Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GNU Make VS AWS CodeBuild

Compare GNU Make VS AWS CodeBuild and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

GNU Make logo GNU Make

GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

AWS CodeBuild logo AWS CodeBuild

Online shopping from the earth's biggest selection of books, magazines, music, DVDs, videos, electronics, computers, software, apparel & accessories, shoes, jewelry, tools & hardware, housewares, furniture, sporting goods, beauty & personal care, br…
  • GNU Make Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12
  • AWS CodeBuild Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-19

GNU Make features and specs

  • Portability
    GNU Make is highly portable and can be used across various Unix-like operating systems as well as on Windows.
  • Dependency Management
    It efficiently handles complex dependencies between various parts of the software, ensuring that changes are propagated properly.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source software, GNU Make is freely available and can be modified according to user needs.
  • Wide Adoption
    It is widely adopted in the industry, which means that there is extensive documentation and a large community for support.
  • Efficiency
    GNU Make speeds up the build process by only recompiling the necessary parts of the codebase.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Make

  • Complex Syntax
    The syntax of GNU Makefiles can become very complex, especially for large projects, making them hard to read and maintain.
  • Limited Cross-Platform Scripting
    While the tool itself is cross-platform, Makefiles can sometimes include shell commands that are not portable.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Beginners may find it challenging to grasp the concepts and syntax of GNU Make, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Debugging Difficulty
    Debugging Makefiles can be difficult, with limited tools available to trace or step through the make process.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    For extremely large projects, performance can become an issue, as the evaluation of dependencies might become slow.

AWS CodeBuild features and specs

  • Fully Managed
    AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service. Users do not need to worry about provisioning, managing, and scaling their own build servers.
  • Scalability
    CodeBuild automatically scales up and down to meet the demands of your build process, ensuring that builds are completed quickly without manual intervention.
  • Pay-as-You-Go Pricing
    Users only pay for the compute time they consume with CodeBuild, making it a cost-effective solution for many developer teams.
  • Integration with AWS Services
    CodeBuild integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like S3, EC2, and CloudWatch, providing a cohesive environment for your development and deployment pipelines.
  • Custom Environment Support
    Users can define their own build environments with custom Docker images, providing flexibility to meet specific build requirements.

Possible disadvantages of AWS CodeBuild

  • Complex Setup for Beginners
    Setting up projects in CodeBuild can be complex for users who are new to AWS or continuous integration services.
  • Limited Local Testing
    Unlike some CI tools, AWS CodeBuild provides limited options for running builds locally before pushing changes, which can hinder testing processes.
  • Learning Curve
    Users unfamiliar with AWS services may face a steep learning curve when first using CodeBuild as it involves understanding several AWS concepts and configurations.
  • Potential Costs at Scale
    While the pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective for small workloads, costs can accumulate significantly as usage scales up if not managed carefully.
  • Configuration Management
    Managing build spec files and environment configurations can become complex, especially in projects with many different build processes.

GNU Make videos

No GNU Make videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

AWS CodeBuild videos

AWS CodeBuild Tutorial

More videos:

  • Review - AWS CodeBuild Overview
  • Review - All the AWS CodeBuild You Can Stomach in 45 Minutes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Make and AWS CodeBuild)
Front End Package Manager
Continuous Integration
0 0%
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Make and AWS CodeBuild. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AWS CodeBuild seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU Make mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Make yet. Tracking of GNU Make recommendations started around Mar 2021.

AWS CodeBuild mentions (13)

  • Low Cost "Overkill" AWS Infrastructure for a Newborn Startup
    Therefore, I used AWS Codebuild and AWS CodePipeline to automate the steps of building and deploying the services. The diagram below depicts all the steps required to continuously deliver the frontend and backend applications:. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • How CodeCatalyst compares to other AWS Services related to Development and CI/CD processes
    We treat these services in one  group as they belong together from a strategic point of view. They have been around for a few years and the teams that built these are now involved in CodeCatalyst. CodeCatalyst partly uses them “under the hood”. CodeCommit is a managed git hosting, CodeBuild is a managed “build” system, CodeStar is a “project management” tool. CodePipeline allows combining multiple CodeBuild steps... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Well-Architected Review - Part II - Operational Excellence
    Design for Operations You should implement your entire workload as code. The benefit is that you can apply the same engineering discipline that you use for application code to your infrastructure. Use version control system like AWS Codecommit to enable tracking of changes and releases, and use AWS Cloudformation for your infrastructure templates. It is recommendable to test and validate changes to help limit... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • DevSecOps with AWS - Multi Environment deployments - Part 2
    AWS CodeBuild: fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • DEVOPS AS A SERVICE
    AWS CodeBuild is a completely managed service for compiling code, testing quality assurance using automated procedures, and generating software ready for deployment. CodeBuild is incredibly secure, as each client receives a unique set of encryption keys to include in each created artifact. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Make and AWS CodeBuild, you can also consider the following products

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

AWS CodePipeline - Continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application updates

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.