Software Alternatives & Reviews

Fossil VS Hugo

Compare Fossil VS Hugo and see what are their differences

Fossil logo Fossil

Simple, high-reliability, distributed software configuration management

Hugo logo Hugo

Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.
  • Fossil Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-23
  • Hugo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21

Fossil videos

Why Is EVERYONE Giving This Watch 5 Stars?! - A Brutally Honest Fossil Watch Review

More videos:

  • Review - What Happened To Fossil Watches?
  • Tutorial - Fossil watch real vs. fake review. How to tell counterfeit Fossil wrist watch

Hugo videos

Hugo - Movie Review by Chris Stuckmann

More videos:

  • Review - Hugo - A Love Letter to Cinema
  • Review - Hugo Review (funny movie review)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Fossil and Hugo)
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
Blogging
0 0%
100% 100
Git
100 100%
0% 0
Static Site Generators
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Fossil and Hugo. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Fossil and Hugo

Fossil Reviews

We have no reviews of Fossil yet.
Be the first one to post

Hugo Reviews

10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Source: www.netlify.com
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Hugo does something similar with its menu templates. You can define menu links in your Hugo site config, and even add useful properties that Hugo understands, like weighting. Here’s a definition of the menu above in config.yaml:
Top Static Site Generators For 2019
Hugo is a static site generator which is also very popular which is proven by over 30,000 stars on GitHub right now. Hugo is based on the Go programming language which is great if you have already gained some knowledge of Go. Hugo claims that it is the fastest framework for building websites. In fact Hugo comes with an ultra-fast build process and makes building static...
Source: medium.com
Hugo or Jekyll? 6 Factors You Should Know
Hugo is blazingly fast. We previously released a post on the performance of Hugo and Jekyll and compared the two. Hugo was the clear winner.
Source: forestry.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hugo seems to be a lot more popular than Fossil. While we know about 354 links to Hugo, we've tracked only 23 mentions of Fossil. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Fossil mentions (23)

  • Htmx Is Composable?
    Feedback to author: The diagram and explanation took a beat longer than normal to scan, since this buries a bit that it's not about the beautiful source control system called fossil shipped as a composition of modules: https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki Great diagrams, so of course that's the first thing a reader will skim. People biuld things based on git all the time, the diagram looks like... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Cloudflare API Down
    There are (all too rare) tools that back those objects with git as well. And there's always fossil ... https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki But it's not git. :-(. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Git Based SDLC
    I don't think git should be the infrastructure of collaboration. It's good for long-lived artifacts, but isn't good for discussion, for rights management, ... Fossil (https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki) is of course better, but if git must remain, I believe the base infrastructure should be the mailing list. Patches, branches and releases can live inside a mailing list, it is naturally built for... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • A beginner's guide to Git version control
    Have you spent much time using Fossil? https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • SQLite builds for WASI since 3.41.0
    > To make things more complicated, they also use their a relatively niche version management system instead of git. Which would complicate making contributions (if they accepted them). The Fossil VCS actually has a page explaining why it was created, instead of just using Git: https://sqlite.org/whynotgit.html Honestly, a lot of those points make sense, especially how Git is perhaps a little bit more complex and... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
View more

Hugo mentions (354)

  • Building static websites
    At one point though I realized there is a scaling problem with my build minutes. I knew that golang has considerably faster builds and in my case the easy fix is swapping over to Hugo. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
  • Creating excerpts in Astro
    This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview
    We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Starlight vs. Docusaurus for building documentation
    In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Top 5 Open-Source Documentation Development Platforms of 2024
    Hugo is a popular static site generator specifically designed to create websites and documentation lightning-fast. Its minimalist approach, emphasis on speed, and ease of use have made it popular among developers, technical writers, and anybody looking to construct high-quality websites without the complexity of typical CMS platforms. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Fossil and Hugo, you can also consider the following products

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

Mercurial SCM - Mercurial is a free, distributed source control management tool.

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

Git - Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.