omg.lol might be a bit more popular than Hakyll. We know about 7 links to it since March 2021 and only 6 links to Hakyll. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Others have mentioned static site generators. I like Hakyll [1] because it can tightly integrate with Pandoc [2] and allows you to develop custom solutions if your needs ever grow. [1]: https://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/ [2]: https://pandoc.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Honestly, I've had a great experience with Hakyll for static site generation. There's a bit of a learning curve to effectively use the library/framework, but in my opinion the learning curve is much lower than Yesod/Fay. If all you need is to build static website pages, I'd suggest Hakyll. Source: almost 2 years ago
Love SSGs too! Came here to share praise for Hakyll[1], for people with an FP leaning. Predictably, it's not easy to get started, but once you're into it the power of building your own arbitrary content "compilers" (and template extensions etc etc) is pretty impressive. [1] https://jaspervdj.be/hakyll/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Hi there. A friend of mine wanted to publish a blog/site at both French and English. I told him about static generators and Hakyll from u/jaspervdj but the internationalization piece was missing. Of course there are other generators with internationalization but... Well here is one for Hakyll. * Generator source code * Use case and its source code --- If it already exists, please hide that fact from me. If not... Source: over 2 years ago
This info is relevant because Hakyll application requires to be complied before it generates the pages, and the compilation process of Haskell is a pretty expensive (computationally saying). Although, the executable is incredible fast, due to great work made by the compiler. This processing cost will be discussed soon. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
I personally am more interested in micro-hosting services like omg.lol[1]. I do self host a few services, but they are generally on VPNs that have smaller attack surfaces. I don't think it's practical for most individuals to maintain secure web servers, but I think most people can pay a very small amount of money to get most of the benefit. [1] https://home.omg.lol/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 days ago
Omg.lol (https://home.omg.lol/) has not been mentioned. You get quite a few nice bonuses from it (like community!) for a very reasonable, imo, $20USD a year. At least give it a look my friend! - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
I have a relatively uncommon surname, and I was eventually able to get the surname.com At this time, I have the most basic G Suite account using the domain name, so I can have myfirst@lastname.com, although I am not tied down to this. I just did it because after playing with proton, fastmail, and others, gmail was the most reliable email. If I want to share the opportunity to have firstname@lastname.com with my... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Omg.lol (where I point my domain) and host most of my site content recently launched support for /now pages. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Why is it so alike with https://omg.lol/ ? Source: about 1 year ago
Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
InboxKitten - An open-source, disposable email service 💌
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
Revize CMS - Revize is a web-based content management software designed for municipalities.
Grav - The modern open source flat-file CMS
Margin - An email alias to stop spam once and for all