Software Alternatives & Reviews

Gunicorn VS Wetty

Compare Gunicorn VS Wetty and see what are their differences

Gunicorn logo Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a Python WSGI HTTP Server for UNIX.

Wetty logo Wetty

Terminal over HTTP and HTTPS.
  • Gunicorn Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-11
  • Wetty Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18

Gunicorn videos

Lesson 6 - Gunicorn

More videos:

Wetty videos

Phatkat Collections : Wetty Pro Laser Hair Removal Review For Men

More videos:

  • Review - At Home DIY Laser Hair Removal? Wetty Laser Hair Remover Initial Thoughts
  • Review - Wetty Pro IPL men’s hair removal UNBOXING

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Gunicorn and Wetty)
Web And Application Servers
SSH
0 0%
100% 100
Web Servers
100 100%
0% 0
Server Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Gunicorn and Wetty. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Gunicorn should be more popular than Wetty. It has been mentiond 31 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Gunicorn mentions (31)

  • Simplify Web App Development: Code Lite, Create Big!
    And Streamlit itself so far does not support Gunicorn, so its vertical scalability is limited. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Build a Vite 5 backend integration with Flask
    It's also worth mentioning that this Flask application is not production-ready. At the very least, you'll want to put an application server like Gunicorn in front of it (example in my repo). You'll also want to use a web server like NGINX to serve assets, or use a combination of WhiteNoise and a CDN to deliver assets. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Improving upon my OpenTelemetry Tracing demo
    Every time I started the Flask service, it showed a warning in red that it shouldn't be used in production. While it's unrelated to OpenTelemetry, and though nobody complained, I was not too fond of it. For this reason, I added a "real" HTTP server. I chose Gunicorn, for no other reason than because my knowledge of the Python ecosystem is still shallow. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Setting up Django in a Better Way in 5 Minutes and Understanding How It Works
    The static files are managed with whitenoise, Gunicorn is used for the WSGI server and Sentry is used for error monitoring and reporting in production. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Build a CI/CD pipeline for Flask apps using GitHub Actions
    Now, we can create the Procfile for Heroku. The Procfile contains the command that will be run once the application is deployed on Heroku. You can do this by creating a new file named Procfile and pasting the following command. We will be using Gunicorn to run the application instead of the default Flask server. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

Wetty mentions (5)

  • OSS for opening an on demand shell instance from a web browser?
    Everyone is telling you Remote Desktop solutions but I think you're just looking for is Wetty https://github.com/butlerx/wetty or Bastillion https://www.bastillion.io. Source: about 1 year ago
  • How to expose the server terminal(truenas or any linux) with Traefik?
    You’re already running docker. Install Wetty. Works great. Make sure you have strong strong Auth though. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Managing SSH Sessions Doesn't Have to be a Royal Pain
    Can RGNets look into integrating Wetty, terminal over https (https://github.com/butlerx/wetty) where we can ssh to devices it manages from the fleet or the rXg itself without giving direct shell access to users. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Charm – tools to make the command line glamorous
    Ttyd is a nice little web terminal: https://github.com/tsl0922/ttyd Just small, fast, low fuss C-based executable. Wetty is another good option if you want to run a nodejs app: https://github.com/butlerx/wetty Both use xterm.js for the client terminal, which is these days the only game in town for a web terminal (it's what VS code and many other electron apps use too). It's quite good. Do be aware though that... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Example of a web app interacting with backend process via terminal-like interface?
    Hello, Does anyone know of an open source project/web app/library, written in Haskell, that makes terminal interface accessible via browser? An example of what I'd like to achieve: Start R repl process withing a docker container on the backend (e.g. `docker run -it --rm rocker/r-base`) and allow user to interact with it using terminal-like interface from their browser (with stuff like TAB completion working... Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Gunicorn and Wetty, you can also consider the following products

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Shell In A Box - Shell In A Box is a web based AJAX terminal emulator that can export arbitrary command line tools...

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Bastillion - Bastillion is an open-source web-based SSH console that centrally manages administrative access to systems.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

SSHy - SSHy is a HTML5 SSHv2 web client implementing E2E encryption that runs well on modern web browsers.