Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Heroku VS SockJS

Compare Heroku VS SockJS and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Heroku logo Heroku

Agile deployment platform for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, and Scala. Setup takes only minutes and deploys are instant through git. Leave tedious server maintenance to Heroku and focus on your code.

SockJS logo SockJS

SockJS is a browser JavaScript library that provides a WebSocket-like object.
  • Heroku Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05
  • SockJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24

Heroku features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Heroku offers an extremely user-friendly interface and a high level of abstraction, making it easy for developers to deploy, manage, and scale applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.
  • Quick Deployment
    One of Heroku’s strongest points is the ability to deploy applications quickly using Git. Developers can push their code to Heroku with a simple command, streamlining the entire process.
  • Scalability
    Heroku provides effortless scaling options by allowing developers to add more dynos (containers) with a single command to handle increased traffic and workload.
  • Add-Ons Ecosystem
    Heroku offers a rich ecosystem of add-ons, such as databases, caching, monitoring, and more, which can be easily integrated into applications to extend their functionality.
  • Automatic Updates
    Heroku automatically handles operating system and server updates, allowing developers to focus solely on their application code rather than maintenance tasks.
  • Free Tier
    Heroku offers a free tier with sufficient resources to host small projects and learn the platform without incurring costs, making it accessible for beginners and small-scale applications.

Possible disadvantages of Heroku

  • Cost
    While Heroku offers a free tier, the costs can quickly add up for larger applications and professional use. Paid plans and additional dynos or add-ons can become expensive.
  • Performance
    Heroku’s performance can sometimes be suboptimal compared to other cloud providers, particularly when running high-performance or resource-intensive applications.
  • Limited Control
    Heroku abstracts away a lot of infrastructure management, which can be a downside for developers who need fine-grained control over their environments and configurations.
  • Dyno Sleeping
    Applications running on Heroku’s free tier experience 'dyno sleeping,' where the application goes to sleep after 30 minutes of inactivity, causing a delay when it wakes up after receiving a new request.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Relying heavily on Heroku’s ecosystem and platform-specific features can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to migrate to another platform if needed.
  • Add-On Costs
    The costs for add-ons can also become significant, as many useful features and integrations require paid add-ons, increasing the overall expense.

SockJS features and specs

  • Cross-browser Compatibility
    SockJS provides a consistent WebSocket-like API that works across all modern browsers, including fallback options for older browsers that don't support WebSockets.
  • Fallback Options
    SockJS automatically uses the best-available transport method, such as JSONP, XHR streaming, or XHR polling, ensuring connectivity even in challenging network environments.
  • Reliability
    By offering multiple transport methods, SockJS provides reliable real-time communication even when WebSocket connections might be unstable or unsupported.
  • Ease of Use
    SockJS abstracts the complexity of managing various transport protocols, allowing developers to focus on implementing application logic rather than handling connection details.
  • Server Support
    SockJS is supported by several server-side implementations in different programming languages, enabling flexibility in choosing backend technologies.

Possible disadvantages of SockJS

  • Overhead
    The additional abstraction layer and fallback mechanisms may introduce some overhead compared to using native WebSockets directly, impacting performance to some extent.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up SockJS with proper fallback handling and configuring the server-side components might be more complex than using native WebSockets, especially for simple use cases.
  • Less Control
    Developers have less control over the specific transport protocols being used, which might be a disadvantage in scenarios where such control is necessary for optimization or monitoring purposes.
  • Potential Latency
    Using fallback transports like polling can introduce higher latency compared to native WebSocket connections, which might not be suitable for highly time-sensitive applications.
  • Project Maintenance
    As an open-source project, SockJS relies on community support for maintenance and updates. This could pose a risk if development and support decline over time.

Analysis of Heroku

Overall verdict

  • Heroku is a solid choice for developers seeking a straightforward, cloud-based solution for deploying and managing applications. However, it may not be the most cost-effective option for large-scale or data-intensive applications.

Why this product is good

  • Heroku is a popular platform as a service (PaaS) due to its ease of use, fast deployment process, and robust support for multiple programming languages. It allows developers to focus on building applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. Heroku offers scaling capabilities, a wide variety of add-ons, and a strong developer community.

Recommended for

    Heroku is recommended for startups, small to medium-sized applications, hobby projects, and developers who value ease of use and quick deployment cycles. It is particularly suited for those who are developing web applications in languages such as Ruby, Node.js, Python, and others supported by the platform.

Heroku videos

+ Add

What is Heroku | Ask a Dev Episode 14

More videos:

SockJS videos

No SockJS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Heroku and SockJS)

Heroku

SockJS

Cloud Computing
100 100%
Cloud Computing
0% 0
Developer Tools
94 94%
Developer Tools
6% 6
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
Cloud Hosting
0% 0
Mobile Push Messaging
0 0%
Mobile Push Messaging
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Heroku and SockJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Heroku and SockJS

Heroku Reviews

  1. mark-mercer
    Useful Cloud Platform

    Great service to build, run and manage applications entirely in the cloud!

    🏁 Competitors: Amazon AWS, Dokku on Digital Ocean, Firebase
    👍 Pros:    Easy user interface|Good customer service|Multi-language cloud application platform
    👎 Cons:    Limitation with some addons|Low network performance
  2. jamestelford
    · Full Stack Developer at OutDev ·
    🏁 Competitors: Docker, Amazon AWS
    👍 Pros:    Powerful development environments|Great value for the money|Great customer support|Paas
10 Top Firebase Alternatives to Ignite Your Development in 2024
Heroku’s focus on simplicity and developer experience makes it a perfect fit for those who want to focus on building their apps, not babysitting servers. Startups and small businesses, in particular, can benefit from Heroku’s ability to accelerate development and deployment, allowing them to get their ideas to market faster.
Source: genezio.com
2023 Firebase Alternatives: Top 10 Open-Source & Free
Heroku Postgres – Majority of businesses like Heroku because of its SQL database support. Yes, PostgreSQL as a service is an appealing product of this PaaS vendor with quick deployment approaches.
Source: digitalcruch.com
5 Free Heroku Alternatives with Free Plan for Developers
Koyeb is a decent alternative to Heroku that you can consider for hosting or deploying your web apps and APIs. It has all the features of Heroku that you will need for your projects. So far, I have not encountered an importer tool for migrating Heroku deployments but I am sure doing that manually will not be that hard. Just like Heroku it offers you an intuitive web UI as...
Source: www.ilovefreesoftware.com
Choosing the best Next.js hosting platform
However, there are a few disadvantages to Heroku. First of all, despite its build pack, Heroku will run your project as a Node.js application. As a result, you will lose some of Next.js’ most interesting features, such as Incremental Static Regeneration. Analytics are replaced by metrics and measured throughput, response time, and memory usage (only on paid plans).
Source: blog.logrocket.com
Top 10 Netlify Alternatives
Heroku is another alternative to Netlify that doesn’t only host static websites but has the ability to host dynamic websites. This PaaS platform was launched in 2007 and conferred highly scalable features to deploy, host and launch applications.
Source: blog.back4app.com

SockJS Reviews

We have no reviews of SockJS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Heroku seems to be a lot more popular than SockJS. While we know about 73 links to Heroku, we've tracked only 2 mentions of SockJS. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Heroku mentions (73)

View more

SockJS mentions (2)

  • WebSockets and Node.js - testing WS and SockJS by building a web app
    SockJS is a library that mimics the native WebSockets API. Additionally, it will fall back to HTTP whenever a WebSocket fails to connect, or if the browser being used doesn’t support WebSockets. Like WS, SockJS requires a server counterpart; its maintainers provide both a JavaScript client library and a Node.js server library. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Top WebSocket libraries for Node.js in 2022
    SockJS is a JavaScript library that provides communication between the client and the server in a way similar to the native WebSockets API. SockJS functions with a server counterpart in the form of sockjs-node and SockJS-client, a JavaScript client library. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Heroku and SockJS, you can also consider the following products

DigitalOcean - Simplifying cloud hosting. Deploy an SSD cloud server in 55 seconds.

Socket.io - Realtime application framework (Node.JS server)

Linode - We make it simple to develop, deploy, and scale cloud infrastructure at the best price-to-performance ratio in the market.

UbSub - Quickly and easily distribute your events between services. See a log stream and debug events before they even get to your services.

Amazon AWS - Amazon Web Services offers reliable, scalable, and inexpensive cloud computing services. Free to join, pay only for what you use.

SocketCluster - An open, scalable realtime engine for Node.js

Loading...