Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

SBT VS AWS CodeBuild

Compare SBT VS AWS CodeBuild and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

SBT logo SBT

SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

AWS CodeBuild logo AWS CodeBuild

Online shopping from the earth's biggest selection of books, magazines, music, DVDs, videos, electronics, computers, software, apparel & accessories, shoes, jewelry, tools & hardware, housewares, furniture, sporting goods, beauty & personal care, br…
  • SBT Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02
  • AWS CodeBuild Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-19

SBT features and specs

  • Incremental Compilation
    SBT offers incremental compilation, which only recompiles the parts of your code that have changed, leading to faster build times and increased productivity.
  • Interactive Shell
    SBT provides an interactive shell that allows developers to run tasks, tests, and compile code without leaving the environment, improving the workflow and convenience.
  • Built-In Dependency Management
    SBT integrates seamlessly with Ivy for dependency management, making it easy to define, manage, and retrieve project dependencies efficiently.
  • Scala-Specific
    SBT is specifically designed for Scala projects, offering tailored features and optimizations that align well with Scala programming paradigms and best practices.
  • Highly Customizable
    With a powerful plugin ecosystem and the ability to define custom tasks, SBT is highly customizable, allowing developers to tailor the build process to their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages of SBT

  • Complexity
    SBT can be difficult to learn for new Scala developers due to its unique syntax and extensive configuration options, potentially leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Performance Overheads
    While SBT provides incremental compilation, it may still have performance overheads in large projects or when many plugins are used, affecting build times.
  • Limited Ecosystem Outside Scala
    Since SBT is specifically tailored for Scala, its ecosystem and community support may be more limited for projects that involve languages other than Scala.
  • Less Popular Than Some Alternatives
    Compared to build tools like Maven or Gradle, SBT has a smaller user base, which can result in fewer resources, forums, and community support for troubleshooting.
  • Debugging Difficulty
    The configuration language of SBT may be challenging to debug, particularly for users unfamiliar with its syntax, leading to potential difficulties in resolving issues.

AWS CodeBuild features and specs

  • Fully Managed
    AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed continuous integration service. Users do not need to worry about provisioning, managing, and scaling their own build servers.
  • Scalability
    CodeBuild automatically scales up and down to meet the demands of your build process, ensuring that builds are completed quickly without manual intervention.
  • Pay-as-You-Go Pricing
    Users only pay for the compute time they consume with CodeBuild, making it a cost-effective solution for many developer teams.
  • Integration with AWS Services
    CodeBuild integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like S3, EC2, and CloudWatch, providing a cohesive environment for your development and deployment pipelines.
  • Custom Environment Support
    Users can define their own build environments with custom Docker images, providing flexibility to meet specific build requirements.

Possible disadvantages of AWS CodeBuild

  • Complex Setup for Beginners
    Setting up projects in CodeBuild can be complex for users who are new to AWS or continuous integration services.
  • Limited Local Testing
    Unlike some CI tools, AWS CodeBuild provides limited options for running builds locally before pushing changes, which can hinder testing processes.
  • Learning Curve
    Users unfamiliar with AWS services may face a steep learning curve when first using CodeBuild as it involves understanding several AWS concepts and configurations.
  • Potential Costs at Scale
    While the pay-as-you-go model is cost-effective for small workloads, costs can accumulate significantly as usage scales up if not managed carefully.
  • Configuration Management
    Managing build spec files and environment configurations can become complex, especially in projects with many different build processes.

SBT videos

+ Add

Inside PWC Engine Remanufacturer SBT

More videos:

  • Review - review audio sound system milik youtuber ibnu sbt trenggalek horregg luuurrrrrr
  • Review - CEK SOUND & REVIEW SOUND OMAHAN YOUTUBER IBNU SBT TRENGGALEK

AWS CodeBuild videos

+ Add

AWS CodeBuild Tutorial

More videos:

  • Review - AWS CodeBuild Overview
  • Review - All the AWS CodeBuild You Can Stomach in 45 Minutes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SBT and AWS CodeBuild)

SBT

AWS CodeBuild

JS Build Tools
100 100%
JS Build Tools
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
Continuous Integration
100% 100
Front End Package Manager
100 100%
Front End Package Manager
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using SBT and AWS CodeBuild. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AWS CodeBuild seems to be a lot more popular than SBT. While we know about 13 links to AWS CodeBuild, we've tracked only 1 mention of SBT. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SBT mentions (1)

  • Declarative Gradle is a cool thing I am afraid of: Maven strikes back
    NOTE: I won’t mention SBT and Leiningen here because, with all due respect, they are niche build tools. I also won’t discuss Kobalt for the same reason (besides, it’s no longer actively maintained). Additionally, I won’t touch upon Bazel and Buck in this context, mainly because I’m not very familiar with them. If you have insights or comments about these tools, please feel free to share them in the comments 👇. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

AWS CodeBuild mentions (13)

  • Low Cost "Overkill" AWS Infrastructure for a Newborn Startup
    Therefore, I used AWS Codebuild and AWS CodePipeline to automate the steps of building and deploying the services. The diagram below depicts all the steps required to continuously deliver the frontend and backend applications:. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • How CodeCatalyst compares to other AWS Services related to Development and CI/CD processes
    We treat these services in one  group as they belong together from a strategic point of view. They have been around for a few years and the teams that built these are now involved in CodeCatalyst. CodeCatalyst partly uses them “under the hood”. CodeCommit is a managed git hosting, CodeBuild is a managed “build” system, CodeStar is a “project management” tool. CodePipeline allows combining multiple CodeBuild steps... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Well-Architected Review - Part II - Operational Excellence
    Design for Operations You should implement your entire workload as code. The benefit is that you can apply the same engineering discipline that you use for application code to your infrastructure. Use version control system like AWS Codecommit to enable tracking of changes and releases, and use AWS Cloudformation for your infrastructure templates. It is recommendable to test and validate changes to help limit... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • DevSecOps with AWS - Multi Environment deployments - Part 2
    AWS CodeBuild: fully managed continuous integration service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • DEVOPS AS A SERVICE
    AWS CodeBuild is a completely managed service for compiling code, testing quality assurance using automated procedures, and generating software ready for deployment. CodeBuild is incredibly secure, as each client receives a unique set of encryption keys to include in each created artifact. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SBT and AWS CodeBuild, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

AWS CodePipeline - Continuous delivery service for fast and reliable application updates

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Loading...