Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Hurl.dev VS restclient.el

Compare Hurl.dev VS restclient.el and see what are their differences

Mixo
AI-powered website builder that helps you create professional sites in minutes featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Hurl.dev logo Hurl.dev

Hurl is a command line tool that runs HTTP requests defined in a simple plain text format.

restclient.el logo restclient.el

HTTP REST client tool for emacs
  • Hurl.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09
  • restclient.el Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-23

Hurl.dev features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Hurl.dev provides a simple and intuitive interface to work with, making it easy for users to compose and test HTTP requests without dealing with the complexity of more advanced tools.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    It offers powerful scripting capabilities using a straightforward syntax, allowing users to automate HTTP requests efficiently.
  • Open Source
    Hurl.dev being open-source allows users to contribute to the development and improvement of the tool, as well as ensuring transparency and reliability.
  • Flexibility
    The tool supports a wide range of HTTP methods and features, accommodating various testing needs and workflows.
  • Integration
    Hurl.dev can easily integrate into existing CI/CD pipelines, streamlining automated testing processes.

Possible disadvantages of Hurl.dev

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to more complex tools, Hurl.dev might lack some advanced features required for extensive API testing and analysis.
  • Learning Curve for Scripting
    While Hurl.dev provides scripting capabilities, users unfamiliar with the syntax may face an initial learning curve.
  • Community Support
    As a newer tool, it might have a smaller community, which can affect the availability of resources and support.
  • Performance Limitations
    Hurl.dev may not handle very large or complex load testing scenarios as efficiently as dedicated load testing tools.
  • Interface Limitations
    The command-line nature of the tool might not appeal to users who prefer graphical user interfaces for managing HTTP requests.

restclient.el features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    restclient.el allows users to interact with RESTful services from within Emacs, leveraging familiar keybindings and UI, which simplifies the learning curve for Emacs users.
  • Integration with Emacs
    As an Emacs package, it integrates seamlessly with other Emacs features and workflows, such as Org mode for documentation or Magit for version control.
  • Lightweight
    Being an Emacs package, it is relatively lightweight compared to full-fledged GUI REST clients, offering quick installation and minimal resource consumption.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    Users can script and automate their HTTP requests, leveraging Emacs Lisp, which can be more powerful than traditional GUI-based REST clients.

Possible disadvantages of restclient.el

  • Emacs Dependency
    Since it runs within Emacs, users who are not familiar with Emacs might find the setup and usage more challenging compared to standalone applications.
  • Limited Features Compared to GUI Tools
    Compared to dedicated GUI tools like Postman, restclient.el lacks advanced features such as a comprehensive GUI, response visualization, and environment management.
  • Steeper Learning Curve for Non-Emacs Users
    For users not already familiar with Emacs, the need to learn Emacs conventions and keybindings can pose an additional barrier.
  • Less Intuitive for Large API Testing
    Organizing and managing large sets of API endpoints and tests might be less intuitive without a graphical interface or built-in management features.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hurl.dev and restclient.el)

Hurl.dev

restclient.el

API Tools
53 53%
API Tools
47% 47
Developer Tools
52 52%
Developer Tools
48% 48
Command Line Tools
100 100%
Command Line Tools
0% 0
APIs
54 54%
APIs
46% 46

User comments

Share your experience with using Hurl.dev and restclient.el. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hurl.dev should be more popular than restclient.el. It has been mentiond 50 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Hurl.dev mentions (50)

  • Test, Save, and Execute HTTP Requests with Hurl (Or Restclient.el)
    You can see how you can make various asserts here [2] [1]: https://hurl.dev [2]: https://hurl.dev/docs/asserting-response.html. - Source: Hacker News / 24 days ago
  • Rest Easy
    Hi, you may like Hurl [1] it's a cli based on curl to make REST call, add asserts on results, chains requests etc... I'm one of the maintainer [1]: https://hurl.dev. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Show HN: A Fast HTTP Request CLI Powered by HTTL
    It looks similar to https://hurl.dev. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • My Plans In Open Source This Week
    $ echo 'HEAD https://hurl.dev' | hurl --cookie-jar /tmp/a/b/c/out.txt Error: Issue writing to /tmp/a/b/c/out.txt: Os { code: 2, kind: NotFound, message: "No such file or directory" }. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Show HN: Skybear.net – A managed platform automating Synthetic HTTP API testing
    4. OTEL traces generated per script run, exportable and sent to APM products. Thank you, and I hope you find it interesting too! 1. https://hurl.dev. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
View more

restclient.el mentions (6)

  • Emacs Advent Calendar 9: devdocs, code-cells, dREPL, etc.
    Plz-see: Interactive HTTP client, similar to restclient and verb, but using Elisp instead of a special text-based syntax. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Hurl 4.0.0
    Emacs enthusiasts have https://github.com/pashky/restclient.el I see some parallels to Hurl, but having everything inside Emacs is hard to beat, just thinking about using M-x jq-interactivly for json responses ... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Hurl, run and test HTTP requests with plain text
    I recently switch from custom Bash wrappers around curl to restclient.el [1]. It has similar features. Especially nice is the integration with jq for fetching specific data (or inspection of results with jq-mode). And, whoever is inclined to appreciate it, the fact that I can stay within Emacs. No need to get familiar with a new UI/UX. [1]: https://github.com/pashky/restclient.el. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Show HN: Restfox – A web based HTTP client inspired by Insomnia and Postman
    Although I mainly stick with curl or requests due to muscle memory, there's also restclient.el https://github.com/pashky/restclient.el. I imagine having builtin org support is super convenient, thanks for sharing. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Which IDE/Editor is Your Daily driver?
    Right now I am writing a document in org-mode (human readable) and with a bit of help from org-ql I am converting it into json for API consumption, which I am also testing with resclient.el. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hurl.dev and restclient.el, you can also consider the following products

Insomnia REST - Design, debug, test, and mock APIs locally, on Git, or cloud. Build better APIs collaboratively for the most popular protocols with a dev‑friendly UI, built-in automation, and an extensible plugin ecosystem.

Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

Kreya - GUI Client - Kreya is a GUI client for gRPC and REST APIs with innovative features for environments, authorizations and more.

Productivity Power Tools - Extension for Visual Studio - A set of extensions to Visual Studio 2012 Professional (and above) which improves developer productivity.

RapidAPI for Mac - Paw is a REST client for Mac.

Loading...