Based on our record, .NET should be more popular than Fossil. It has been mentiond 46 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Feedback to author: The diagram and explanation took a beat longer than normal to scan, since this buries a bit that it's not about the beautiful source control system called fossil shipped as a composition of modules: https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki Great diagrams, so of course that's the first thing a reader will skim. People biuld things based on git all the time, the diagram looks like... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
There are (all too rare) tools that back those objects with git as well. And there's always fossil ... https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki But it's not git. :-(. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
I don't think git should be the infrastructure of collaboration. It's good for long-lived artifacts, but isn't good for discussion, for rights management, ... Fossil (https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki) is of course better, but if git must remain, I believe the base infrastructure should be the mailing list. Patches, branches and releases can live inside a mailing list, it is naturally built for... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
Have you spent much time using Fossil? https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
> To make things more complicated, they also use their a relatively niche version management system instead of git. Which would complicate making contributions (if they accepted them). The Fossil VCS actually has a page explaining why it was created, instead of just using Git: https://sqlite.org/whynotgit.html Honestly, a lot of those points make sense, especially how Git is perhaps a little bit more complex and... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
We never quite lost it, just the startup SV culture lost sight of them, https://www.embarcadero.com/products/delphi https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/ https://www.outsystems.com/ Or in the game industry, https://docs.unrealengine.com/5.2/en-US/blueprints-visual-scripting-in-unreal-engine/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
I want to create graphics easily like found on this website" https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/. Source: 12 months ago
C# is really easy to learn and has a similar syntax with other languages. Take a look here Learn .NET. Source: 12 months ago
C# is one of multiple languages for programming with "dotnet" (also spelled ".NET" or ".Net"). The dotnet website should be your main stop for getting started. Source: about 1 year ago
C# is a language designed by Microsoft and is often used in business applications and is supported on many platforms, including mobile and IOT. It can be used on Linux, Apple, IOS, Android and can even run on a raspberry pi (ARM). The dotnet (Framework part is the old windows only version) is just the runtime engine of C# / F# and Visual Basic. So to answer your question, if it is worth it to learn, it's a good... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.
WPMU DEV - WPMU offers WordPress Plugins, WordPress Themes, WordPress Multisite and BuddyPress Plugins and Themes.
GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
MAMP - MAMP is the abbreviation for Macintosh, Apache, MySQL, and PHP. It is a reliable application with its four components that allows you to access the local PHP server as well as the database server (SQL).
Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.
Firefox Developer Edition - Built for those who build the Web. The only browser made for developers.