Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

AWS CodePipeline VS GNU Make

Compare AWS CodePipeline VS GNU Make and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

AWS CodePipeline logo AWS CodePipeline

Continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application updates

GNU Make logo GNU Make

GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.
  • AWS CodePipeline Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-25
  • GNU Make Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12

AWS CodePipeline features and specs

  • Integration with AWS Services
    AWS CodePipeline seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like CodeCommit, CodeBuild, and CodeDeploy, enabling a smooth and coordinated CI/CD process.
  • Scalability
    AWS CodePipeline automatically scales with your development workflows, offering the scalability needed to handle varying workloads without manual intervention.
  • Automated Workflow
    CodePipeline allows for the creation of automated, repeatable workflows for building, testing, and deploying code, which reduces human error and increases efficiency.
  • Pay-As-You-Go Pricing
    The pricing model is pay-as-you-go, so you only pay for what you use, making it cost-effective for businesses of all sizes.
  • Built-In Security
    AWS CodePipeline offers built-in security features such as AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles, ensuring that your CI/CD process adheres to best security practices.

Possible disadvantages of AWS CodePipeline

  • Learning Curve
    For those who are not familiar with AWS services, there can be a considerable learning curve to effectively utilize AWS CodePipeline.
  • Limited Customization
    While the service covers many use cases, it may offer limited customization options for highly specific or complex CI/CD workflows compared to other third-party tools.
  • Service Dependency
    Heavily relying on AWS CodePipeline ties your deployment pipeline to AWS, which can be limiting if you plan to use multi-cloud environments.
  • Latency Issues
    Latency can occur when connecting with external repositories or third-party tools, impacting the speed of the deployment pipeline.
  • Costs for High Usage
    While the pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective for many use cases, high-frequency usage can lead to significant costs over time, especially for large-scale enterprises.

GNU Make features and specs

  • Portability
    GNU Make is highly portable and can be used across various Unix-like operating systems as well as on Windows.
  • Dependency Management
    It efficiently handles complex dependencies between various parts of the software, ensuring that changes are propagated properly.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source software, GNU Make is freely available and can be modified according to user needs.
  • Wide Adoption
    It is widely adopted in the industry, which means that there is extensive documentation and a large community for support.
  • Efficiency
    GNU Make speeds up the build process by only recompiling the necessary parts of the codebase.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Make

  • Complex Syntax
    The syntax of GNU Makefiles can become very complex, especially for large projects, making them hard to read and maintain.
  • Limited Cross-Platform Scripting
    While the tool itself is cross-platform, Makefiles can sometimes include shell commands that are not portable.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Beginners may find it challenging to grasp the concepts and syntax of GNU Make, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Debugging Difficulty
    Debugging Makefiles can be difficult, with limited tools available to trace or step through the make process.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    For extremely large projects, performance can become an issue, as the evaluation of dependencies might become slow.

AWS CodePipeline videos

AWS CodePipeline tutorial | Build a CI/CD Pipeline on AWS

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to AWS CodePipeline - Continuous Delivery on Amazon Web Services
  • Review - AWS CodePipeline | AWS CodeDeploy | AWS CodeBuild | CodeCommit | Deploy WebApp a Hands on Lab
  • Review - Streamline Your Software Release Process Using AWS CodePipeline

GNU Make videos

No GNU Make videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to AWS CodePipeline and GNU Make)
Continuous Integration
100 100%
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
DevOps Tools
100 100%
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using AWS CodePipeline and GNU Make. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare AWS CodePipeline and GNU Make

AWS CodePipeline Reviews

The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
AWS CodePipeline is a continuous integration and continuous delivery service that easily and quickly automates your release pipelines for updates. Every time you change the code, AWS CodePipeline will build, test, and deploy your application. Also, it can be easily integrated with GitHub.

GNU Make Reviews

We have no reviews of GNU Make yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AWS CodePipeline seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 29 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

AWS CodePipeline mentions (29)

View more

GNU Make mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Make yet. Tracking of GNU Make recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing AWS CodePipeline and GNU Make, you can also consider the following products

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.