Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

GitHub Copilot VS EnTT

Compare GitHub Copilot VS EnTT and see what are their differences

GitHub Copilot logo GitHub Copilot

Your AI pair programmer. With GitHub Copilot, get suggestions for whole lines or entire functions right inside your editor.

EnTT logo EnTT

Header-only C++ game development library with innovative ECS (Entity-Component-System).
  • GitHub Copilot Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

Trained on billions of lines of public code, GitHub Copilot puts the knowledge you need at your fingertips, saving you time and helping you stay focused.

  • EnTT Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-05

GitHub Copilot features and specs

  • Productivity Boost
    GitHub Copilot helps developers write code faster by providing intelligent suggestions and automating repetitive tasks. This can save significant time and reduce the cognitive load on developers.
  • Learning Tool
    For less experienced developers, Copilot can serve as a learning tool by suggesting best practices and introducing them to new coding patterns and techniques.
  • Support for Multiple Languages
    Copilot supports a wide range of programming languages, making it a versatile tool for developers working in different tech stacks.
  • Context-Aware Suggestions
    Copilot offers context-aware suggestions based on the code that has been written so far, making its recommendations relevant to the current development task.
  • Integration with GitHub
    Seamless integration with GitHub simplifies the development workflow, enabling smoother transitions from coding to version control and collaboration.

Possible disadvantages of GitHub Copilot

  • Code Quality Concerns
    The quality of the code generated by Copilot may vary, and it might introduce suboptimal code or practices that could lead to maintenance challenges.
  • Security Risks
    Copilot might suggest insecure code patterns or snippets, potentially introducing vulnerabilities into the project if not carefully reviewed by the developer.
  • Dependence on AI
    Over-reliance on Copilot's suggestions can lead to a lack of deep understanding of the code, which may hinder a developer's growth and problem-solving skills.
  • Licensing and Code Reuse Issues
    There are concerns about the legality and ethics of using AI-generated code snippets that might be derived from copyrighted sources, which can lead to licensing issues.
  • Limited Customizability
    Copilot may not always align with specific coding standards or preferences of a development team, and the ability to customize its behavior to enforce such standards is limited.

EnTT features and specs

  • Performance
    EnTT is known for its high performance and minimal overhead, making it suitable for real-time applications such as games.
  • Flexibility
    EnTT provides a flexible ECS (Entity-Component-System) framework that allows developers to customize systems and components as needed.
  • Header-only
    As a header-only library, EnTT is easy to integrate into projects with minimal setup.
  • Modern C++
    EnTT takes full advantage of modern C++ features, offering a concise and efficient API.
  • Active Community
    EnTT has an active community and detailed documentation, which can help developers troubleshoot and optimize their use of the library.

Possible disadvantages of EnTT

  • Complexity
    The complexity of EnTT and ECS in general can be daunting for beginners who are not familiar with these concepts.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its flexibility and use of modern C++ techniques, there is a steep learning curve associated with mastering EnTT.
  • Limited Use Cases
    While EnTT excels in game development, its ECS paradigm might not be the best fit for all types of applications, such as traditional object-oriented systems.
  • C++ Specific
    As a C++ library, EnTT is not suitable for projects or teams using other programming languages, limiting its usability to C++ ecosystems.

Analysis of GitHub Copilot

Overall verdict

  • Overall, GitHub Copilot is a beneficial tool for many developers, especially those looking to increase their productivity and experiment with new coding styles. It can be seen as an intelligent coding assistant that complements a developer's workflow rather than replaces it.

Why this product is good

  • GitHub Copilot is considered good by many because it provides AI-assisted code completion and suggestions, which can significantly speed up coding tasks and improve productivity. It leverages OpenAI's advanced language models to offer context-aware snippets and solutions that can help developers write code more efficiently, reduce errors, and explore new coding approaches.

Recommended for

  • Software developers seeking to increase productivity
  • Beginner programmers looking for contextual code suggestions
  • Experienced developers interested in exploring and discovering alternative coding solutions
  • Teams aiming to standardize code quality and reduce time spent on routine coding tasks

GitHub Copilot videos

Game over… GitHub Copilot X announced

More videos:

  • Review - The New GitHub Copilot X Powered by GPT-4 is Here!
  • Review - GitHub Copilot X -- AI Programming Gets Better... and Scary.
  • Review - GitHub Copilot Review 2023: I Love It, But It's Not For Everyone
  • Review - Is Github Copilot Worth Paying For??

EnTT videos

EnTT -- C++ ECS Gaming Library

More videos:

  • Review - Intro to EnTT (ECS) | Game Engine series

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to GitHub Copilot and EnTT)
Developer Tools
97 97%
3% 3
Programming
0 0%
100% 100
AI
100 100%
0% 0
Coding
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using GitHub Copilot and EnTT. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare GitHub Copilot and EnTT

GitHub Copilot Reviews

  1. Stan
    · Founder at SaaSHub ·
    Indispensable

    It definitely increases my productivity.

    🏁 Competitors: Tabnine

Cursor vs Windsurf vs GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot Chat is similar — you can ask it to explain code or suggest improvements. It's integrated right into VS Code, so it feels pretty seamless. They've been rolling out some new features lately, like better chat history, drag and & folders and ways to attach more context. But if you're already using Cursor, you might not find anything groundbreaking here.
Source: www.builder.io
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot Chat is similar — you can ask it to explain code or suggest improvements. It's integrated right into VS Code, so it feels pretty seamless. They've been rolling out some new features lately, like better chat history, drag and & folders and ways to attach more context. But if you're already using Cursor, you might not find anything groundbreaking here.
Source: www.builder.io
Top 10 Vercel v0 Open Source Alternatives | Medium
Next up, we have GitHub Copilot, a popular AI-powered code completion tool that’s been making waves in the developer community. Built on top of OpenAI Codex, Copilot integrates seamlessly with various code editors and IDEs to provide intelligent code suggestions as you type.
Source: medium.com
10 Best Github Copilot Alternatives in 2024
GitHub Copilot is an excellent tool for developers, allowing them to boost their workflow and project quality. Are you looking for a GitHub Copilot alternative that fits your needs in 2024? Whether you’re searching for a free GitHub Copilot alternative, an open-source alternative to GitHub Copilot, or a tool that works well with VSCode, this guide is here to help.
The Best GitHub Copilot Alternatives for Developers
Moreover, GitHub Copilot provides a wide range of functionalities, such as code explanation, answering coding questions, refactoring code, and generation of unit tests and docs. With it, developers can automate coding tasks, improve productivity and focus more on complex coding. GitHub Copilot supports various programming languages, including JavaScript, Python, Ruby, Go,...
Source: softteco.com

EnTT Reviews

We have no reviews of EnTT yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GitHub Copilot should be more popular than EnTT. It has been mentiond 297 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

GitHub Copilot mentions (297)

  • My Experience at Commit Conf 2025
    AI is replacing traditional platforms like Stack Overflow, Reddit, and Google Search for developers — tools like GitHub Copilot, Cursor.ai, and Windsurf are seen as faster, more tailored, and more efficient. - Source: dev.to / about 21 hours ago
  • Getting the Best Out of GitHub Copilot
    As my first in-editor AI coding partner, I started with Cursor. However, four months ago, I decided to switch to GitHub Copilot. While using Cursor, I was aware of Copilot and its features, but at the time, it felt unstable and not as polished as Cursor. Recently, I noticed that GitHub Copilot has been improving significantly, becoming a strong competitor to Cursor. This encouraged me to give Copilot a try,... - Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
  • I've tried all (46 😵‍💫) AI Coding Agents & IDEs
    GitHub Copilot The OG of this game, started back in 2020. Can generate code. Handles large codebases. Can merge PRs, fix bugs, search code. Supports agent mode now and also it's open-sourced. - Source: dev.to / 7 days ago
  • GitHub Copilot: AI-Powered Development with Intelligent Code Assistance
    GitHub Copilot transforms the developer experience with AI-powered code completions, chat assistance, and intelligent code reviews. Backed by advanced AI models including Claude, GPT, and Gemini, Copilot provides contextualized assistance throughout the software development lifecycle. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
  • Semantic Code Search
    We at Ducky.ai noticed a strange thing has happened in software development, we’re no longer writing code in the traditional sense. Instead, we describe what we want and ask the machine to write the first draft. Tools like GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Replit, and Devin have changed what it means to build. The keyboard isn’t gone, but it’s quieter. Developers are prompting, guiding, reviewing. Code appears in response... - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
View more

EnTT mentions (32)

  • Using Jolt with flecs & Dear ImGui: Game Physics Introspection
    EnTT is a popular alternative to flecs for C++, which has different performance/memory characteristics. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Focus: A simple and fast text editor written in Jai
    Https://pastebin.com/VPypiitk This is a very small experiment I did to learn the metaprogramming features. Its an ECS library using the same model as entt (https://github.com/skypjack/entt). In 200 lines or so it does the equivalent of a few thousand lines of template heavy Cpp while compiling instantly and generating good debug code. Some walkthrough: Line 8 declares... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Introducing Ecsact
    Since we wanted a common game simulation that would be on both the server and the client we looked into a few libraries that would fit our ECS needs. It was decided we were going to write this common part of our game in C++, but rust was considered. C++ was a familiar language for us so naturally EnTT and flecs came up right away. I had used EnTT before, writing some small demo projects, so our choice was made... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Sharing Saturday #472
    Are you sure you don't want to use a C++ package manager? Libtcod is on Vcpkg and with that setup you could add the fmt library or EnTT. Fmt fixes C++'s string handling and EnTT fixes everything wrong with the entities of the previous tutorials. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • What are the limits of blueprints?
    There's also a performance question. While we can now use Blueprint nativization to convert Blueprints to C++ the result will be a fairly naive version, fast enough for most purposes but not if you're trying to push every bit of performance. This is where you're looking at making sure you're hitting things such as using the CPU cache as well as possible for an ECS system (Look at ENTT or Flecs if you want to see... Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing GitHub Copilot and EnTT, you can also consider the following products

Codeium - Free AI-powered code completion for *everyone*, *everywhere*

Flecs - Multi-threaded Entity Component System written for C89 & C99

Tabnine - TabNine is the all-language autocompleter. We use deep learning to help you write code faster.

EntityX - Fast, type-safe C++ ECS (Entity-Component System).

Cursor - The AI-first Code Editor. Build software faster in an editor designed for pair-programming with AI.

Entitas - Entity Component System Framework for C# and Unity