Based on our record, reStructuredText should be more popular than Hakyll. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Others have mentioned static site generators. I like Hakyll [1] because it can tightly integrate with Pandoc [2] and allows you to develop custom solutions if your needs ever grow. [1]: https://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/ [2]: https://pandoc.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Honestly, I've had a great experience with Hakyll for static site generation. There's a bit of a learning curve to effectively use the library/framework, but in my opinion the learning curve is much lower than Yesod/Fay. If all you need is to build static website pages, I'd suggest Hakyll. Source: almost 2 years ago
Love SSGs too! Came here to share praise for Hakyll[1], for people with an FP leaning. Predictably, it's not easy to get started, but once you're into it the power of building your own arbitrary content "compilers" (and template extensions etc etc) is pretty impressive. [1] https://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Hi there. A friend of mine wanted to publish a blog/site at both French and English. I told him about static generators and Hakyll from u/jaspervdj but the internationalization piece was missing. Of course there are other generators with internationalization but... Well here is one for Hakyll. * Generator source code * Use case and its source code --- If it already exists, please hide that fact from me. If not... Source: over 2 years ago
This info is relevant because Hakyll application requires to be complied before it generates the pages, and the compilation process of Haskell is a pretty expensive (computationally saying). Although, the executable is incredible fast, due to great work made by the compiler. This processing cost will be discussed soon. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Markup language: Markup language is used to write documents in a way that distinguishes them from plain text. Most SSGs utilize lightweight markup languages, such as Markdown. However, alternatives like AsciiDoc, Textile, and ReStructuredText are also used. These lightweight languages simplify content creation and are converted into HTML during the site generation process. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Uses Sphinx, reStructuredText And the sphinx-rtd-theme for writing, building And rendering the documentation. Source: 8 months ago
If we're dreaming, ReStructed Text support. Source: about 1 year ago
You can always switch to rst¹ and sphinx² to produce html/pdf came join the dark side, we have tables³ :) 1. https://docutils.sourceforge.io/rst.html. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
ReStrutucturedText is still useful to look at for inspiration here. It had the concepts of extensible metadata ("field lists"), spans ("interpreted text"), and blocks ("directives"). Including things like applying metadata to spans (using essentially Footnotes to provide field lists to interpreted text sections, like but better than Markdown's reference style for hyperlinks which almost no one uses but were much... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
Asciidoctor - In the spirit of free software, everyone is encouraged to help improve this project.
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
Markdown by DaringFireball - Text-to-HTML conversion tool/syntax for web writers, by John Gruber
Grav - The modern open source flat-file CMS
Org mode - Org: an Emacs Mode for Notes, Planning, and Authoring