Software Alternatives & Reviews

Gunicorn VS Shell In A Box

Compare Gunicorn VS Shell In A Box and see what are their differences

Gunicorn logo Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a Python WSGI HTTP Server for UNIX.

Shell In A Box logo Shell In A Box

Shell In A Box is a web based AJAX terminal emulator that can export arbitrary command line tools...
  • Gunicorn Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-11
  • Shell In A Box Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-06

Gunicorn videos

Lesson 6 - Gunicorn

More videos:

Shell In A Box videos

No Shell In A Box videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Gunicorn and Shell In A Box)
Web And Application Servers
Server Management
0 0%
100% 100
Web Servers
100 100%
0% 0
SSH
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Gunicorn and Shell In A Box. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Gunicorn seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 31 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Gunicorn mentions (31)

  • Simplify Web App Development: Code Lite, Create Big!
    And Streamlit itself so far does not support Gunicorn, so its vertical scalability is limited. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Build a Vite 5 backend integration with Flask
    It's also worth mentioning that this Flask application is not production-ready. At the very least, you'll want to put an application server like Gunicorn in front of it (example in my repo). You'll also want to use a web server like NGINX to serve assets, or use a combination of WhiteNoise and a CDN to deliver assets. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Improving upon my OpenTelemetry Tracing demo
    Every time I started the Flask service, it showed a warning in red that it shouldn't be used in production. While it's unrelated to OpenTelemetry, and though nobody complained, I was not too fond of it. For this reason, I added a "real" HTTP server. I chose Gunicorn, for no other reason than because my knowledge of the Python ecosystem is still shallow. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Setting up Django in a Better Way in 5 Minutes and Understanding How It Works
    The static files are managed with whitenoise, Gunicorn is used for the WSGI server and Sentry is used for error monitoring and reporting in production. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Build a CI/CD pipeline for Flask apps using GitHub Actions
    Now, we can create the Procfile for Heroku. The Procfile contains the command that will be run once the application is deployed on Heroku. You can do this by creating a new file named Procfile and pasting the following command. We will be using Gunicorn to run the application instead of the default Flask server. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

Shell In A Box mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Shell In A Box yet. Tracking of Shell In A Box recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Gunicorn and Shell In A Box, you can also consider the following products

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Wetty - Terminal over HTTP and HTTPS.

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Bastillion - Bastillion is an open-source web-based SSH console that centrally manages administrative access to systems.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

SSHy - SSHy is a HTML5 SSHv2 web client implementing E2E encryption that runs well on modern web browsers.