Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Google Cloud Run VS DaemonStack

Compare Google Cloud Run VS DaemonStack and see what are their differences

Google Cloud Run logo Google Cloud Run

Bringing serverless to containers

DaemonStack logo DaemonStack

Run compute workload across Cloud Providers. Alternative to AWS Batch.
  • Google Cloud Run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-16
Not present

Daestro empowers you to seamlessly run your compute workloads across a multitude of cloud providers, including Vultr, DigitalOcean, Linode, AWS, OVHCloud, Azure, and GCP, as well as your own self-hosted compute infrastructure. This cloud-agnostic platform allows you to execute batch jobs using your existing cloud accounts, giving you complete control and flexibility.

  • Secure API Integration: Provide your API tokens for your chosen providers, which are securely encrypted with AES 256 for storage.
  • Flexible Job Definitions: Create Job Definitions using Docker images, enabling you to run virtually any type of job.
  • Customizable Job Parameters: Define commands, command parameters, and environment variables for precise job control.
  • Programmatic Job Submission: Submit jobs programmatically via API for automation and integration.
  • Real-time Monitoring: View real-time job logs and track comprehensive compute metrics (CPU and memory utilization).
  • Log Export: Export container logs for analysis and debugging.
  • Job Scheduling: Schedule jobs for later execution.
  • Cron Jobs: Set up cron jobs for recurring tasks.

DaemonStack

$ Details
freemium $29.0 / Monthly (Pro)
Release Date
2025 February
Startup details
Country
India
State
Chhattisgarh
City
Bhatapara
Founder(s)
Vivek Shukla
Employees
1 - 9

Google Cloud Run features and specs

  • Scalability
    Google Cloud Run automatically scales the number of container instances based on incoming requests, ensuring optimal resource usage and performance.
  • Ease of Use
    Cloud Run makes it simple to deploy and manage containers, with minimal configuration required. The platform supports popular languages and frameworks.
  • Serverless
    Cloud Run abstracts away server management, letting you focus on writing code without worrying about infrastructure provisioning or maintenance.
  • Cost-Effective
    Customers only pay for the exact resources they use, thanks to per-request billing, making it a cost-effective option for variable workloads.
  • Integration
    Seamless integration with other Google Cloud services like BigQuery, Cloud Pub/Sub, and Google Kubernetes Engine enhances functionality and data handling capabilities.
  • Custom Domains and SSL
    Cloud Run offers support for custom domains and automatically manages SSL/TLS certificates, ensuring secure communication for your services.

Possible disadvantages of Google Cloud Run

  • Cold Starts
    Due to its serverless nature, Cloud Run can experience latency during cold starts, which may impact performance for time-sensitive applications.
  • Limited Execution Time
    There is a maximum request timeout of 15 minutes, which may not be suitable for long-running processes or tasks that require extended execution time.
  • Complex Pricing Model
    Although cost-effective for many use cases, the pricing model can be complex and may require careful cost management and monitoring to avoid unexpected expenses.
  • Limited Regional Availability
    Cloud Run may not be available in all regions, which can limit its use for applications requiring specific geographic distribution or compliance with regional regulations.
  • Dependency on Containerization
    Cloud Run requires applications to be containerized, which might necessitate additional effort for those not already familiar with Docker or other container technologies.
  • No Stateful Processing
    Being a stateless platform, Cloud Run is not ideal for applications requiring persistent state between requests, potentially necessitating additional services (e.g., databases) to manage state.

DaemonStack features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Google Cloud Run and DaemonStack)
Cloud Computing
97 97%
3% 3
Developer Tools
94 94%
6% 6
Cloud Hosting
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Infrastructure
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Google Cloud Run and DaemonStack.

What makes your product unique?

DaemonStack's answer:

DaemonStack let's you run your compute workload across cloud providers. That enables user to not depend on any one cloud provider.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

DaemonStack's answer:

DaemonStack is cloud agnostic. You can take advantage of all cloud providers by using DaemonStack.

How would you describe your primary audience?

DaemonStack's answer:

Developers, DevOps, People who need HPC, etc.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

DaemonStack's answer:

Backend is build on Rust. Frontend is SvelteKit. Database used is Postgres.

User comments

Share your experience with using Google Cloud Run and DaemonStack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Google Cloud Run and DaemonStack

Google Cloud Run Reviews

Top 12 Kubernetes Alternatives to Choose From in 2023
So if anyone is looking for a flexible and cost-efficient platform for running containers on Google Cloud, then Google Cloud Run is great.
Source: humalect.com

DaemonStack Reviews

We have no reviews of DaemonStack yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Cloud Run seems to be a lot more popular than DaemonStack. While we know about 89 links to Google Cloud Run, we've tracked only 2 mentions of DaemonStack. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Google Cloud Run mentions (89)

  • Comparing Prices: AWS Fargate vs Azure Container Apps vs Google Cloud Run
    AWS Fargate, Google Cloud Run and Azure Container Apps offer services to deploy containers serverless in the cloud. The three providers are the biggest in the industry, but how do their prices compare? One thing all 3 providers have in common: Their pricing is pretty complicated and it can be hard to keep the overview. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Google Cloud Run vs Sliplane - Comparison of two container hosting services
    Google Cloud Run (GCR) and Sliplane both simplify deployment, management, and scaling of containerized applications. However, there are some key differences, and both platforms serve different users and use cases. Let's compare them side by side. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Why aren't we all serverless yet?
    >Something I’m still having trouble believing is that complex workflows are going to move to e.g. AWS Lambda rather than stateless containers orchestrated by e.g. Amazon EKS. I think 0-1 it makes sense, but operating/scaling efficiently seems hard. […] This isn't really saying anything about serverless though. The issue here is not with serverless but that Lambda wants you to break up your server into multiple... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Top 8 Docker Alternatives to Consider in 2025
    Google Cloud Run offers a serverless platform for running containers, providing automatic scaling and management of containerized applications. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Day 3: What is Docker and why should I care?
    Most cloud platforms support Docker containers. Sliplane, Fly.io, AWS, Google Cloud, etc. This means that you can easily switch between cloud providers if you want to, without having to change your software. If you ever migrated from one cloud provider to another, you probably know how much work this can be. With Docker, you can just take your container image and run it on the new platform. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

DaemonStack mentions (2)

  • Ask HN: What are you working on? (April 2025)
    Working on adding Job schedule and cron features in Daestro[1]. About Daestro: Daestro is workload orchestrator that can run compute jobs across cloud providers and on your own compute as well. More like cloud agnostic batch jobs or step functions. [1]: https://daestro.com. - Source: Hacker News / 11 days ago
  • Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (February 2025)
    A cloud agnostic platform to run your compute workloads across cloud providers. Currently supports Vultr and DigitalOcean. More cloud providers coming soon. Will also release support for on-prem. Daestro - https://daestro.com. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Google Cloud Run and DaemonStack, you can also consider the following products

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service

AWS Batch - AWS Batch enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch computing jobs on AWS.

Fission.io - Fission.io is a serverless framework for Kubernetes that supports many concepts such as event triggers, parallel execution, and statelessness.

Resume YaY - Free AI Resume Builder, no signup, and no login required. Build your resume in minutes and download it in high-quality and ATS-friendly PDF format.

Spot.io - Build web, mobile and IoT applications using AWS Lambda and API Gateway, Azure Functions, Google Cloud Functions, and more.

OnlineOrNot - Uptime monitoring for software teams (even teams of one).