No Hakyll videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Pinegrow should be more popular than Hakyll. It has been mentiond 24 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Others have mentioned static site generators. I like Hakyll [1] because it can tightly integrate with Pandoc [2] and allows you to develop custom solutions if your needs ever grow. [1]: https://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/ [2]: https://pandoc.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Honestly, I've had a great experience with Hakyll for static site generation. There's a bit of a learning curve to effectively use the library/framework, but in my opinion the learning curve is much lower than Yesod/Fay. If all you need is to build static website pages, I'd suggest Hakyll. Source: almost 2 years ago
Love SSGs too! Came here to share praise for Hakyll[1], for people with an FP leaning. Predictably, it's not easy to get started, but once you're into it the power of building your own arbitrary content "compilers" (and template extensions etc etc) is pretty impressive. [1] https://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Hi there. A friend of mine wanted to publish a blog/site at both French and English. I told him about static generators and Hakyll from u/jaspervdj but the internationalization piece was missing. Of course there are other generators with internationalization but... Well here is one for Hakyll. * Generator source code * Use case and its source code --- If it already exists, please hide that fact from me. If not... Source: over 2 years ago
This info is relevant because Hakyll application requires to be complied before it generates the pages, and the compilation process of Haskell is a pretty expensive (computationally saying). Although, the executable is incredible fast, due to great work made by the compiler. This processing cost will be discussed soon. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Check Pinegrow. It's perfect builder for someone who know how to code. You will need to get used to it, but once you are familiar with it, its super great :) Https://pinegrow.com/. Source: 10 months ago
Figma is a design/prototyping tool. So probably yes, but it's not directly resolving your end result. Webflow is SaaS, specifically a visual builder for websites. The two are not really comparable in which to choose. A better comparison would be Figma or XD. And for Webflow, something like Pinegrow, or CofeeCup's Responsive Site Designer. Would be better comparisons. Source: 11 months ago
5+ year web flow dev here! i’ve been heavily contemplating a move to pinegrow or the “open source webflow” webstudio. Source: 11 months ago
I also don't have much experience with DW but something that I have seen do similar stuff is pinegrow which is quite cheaper. It has free trial so maybe you could see if it will fit your needs. Source: over 1 year ago
Pinegrow is pretty awesome and free and something I'm increasingly working with. Source: over 1 year ago
Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
Adobe Dreamweaver - Adobe Dreamweaver is a proprietary web development tool developed by Adobe Systems.
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
Webflow - Build dynamic, responsive websites in your browser. Launch with a click. Or export your squeaky-clean code to host wherever you'd like. Discover the professional website builder made for designers.
Grav - The modern open source flat-file CMS
Bootstrap Studio - Powerful desktop app for creating responsive websites using the Bootstrap framework