Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AWS Batch VS Google Cloud Run

Compare AWS Batch VS Google Cloud Run and see what are their differences

AWS Batch logo AWS Batch

AWS Batch enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch computing jobs on AWS.

Google Cloud Run logo Google Cloud Run

Bringing serverless to containers
  • AWS Batch Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-21
  • Google Cloud Run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-16

AWS Batch features and specs

  • Scalability
    AWS Batch automatically provisions the optimal quantity and type of compute resources based on the volume and specific resource requirements of the batch jobs submitted.
  • Cost-Effectiveness
    By using AWS Batch, you only pay for the resources you consume, and it provides integration with Spot Instances which can significantly lower costs.
  • No Infrastructure Management
    AWS Batch removes the need to manage server clusters or other infrastructure, allowing users to focus entirely on jobs and workloads.
  • Flexible Job Definitions
    Users can easily specify job definitions to model their machine learning, batch processing, or other computational tasks, allowing for flexibility in resource allocation.
  • Integration with AWS Services
    AWS Batch integrates with various AWS services like Amazon CloudWatch, AWS Lambda, and AWS IAM to provide a comprehensive and secure batch processing solution.

Possible disadvantages of AWS Batch

  • Complexity
    Setting up and configuring AWS Batch can be complex for new users unfamiliar with AWS services, requiring a learning curve.
  • Limited to AWS Ecosystem
    AWS Batch is deeply integrated into the AWS ecosystem, which might not be ideal for users looking for a multi-cloud strategy or those using different cloud service providers.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Heavy reliance on AWS Batch can lead to vendor lock-in, making it potentially difficult to migrate workloads to other platforms if needed.
  • Potential for Hidden Costs
    While AWS Batch can be cost-effective, there is the potential for unexpected costs if jobs are not efficiently managed or optimized, especially when scaling up resources.
  • Limited Control Over Infrastructure
    Since AWS Batch manages infrastructure automatically, users have limited control over the underlying compute resources, which may not be suitable for all use cases.

Google Cloud Run features and specs

  • Scalability
    Google Cloud Run automatically scales the number of container instances based on incoming requests, ensuring optimal resource usage and performance.
  • Ease of Use
    Cloud Run makes it simple to deploy and manage containers, with minimal configuration required. The platform supports popular languages and frameworks.
  • Serverless
    Cloud Run abstracts away server management, letting you focus on writing code without worrying about infrastructure provisioning or maintenance.
  • Cost-Effective
    Customers only pay for the exact resources they use, thanks to per-request billing, making it a cost-effective option for variable workloads.
  • Integration
    Seamless integration with other Google Cloud services like BigQuery, Cloud Pub/Sub, and Google Kubernetes Engine enhances functionality and data handling capabilities.
  • Custom Domains and SSL
    Cloud Run offers support for custom domains and automatically manages SSL/TLS certificates, ensuring secure communication for your services.

Possible disadvantages of Google Cloud Run

  • Cold Starts
    Due to its serverless nature, Cloud Run can experience latency during cold starts, which may impact performance for time-sensitive applications.
  • Limited Execution Time
    There is a maximum request timeout of 15 minutes, which may not be suitable for long-running processes or tasks that require extended execution time.
  • Complex Pricing Model
    Although cost-effective for many use cases, the pricing model can be complex and may require careful cost management and monitoring to avoid unexpected expenses.
  • Limited Regional Availability
    Cloud Run may not be available in all regions, which can limit its use for applications requiring specific geographic distribution or compliance with regional regulations.
  • Dependency on Containerization
    Cloud Run requires applications to be containerized, which might necessitate additional effort for those not already familiar with Docker or other container technologies.
  • No Stateful Processing
    Being a stateless platform, Cloud Run is not ideal for applications requiring persistent state between requests, potentially necessitating additional services (e.g., databases) to manage state.

AWS Batch videos

How AWS Batch Works

More videos:

  • Review - Live from the London Loft | AWS Batch: Simplifying Batch Computing in the Cloud
  • Review - AWS re:Invent 2018: AWS Batch & How AQR leverages AWS to Identify New Investment Signals (CMP372)

Google Cloud Run videos

No Google Cloud Run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AWS Batch and Google Cloud Run)
Cloud Computing
20 20%
80% 80
Cloud Hosting
25 25%
75% 75
Development
40 40%
60% 60
Developer Tools
15 15%
85% 85

User comments

Share your experience with using AWS Batch and Google Cloud Run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AWS Batch and Google Cloud Run

AWS Batch Reviews

Python & ETL 2020: A List and Comparison of the Top Python ETL Tools
AWS Batch: This is used for batch computing jobs on AWS resources. It has insane scalability and is well-suited for engineers look to do large compute jobs.
Source: www.xplenty.com

Google Cloud Run Reviews

Top 12 Kubernetes Alternatives to Choose From in 2023
So if anyone is looking for a flexible and cost-efficient platform for running containers on Google Cloud, then Google Cloud Run is great.
Source: humalect.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Cloud Run should be more popular than AWS Batch. It has been mentiond 89 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AWS Batch mentions (14)

  • Looking for a decent (self hostable) program to orchestrate scripts, notify on failures, etc
    After moving off Jenkins, I moved everything to AWS Batch with Fargate. This works quite well, but it is proving to be a little expensive, as I have to pay for:. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Hosting strategy suggestions
    If you're looking for more control over your infrastructure and want to run a full computing environment, EC2 might be the right choice for you. With EC2, you have complete control over the operating system, network, and storage, which can be useful if you need to install custom software or use specific hardware configurations. Additionally, EC2 + Batch processing provide a wider range of instance types, including... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Questions for bioinformatics researchers that use AWS
    AWS Batch is the equivalent of a university cluster you submit to with slurm/sge/lsf/etc. But does not use those schedulers as AWS has their own. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Scheduling "Fetch & Run" Batch Jobs with AWS Batch and CloudWatch Rules
    Developers frequently use batch computing to access significant amounts of processing power. You may perform batch computing workloads in the AWS Cloud with the aid of AWS Batch, a fully managed service provided by AWS. It is a powerful solution that can plan, schedule, and execute containerized batch or machine learning workloads across the entire spectrum of AWS compute capabilities, including Amazon ECS, Amazon... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • can you run OS applications in lambda layers?
    As others mentioned, you *can*. It might be easier with AWS Batch (https://aws.amazon.com/batch/) depending on what you're trying to do. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Google Cloud Run mentions (89)

  • Comparing Prices: AWS Fargate vs Azure Container Apps vs Google Cloud Run
    AWS Fargate, Google Cloud Run and Azure Container Apps offer services to deploy containers serverless in the cloud. The three providers are the biggest in the industry, but how do their prices compare? One thing all 3 providers have in common: Their pricing is pretty complicated and it can be hard to keep the overview. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Google Cloud Run vs Sliplane - Comparison of two container hosting services
    Google Cloud Run (GCR) and Sliplane both simplify deployment, management, and scaling of containerized applications. However, there are some key differences, and both platforms serve different users and use cases. Let's compare them side by side. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Why aren't we all serverless yet?
    >Something I’m still having trouble believing is that complex workflows are going to move to e.g. AWS Lambda rather than stateless containers orchestrated by e.g. Amazon EKS. I think 0-1 it makes sense, but operating/scaling efficiently seems hard. […] This isn't really saying anything about serverless though. The issue here is not with serverless but that Lambda wants you to break up your server into multiple... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Top 8 Docker Alternatives to Consider in 2025
    Google Cloud Run offers a serverless platform for running containers, providing automatic scaling and management of containerized applications. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Day 3: What is Docker and why should I care?
    Most cloud platforms support Docker containers. Sliplane, Fly.io, AWS, Google Cloud, etc. This means that you can easily switch between cloud providers if you want to, without having to change your software. If you ever migrated from one cloud provider to another, you probably know how much work this can be. With Docker, you can just take your container image and run it on the new platform. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AWS Batch and Google Cloud Run, you can also consider the following products

Fission.io - Fission.io is a serverless framework for Kubernetes that supports many concepts such as event triggers, parallel execution, and statelessness.

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service

Nuclio - Nuclio is an open source serverless platform.

Spot.io - Build web, mobile and IoT applications using AWS Lambda and API Gateway, Azure Functions, Google Cloud Functions, and more.

APeX - Get your own corner of the Web for less! Register a new .COM for just $9.99 for the first year and get everything you need to make your mark online — website builder, hosting, email, and more.

Knative - Knative provides a set of components for building modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere.