Based on our record, aerc should be more popular than Hostman. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
No custom domains on the free plan. Hostman. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
If all that is nothing for you, you can also look for less super-dev-focused alternatives that offer just basic hosting like https://hostman.com (I did not test or use this before!)... "old-school" static hosting providers are usually "create account, get SFTP login and upload with a client" and/or even have a user interface to upload files. Source: over 1 year ago
Hostman.com — Deploy up to 3 static sites from your GitHub repository for free. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
I found hostman.com lately, "static" websites like the one you are describing are free to host, and you can link your own domain to it. Source: about 3 years ago
We at Hostman are now looking for a win-win partnership on a revenue-share basis. Source: about 3 years ago
You have some points, for some I do think it isn't as bad as you write. FWIW, some comments inline. > - You can't subscribe to a single PR/bug/feature-request thread. Subscription to the mailing list is all-or-nothing. And no, setting up email filters is not a reasonable solution. You can use tools like public-inbox or lei, the former is hosted for bigger projects on https://lore.kernel.org/ If you're interested,... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
> Another problem is how badly email threading is displayed in these clients. Email UI is still abysmal. Fair point. However, given that the current alternative is "use another service entirely (e.g. GitHub)", I think it would be fair to assume that devs could choose a good e-mail client and learn how to format such e-mails correctly. It works for Linux, for instance. I started using Aerc, and I love it:... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
For fans of Mutt/NeoMutt looking to try something new, I've been getting a lot of mileage out of Aerc[1] and can recommend it as a somewhat more approachable alternative for the Mutt-curious. [1] https://aerc-mail.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Try aerc, I recently set it up and it was really easy to do. The only tricky part was making it so my password is read from the KDE wallet instead of being stored as plain text in the config file. Source: over 1 year ago
I'm not sure how much longer, but at least for me aerc still works with Outlook e-mails. Source: over 1 year ago
Porter - Heroku that runs in your own cloud
Mu4e - Starting with version 0.9.8, mu provides an emacs-based e-mail client which uses mu as its back-end: mu4e.
8base - Rethink development using 8base's low-code development platform.
NeoMutt - NeoMutt is a command-line mail reader. It's a version of https://alternativeto.
Heroku - Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.
Mutt - Mutt is a small but very powerful text-based mail client for Unix operating systems.