Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GNU Bourne Again SHell VS Bat

Compare GNU Bourne Again SHell VS Bat and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

GNU Bourne Again SHell logo GNU Bourne Again SHell

Bash is the shell, or command language interpreter, that will appear in the GNU operating system.

Bat logo Bat

A cat(1) clone with wings.
  • GNU Bourne Again SHell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-14
  • Bat Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19

GNU Bourne Again SHell features and specs

  • Compatibility
    Bash is highly compatible with sh, the original Bourne Shell, making it easy for users familiar with other Unix-like systems to adapt.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    Bash supports a wide range of scripting functionalities, including command substitution, variables, and control structures, making it powerful for complex scripting tasks.
  • Widespread Usage
    Bash is the default shell for many Linux distributions and macOS, ensuring widespread availability and community support.
  • Interactive Use
    Bash offers interactive features such as command line editing, history substitution, and tab completion, enhancing user productivity.
  • Strong Community and Resources
    There is a robust community around Bash, providing a wealth of resources including documentation, tutorials, and forums for support.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Bourne Again SHell

  • Performance Overhead
    When compared to newer shells like Zsh or Fish, Bash can have slower performance due to its older architecture and design.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Bash lacks some of the advanced features and improvements found in other modern shells, such as better autocomplete functionality and enhanced scripting syntax.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    The robust feature set of Bash can be overwhelming to new users, especially those unfamiliar with command-line interfaces.
  • Error Handling
    Bash scripts can be prone to errors if not carefully handled, as it has limited debugging facilities compared to languages specifically designed for scripting.

Bat features and specs

  • Syntax Highlighting
    Bat provides syntax highlighting using the same syntax definitions as Sublime Text, which makes it easier to read code and configuration files compared to plain `cat`.
  • Git Integration
    Displays Git modifications alongside code, showing added, removed, and changed lines, which helps in tracking changes directly within the file contents.
  • Line Numbering
    Automatically includes line numbers in the output, which can be very useful for referencing specific lines without additional commands or tools.
  • Paging Support
    Integrates with paging utilities like `less` by default, allowing users to scroll through large files smoothly.
  • Compatibility
    Designed to be a drop-in replacement for `cat`, meaning it can be used in scripts and interactively without significant changes.
  • File Concatenation
    Like `cat`, Bat can concatenate files, streaming their content in a readable format with added enhancements.

Possible disadvantages of Bat

  • Installation Requirement
    Unlike `cat`, which is pre-installed on most Unix systems, Bat may require manual installation, adding an extra step before use.
  • Performance Impact
    The additional features like syntax highlighting and Git integration may cause a slight delay compared to the instantaneous output of `cat`, especially for very large files.
  • Dependency on External Tools
    Relies on other tools, like `less`, for full functionality, which may not be available in minimal environments.
  • Complexity for Simple Tasks
    For users who need to quickly view file contents without any enhancements, Bat's additional features may be overkill.
  • Resource Usage
    Consumes more system resources like memory and CPU compared to `cat`, particularly noticeable when dealing with very large files or using extensive syntax highlighting.

GNU Bourne Again SHell videos

No GNU Bourne Again SHell videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Bat videos

$30 WOOD BAT vs $150 WOOD BAT - Louisville Slugger Wood Bat Reviews - Bat Bros in VEGAS

More videos:

  • Review - Hitting with the 2021 DEMARINI THE GOODS 2-Piece - BBCOR Baseball Bat Reviews
  • Review - Hitting with the MARUCCI CAT9 & CAT9 CONNECT - BBCOR Baseball Bat Reviews

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GNU Bourne Again SHell and Bat)
Cryptocurrencies
100 100%
0% 0
Note Taking
0 0%
100% 100
Blockchain
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using GNU Bourne Again SHell and Bat. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Bat seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 110 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GNU Bourne Again SHell mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of GNU Bourne Again SHell yet. Tracking of GNU Bourne Again SHell recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Bat mentions (110)

  • Man pages are great, man readers are the problem
    I page man (and many other things) through bat[0] which improves my experience. [0]: https://github.com/sharkdp/bat. - Source: Hacker News / 27 days ago
  • What to do when your git worktree is not detecting file changes
    My cat replacement (bat), shows the changed lines. - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago
  • Rewriting essential Linux packages in Rust
    I also really like: https://github.com/eza-community/eza (modern ls replacement) https://github.com/BurntSushi/erd (modern tree replacement) https://github.com/sharkdp/bat (modern cat(1) replacement) my .zshrc for every system now uses these as drop in replacements. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Wombat - Syntax Highlighting with Rust's Bat Called from Crystal
    Have you heard of the command-line tool bat, written in Rust? Bat is a command-line tool similar to cat that displays file contents in the terminal, but with additional features like line numbering, syntax highlighting, and paging. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Hyperfine: A command-line benchmarking tool
    Perhaps interesting (for some) to note that hyperfine is from the same author as at least a few other "ne{w,xt} generation" command line tools (that could maybe be seen as part of "rewrite it in Rust", but I don't want to paint the author with a brush they disagree with!!): fd (find alternative; https://github.com/sharkdp/fd), and hexyl (hex viewer; - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GNU Bourne Again SHell and Bat, you can also consider the following products

fish shell - The friendly interactive shell.

fd - A simple, fast and user-friendly alternative to 'find'.

zsh - The Z shell (Zsh) is a Unix shell that can be used as an interactive login shell and as a powerful command interpreter for shell scripting.

fzf - A command-line fuzzy finder written in Go

PowerShell Plus - Learn how to learn and master PowerShell fast with an interactive learning center, a powerful IDE, pre-loaded scripts, and a PowerShell Editor… all for free.

Starship (Shell Prompt) - Starship is the minimal, blazing fast, and extremely customizable prompt for any shell! Shows the information you need, while staying sleek and minimal. Quick installation available for Bash, Fish, ZSH, Ion, and Powershell.