Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

gocryptfs VS Cryptomator

Compare gocryptfs VS Cryptomator and see what are their differences

gocryptfs logo gocryptfs

modernlized encfs by a maintainer of encfs

Cryptomator logo Cryptomator

When it comes to saving your files on a cloud server, it is important to ensure the security of those files. Keeping your delicate files out of the wrong hands can save you a lot of time and hassle. Read more about Cryptomator.
Not present
  • Cryptomator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-12

gocryptfs features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    GoCryptfs is designed to be user-friendly and easy to set up, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced users who need encrypted file systems.
  • Performance
    It offers good performance because it operates directly on a file-based level, efficiently handling encryption and decryption with minimal overhead.
  • FUSE-Based
    Being based on FUSE (Filesystem in Userspace), it allows users to mount encrypted file systems in user space without needing root permissions, which increases flexibility and security.
  • Filename Encryption
    GoCryptfs supports filename encryption to protect not just the file content but also metadata like file names, thereby enhancing privacy.
  • Open Source
    It is open source, allowing for community reviews and improvements, which ensures a transparent and secure software development process.

Possible disadvantages of gocryptfs

  • Platform Dependence
    Being a FUSE-based system, GoCryptfs primarily supports Unix-like systems, which could be limiting for Windows users without additional software installations.
  • Complexity for Large Setups
    While it handles individual file encryption well, managing large numbers of files or very large datasets could introduce complexity and potential performance degradation.
  • FUSE Overhead
    Despite its efficiency, FUSE can introduce some performance overhead compared to kernel-based file systems, which might not be ideal for performance-critical applications.
  • Dependency on FUSE
    The reliance on FUSE means that its functionality can be affected by the stability and security of the underlying FUSE implementation.

Cryptomator features and specs

  • Open Source
    Cryptomator is open source, meaning its source code is available for review and audit by the community, ensuring transparency and trustworthiness.
  • User-Friendly
    The application has an intuitive and easy-to-use interface, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical skill.
  • Encryption Standard
    Cryptomator uses AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) with 256-bit key length to secure your data, providing robust protection against unauthorized access.
  • Cross-Platform
    It supports multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android, allowing for seamless synchronization across devices.
  • No Account Required
    Users do not need to create an account to use Cryptomator, enhancing user privacy and data protection.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Cryptomator can integrate with various cloud storage solutions like Google Drive, Dropbox, and OneDrive, providing an extra layer of security for your cloud-stored files.

Possible disadvantages of Cryptomator

  • Performance Limitations
    Because files are encrypted and decrypted on-the-fly, the application may experience slower performance, especially for large files or folders.
  • Mobile App Cost
    While the desktop version is free, the mobile apps require a one-time purchase, which might deter some users.
  • No Native Cloud Backup
    Cryptomator itself does not offer native cloud backup services. Users must rely on third-party cloud providers for storing encrypted files.
  • No Live Collaboration Features
    The application does not support live collaboration on encrypted documents, limiting its utility for team-based projects.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Certain cloud providers may occasionally change their APIs or policies, potentially causing compatibility issues until updates are made.

Analysis of Cryptomator

Overall verdict

  • Cryptomator is a highly recommended tool for individuals seeking a secure and private method of encrypting files before uploading them to cloud storage. It strikes a balance between security and usability, making it appealing for both technical and non-technical users.

Why this product is good

  • Cryptomator is considered good because it provides client-side encryption, ensuring that only you have access to your files. It is open-source, which means its code is transparent and has been reviewed by the community, enhancing its security credibility. It's also user-friendly, allowing seamless integration with cloud storage providers and offering a zero-knowledge architecture, which means even their developers cannot access your data.

Recommended for

  • Individuals concerned about privacy and security of their data in the cloud.
  • Users looking for an open-source, community-reviewed encryption tool.
  • People who need a user-friendly encryption solution that works with various cloud storage services.
  • Those who prefer a service with a zero-knowledge policy, ensuring complete data confidentiality.

gocryptfs videos

No gocryptfs videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Cryptomator videos

Cryptomator Tutorial: Get Started

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Easily Encrypt Anything - Cryptomator The Best FREE Encryption Software! (multiplatform)
  • Review - Cryptomator and Nextcloud

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to gocryptfs and Cryptomator)
Security & Privacy
13 13%
87% 87
Cloud Storage
2 2%
98% 98
File Encryption
100 100%
0% 0
File Sharing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using gocryptfs and Cryptomator. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare gocryptfs and Cryptomator

gocryptfs Reviews

5 Best TrueCrypt Alternatives - Open source encryption apps
gocryptfs is command line only, but the setup is very easy. Once set up, you can drag-and-drop files to and from the private folder using your regular GUI file manager. Alternatively, SiriKali is a GUI frontend compatible with gocryptfs.
Source: proprivacy.com

Cryptomator Reviews

6 TrueCrypt Alternatives for Reliable Data Encryption
Cryptomator is a great free encryption software tool for users looking to encrypt individual files rather than a large volume of data as seen with TrueCrypt or other alternatives mentioned here. This makes sense if you update only a few files regularly and the rest of your files remain relatively unchanged. Cryptomator is supported on Windows, Mac, and Linux operating...
15 Best Rclone Alternatives 2022
With Cryptomator, what you get is a simple digital protection tool. Rclone syncs your files to cloud storage, while Cryptomator syncs and locks your files to cloud storage. Cryptomator gives you access to your files on any device and only you hold the keys to access them.
5 Best TrueCrypt Alternatives - Open source encryption apps
Cryptomator for the desktop works on a pay what you want model. It can be had for free, but users are encouraged to donate towards its development. The mobile apps (which support fingerprint unlock) cost $8.99 at time of writing.
Source: proprivacy.com
16 Tresorit Alternatives
Cryptomator will be giving you the full permission in which you can choose to encrypt the whole of your data on your series of workstations or top of any cloud devices or any storage media. It will be working all through the creation of the virtual device right through which the encrypted content can be readily displayed.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cryptomator seems to be a lot more popular than gocryptfs. While we know about 298 links to Cryptomator, we've tracked only 14 mentions of gocryptfs. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

gocryptfs mentions (14)

  • Syncthing: Untrusted Device Encryption
    I'm looking to improve my documents syncing setup. Currently I'm using owncloud, but that seems overkill for just files syncing and it requires maintenance, so I gave Syncthing a look. The "Untrusted device encryption" was not appealing to me because I'm not convinced by the security aspects yet, and also because it is in beta for now. I used gocryptfs [1] in the past and was quite happy with it, so I'm planning... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Enigma: A simple cross-platform encrypted filesystem in Golang
    A comparison gocryptfs would be appreciated, since this software, at first glance, has no differentiating features from it. https://nuetzlich.net/gocryptfs/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Dropbox Buys Boxcryptor
    Gocryptfs is another option. https://nuetzlich.net/gocryptfs/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Why is VeraCrypt no longer supported by voidlinux?
    If you'd like something similar to Tomb but in userspace, perhaps you'd prefer gocryptfs? It's also in void repos. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Is there a way to password protect a folder?
    Not sure about your use case, but I personally use gocryptfs : https://nuetzlich.net/gocryptfs/. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Cryptomator mentions (298)

  • Owning my own data, part 1: Integrating a self-hosted calendar solution
    I know this is not what people want to hear, but your data will never be safer than it is in the cloud. No setup you can dream up at home with in a reasonable budget will ever come close to the resilience and redundancy you have in the cloud. Ownership is not about storing everything at home (or well, it's part of it), but having control over your data, which you can easily have while at the same time using the... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Apple pulls data protection tool after UK government security row
    It's a drag that we're seeing this crap happen, but authoritarians will be authoritarians. What's the general opinion of tools like Cryptomator? [^1] [^1]: https://cryptomator.org. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Cryptomator: end-to-end encrypt files in any cloud
    To prevent this from happening, you can use a tool like Cryptomator to automatically encrypt your files before uploading them to the cloud. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Dropbox: How to opt out of 3rd party AI partner access to your Dropbox
    The best way to do this is with https://cryptomator.org. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Is it private if I lock my pdf
    Before putting anything on a cloud service I would recommend 3rd party tools, like Cryptomator, to encrypt folders and such, then upload to a cloud service. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing gocryptfs and Cryptomator, you can also consider the following products

VeraCrypt - VeraCrypt is a free open source disk encryption software for Windows, Mac OSX and Linux.

CryFS - CryFS encrypts your files, so you can safely store them anywhere.

BoxCryptor - Boxcryptor encrypts your sensitive files before uploading them to cloud storage services like Dropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, Box, and many others.

EncFS - EncFS provides an encrypted filesystem in user-space.

Mega - Secure File Storage and collaboration

TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt is a leading cross-platform that provides encryption tools that allow you to migrate any encrypted data to virtual disks images on your systems.