Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

FreedomBox VS SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem

Compare FreedomBox VS SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

FreedomBox logo FreedomBox

FreedomBox is a personal server running a free software operating system, with free applications designed to create and preserve personal privacy.

SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem logo SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem

Installation instructions for the Windows Subsystem for Linux on Windows 10.
  • FreedomBox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-24
  • SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-26

FreedomBox features and specs

  • Privacy Protection
    FreedomBox is designed to protect user privacy by enabling individuals to host their own services and data, reducing reliance on third-party platforms that may exploit personal information.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, FreedomBox offers transparency, allowing users to inspect the code and contribute to its development, fostering a community-driven ecosystem.
  • User-Friendly
    The platform aims to be user-friendly for those without technical expertise, providing a simple interface for managing services and configurations.
  • Cost-Effective
    FreedomBox can be run on affordable hardware, such as single-board computers, making it a cost-effective solution for personal server hosting.
  • Modular Design
    The system supports a modular design with a variety of pre-packaged applications that users can install as needed, offering flexibility and customization.

Possible disadvantages of FreedomBox

  • Limited Application Ecosystem
    Compared to larger platforms, the range of available applications and services that can be run on FreedomBox is limited, which may not fulfill all user needs.
  • Technical Challenges
    While aimed at non-experts, some users may still find the initial setup and configuration of FreedomBox challenging without technical support or prior knowledge.
  • Hardware Compatibility
    FreedomBox may not be compatible with every hardware configuration, requiring users to ensure their devices meet specific requirements or purchase new hardware.
  • Performance Limitations
    Running multiple services on minimal hardware might lead to performance limitations, impacting the speed and responsiveness of hosted applications.
  • Community Support
    Support primarily comes from community forums, which may not always provide timely solutions compared to professional customer support options.

SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem features and specs

  • Native Integration
    WSL provides a seamless native integration of Linux environments within Windows, allowing users to run Linux tools directly from the Windows command line without the overhead of a virtual machine.
  • Resource Efficiency
    WSL is more resource-efficient compared to running a full Linux virtual machine, as it does not require dedicated RAM or CPU allocation, making it ideal for development tasks.
  • Access to Linux Tools
    Users can access a vast array of Linux tools and utilities, including SSH, directly from their Windows machines, which can be valuable for development, scripting, and system administration.
  • Improved Workflow
    Developers can streamline their workflows by working within a unified environment, leveraging both Windows and Linux tools without switching contexts or setting up separate environments.
  • Fast Operations
    Operations such as file access and command execution in WSL are faster than using a virtual machine, due to the tighter integration with the Windows kernel.
  • Ease of Use
    WSL is easy to set up and use, with straightforward installation and configuration processes that simplify the adoption of Linux tools on Windows.

Possible disadvantages of SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem

  • Compatibility Issues
    Not all Linux applications are fully compatible with WSL, which can cause certain programs to fail or behave unpredictably compared to a native Linux environment.
  • Performance Overhead
    Despite being more efficient than a virtual machine, WSL can still introduce some performance overhead, especially for I/O-intensive applications.
  • Limited Kernel Support
    WSL does not support every aspect of the Linux kernel, which can limit functionalities, particularly for tasks that require deep kernel integration or specific kernel modules.
  • Network Configuration
    Network configurations can be tricky, especially when setting up complex networking scenarios like port forwarding or using certain networking tools that rely on Linux-based network stacks.
  • Security Considerations
    There are potential security implications of running Linux with root privileges under a Windows environment, which might not be suitable for all use cases, particularly in sensitive or high-security contexts.
  • Lack of Full GUI Support
    WSL is primarily command-line oriented, and while there are ways to run graphical applications, it does not offer full native GUI support, which can be a limitation for users needing a complete graphical Linux desktop experience.

FreedomBox videos

The Story of FreedomBox (2019)

More videos:

  • Review - FreedomBox, liberty inside the cloud. Run your own life. Host your freedom. Connect with people.
  • Review - Running your FreedomBox over Tor

SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem videos

No SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FreedomBox and SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem)
Control Panels
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Cryptocurrencies
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using FreedomBox and SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem should be more popular than FreedomBox. It has been mentiond 205 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FreedomBox mentions (23)

  • Why I self host my servers (and what I've recently learned)
    Freedom Box is(was?) a pretty good system for making self hosting things accessible and easy. A couple of clicks was usually all it took. https://freedombox.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Dual system case, cooling 4-port 10G ethernet
    I'm trying to plan a server build & want two systems, preferably in one box, a firewall & a server with enough oomph for freedombox, a personal git repository, mastodon, & a few other things. Https://freedombox.org/ Https://joinmastodon.org/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Railroad: Single-user, selfhosted blog for I2P for Linux and Windows
    Is it possible to use this with Freedombox? I use a Raspberry Pi as my i2p router, the Pi Runs Freedombox but it doesn't have a GUI installed, I just connect to it from other devices. How would I use the editor for example? Source: over 2 years ago
  • What are some common things that are overlooked when it comes to privacy?
    Instead of commercial cloud-services, try something like Tailscale or ZeroTier for VPN across your devices, and run a https://freedombox.org/ on that network. The lesser but still decent option is to use client-side encrypted services like Proton Calendar and SpiderOak cloud backups. Source: over 2 years ago
  • My Health Record: after 12 years and more than $2bn, hardly anyone is using digital service
    Yeah, if I still lived in Oz I’d be running a [freedom box)(https://freedombox.org/). It galls me that we have to treat the government as an Orwellian malevolent stalker. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem mentions (205)

  • Setting up WSL Ubuntu on your Windows Machine (Laptops| PCs)
    Upgrade to WSL2: Checkout the official documentation https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/install .... I observed from several installation that install WSL1 then upgrading to WSL2 saves one the stress of unnecessary troubleshooting but if install WSL2 works out for you at first trail....fine. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Configuring LazyVim and Python on Windows with WSL
    Reference: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/install. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Bash vs. Zsh: Key differences and when to use each
    Bash is the default on most Linux distros and can also be used on MacOS and Windows via the Windows Subsystem for Linux(WSL). - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • A Practical Guide to Translating & Localizing Your Web App: Using i18n and Lingo.dev
    To fix this issue, you should try running the command inside the Git Bash terminal or Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL). Ensure that you run it from your project directory. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Master Shell Scripting – Zero to Interview Ready!🔥
    Any Prerequisites? If you are a window user, you need to setup WSL for using Linux on your system. You can explore more about it here. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing FreedomBox and SSH of Windows' Linux subsystem, you can also consider the following products

YunoHost - YunoHost is a Debian GNU/Linux based distribution packaged with free software that automates the...

VS Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft

Libre.sh - Implementation of IndieHosters Network based on CoreOS

Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) - Learn more about how the Windows Subsystem for Linux works.

Sandstorm.io - Take control of your web by running your own personal cloud server with Sandstorm.

Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS