Software Alternatives & Reviews

HTTP VS IPFS

Compare HTTP VS IPFS and see what are their differences


is an application protocol for distributed, collaborative, and hypermedia information systems.

IPFS is the permanent web. A new peer-to-peer hypermedia protocol.
HTTP Landing Page
HTTP Landing Page
IPFS Landing Page
IPFS Landing Page

HTTP details

Categories
Web Browser Cloud Storage P2P
Website datatracker.ietf.org  

IPFS details

Categories
Cloud Storage File Sharing Office Suites
Website ipfs.io  

HTTP videos

No HTTP videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

IPFS videos

Why IPFS? - Juan Benet

More videos:

  • - Ether-1 Project Review - Decentralized Web Hosting - IPFS Protocol - DAPPS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to HTTP and IPFS)
0
0%
100%
100
100
100%
0%
0
0
0%
100%
100

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, IPFS seems to be a lot more popular than HTTP. While we know about 106 links to IPFS, we've tracked only 4 mentions of HTTP. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on Reddit, HackerNews and some other platforms. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

HTTP mentions (4)

  • HTTP Protocol Overview
    The program you are using to send data to the server may or may not automatically determine the right content-type header for your data, and knowing how to set and check headers is an essential skill. To learn more about the HTTP protocol check out the MDN guide or read the official standard, RFC 7230. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Show HN: Micro HTTP server in 22 lines of C
    It's neat, but I don't believe it is a compliant implementation of HTTP/1.1 (or 1.0). For example, it does not handle percent-encoded characters in the request URI.[1][2] [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7230#section-3.1.1 [2]: https://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.0/spec.html#Request-URI. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Let's Stop Building APIs Around a Network Hack
    This is wrong. HTTP/1.0 had a keep-alive header field as mentioned in the HTTP/1.1 RFC: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#appendix-A.1.2 But in HTTP/1.1 that's the default: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-6.3
       o  If the received protocol is HTTP/1.1 (or later), the connection will persist after the current response; else,.
    - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • An HTTP server in a single .c file
    Context: RFC 2616 and RFC 7230 require CRLF line endings instead of just LF. 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

IPFS mentions (106)

  • Create and host NFTs with 25 lines of code
    We host the images in IPFS because this a peer to peer and a decentralized form of storage, rather than a centralized solution like AWS or Google Cloud. Therefore if AWS goes down or you forget to pay your Cloud subscription, you still have a hosting solution that assigned a unique identifier or content identifier (CID). - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago
  • β€œWith HTTP, you search for locations. With IPFS, you search for content.”
    Sorry, I don't know when you last tried out IPFS, but IPNS does in fact work: https://docs.ipfs.io/concepts/ipns/ Again, I'm not sure when it wasn't working, or when it began working (it's always worked since I've been around), but IPNS has made huge strides, I use it every day. Even https://ipfs.io is using IPNS, it's very popular. - Source: Hacker News / 3 days ago
  • How much dogecoin actually worth? I still dont't understand how it works.
    Another example: https://ipfs.io/ (database example). - Source: Reddit / 6 days ago
  • What is IPFS?
    The easiest way to view the above link is by opening it in your browser through an IPFS Gateway. Simply add https://ipfs.io to the start of the above link and you'll be able to view the page β†’(opens new window). - Source: Reddit / 7 days ago
  • NFTs Can Be Fungible
    > another strange phenomenon is that NFTs which host metadata on IPFS often don't use ipfs:// urls, but rather an explicit https IPFS gateway, which isn't fundamentally that different from some random webserver in terms of what clients are capable of enforcing. [1] https://ipfs.io/ [2] https://twitter.com/moxie/status/1448162369553637376?s=20. - Source: Hacker News / 7 days ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing HTTP and IPFS, you can also consider the following products

mini_httpd - mini_httpd is a small HTTP server for low or medium traffic sites.

Dropbox - Online Sync and File Sharing

micro_httpd - micro_httpd is a very small Unix-based HTTP server.

Syncthing - Syncthing replaces proprietary sync and cloud services with something open, trustworthy and...

thttpd - thttpd is a simple, small, portable, fast, and secure HTTP server.

Google Drive - Access and sync your files anywhere

User reviews

Share your experience with using HTTP and IPFS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Post a review