Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Git Flow VS Commit Together by Github

Compare Git Flow VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

Hive
Seamless project management and collaboration for your team. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Git Flow logo Git Flow

Git Flow is a very self-explanatory free software workflow for managing Git branches.

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits
  • Git Flow Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-04
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04

Git Flow features and specs

  • Structured Release Model
    Git Flow provides a well-defined structure with dedicated branches for development, feature work, releases, and hotfixes, which can help teams manage and track their work more effectively.
  • Parallel Development
    It supports parallel development by allowing multiple feature branches to be worked on simultaneously without interfering with each other.
  • Stable Releases
    The release branch allows for thorough testing and stabilization before a release, helping ensure that issues are minimized in production.
  • Isolated Environments
    By using long-lived branches like develop and master, it allows for clean separation of completed and in-progress work.

Possible disadvantages of Git Flow

  • Complexity
    The workflow can become quite complex, especially for small teams or projects, requiring discipline in branch management and merging.
  • Overhead
    Maintaining multiple long-lived branches and frequent merges can introduce significant overhead, particularly in less automated environments.
  • Not Ideal for Continuous Delivery
    Git Flow may not be the best fit for continuous delivery environments, as its focus on release branches could slow down the process of deploying small, frequent updates.
  • Delayed Integration
    Feature branches can stay open for extended periods, leading to larger, riskier merges into the develop branch if integration isn’t done regularly.

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Git Flow videos

+ Add

Git Flow Is A Bad Idea

Commit Together by Github videos

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Git Flow and Commit Together by Github)

Git Flow

Commit Together by Github

Git
100 100%
Git
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
Productivity
100% 100
Code Collaboration
100 100%
Code Collaboration
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Git Flow and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Commit Together by Github seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Git Flow mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Git Flow yet. Tracking of Git Flow recommendations started around Apr 2022.

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Git Flow and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products

Working Copy - The powerful Git client for iOS

Commit Print - Posters of your git history

CodeHub - CodeHub is the most complete, unofficial, client for GitHub on the iOS platform.

GitHub for Atom - Git and GitHub integration right inside Atom

Diff So Fancy - Make Git diffs look good

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

Loading...