS Commit Together by Github

Compare Contabo Object Storage VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

Startup Fame
Discover awesome startups. Add yours in seconds and climb the SEO ranks. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Contabo Object Storage logo Contabo Object Storage

S3-compatible cloud object storage with unlimited, free transfer at a fraction of what others charge. Easy migration & predictable billing. Sign up now & save.

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits
  • Contabo Object Storage Contabo Object Storage Homepage
    Contabo Object Storage Homepage //
    2025-05-02
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04

Contabo Object Storage features and specs

  • S3-Compatible
    Compatible with Amazon S3 Standard
  • Always-On DDos Protection
    Automatic detection and mitigation of DDoS attacks
  • Guaranteed Redundancy
    Redundancy and End-to-End Encryption
  • High Performance and Speed
    High-speed throughput with low latency
  • Three Object Storage Regions
    Files and data are secured with guaranteed confidentiality at any of the three available Object Storage Regions (Europe/USA/Asia)

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Contabo Object Storage videos

+ Add

How to set up and use Object Storage by Contabo I Step-by-step tutorial

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to: Host a Static Website on Contabo Object Storage
  • Review - Setting Up Contabo Object Storage On #Vironeer Applications

Commit Together by Github videos

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Contabo Object Storage and Commit Together by Github)

Contabo Object Storage

Commit Together by Github

Cloud Storage
100 100%
Cloud Storage
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
Productivity
100% 100
Object Storage
100 100%
Object Storage
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Contabo Object Storage and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Commit Together by Github seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Contabo Object Storage mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Contabo Object Storage yet. Tracking of Contabo Object Storage recommendations started around May 2025.

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Contabo Object Storage and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage - Storage made simple. Faster than Amazon's S3. Less expensive than Glacier.

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

Hetzner Object Storage - Scalable object storage, S3-compatible and ideal for growing data volumes. Secure and flexible for efficient data storage.

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

IONOS Object Storage - IONOS Object Storage is a convenient, affordable and compliant way to store any amount of static company data. Pay only for what you use.

CommitTasks - A small CLI tool that combines git commit and todo list 🛠📝

Loading...