Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Flutter VS F#

Compare Flutter VS F# and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Flutter logo Flutter

Build beautiful native apps in record time 🚀

F# logo F#

F# is a mature, open source, cross-platform, functional-first programming language.
  • Flutter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-14
  • F# Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-15

We recommend LibHunt F# for discovery and comparisons of trending F# projects.

Flutter features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Development
    Flutter allows you to create applications that run on multiple platforms, including iOS, Android, web, and desktop, using a single codebase, thereby significantly reducing development time and effort.
  • Hot Reload
    The Hot Reload feature allows developers to see the results of their code changes almost instantly without a full restart, boosting productivity and making the debugging process more efficient.
  • Rich Set of Pre-Built Widgets
    Flutter offers a comprehensive collection of customizable widgets that follow modern design guidelines, allowing developers to build attractive and consistent UIs effortlessly.
  • Performance
    Flutter applications are compiled directly to native ARM code, which can result in superior performance comparable to native applications.
  • Strong Community Support
    As an open-source project, Flutter has a large and active community, providing abundant resources, third-party libraries, and plugins to accelerate development.

Possible disadvantages of Flutter

  • Large App Size
    Flutter apps tend to have a larger file size compared to native apps, which could be a concern for users with limited storage space or slow internet connections.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    While Flutter is growing rapidly, its ecosystem is not yet as mature as those of more established frameworks, meaning that certain third-party libraries, tools, and plugins might be lacking or underdeveloped.
  • Platform-Specific APIs
    Despite its cross-platform capabilities, Flutter may require the development of custom platform-specific code for certain functionalities, which could complicate the development process.
  • Learning Curve
    Flutter uses Dart, a programming language that is less commonly used compared to JavaScript, Java, or Swift, which may result in a steeper learning curve for new developers.
  • State Management Complexity
    Managing states effectively in large applications can be challenging in Flutter, potentially leading to convoluted code if not handled properly.

F# features and specs

  • Functional Programming Paradigm
    F# primarily supports functional programming, which promotes immutability and first-class functions, leading to more predictable and maintainable code.
  • Interoperability
    F# provides seamless interoperability with .NET libraries and languages like C#, allowing developers to leverage a vast ecosystem of tools and libraries.
  • Conciseness
    F# code tends to be concise and expressive, reducing boilerplate code and enhancing readability.
  • Type Inference
    Powerful type inference capabilities reduce the need for explicit type annotations, making the code easier to write and refactor.
  • Asynchronous Programming
    F# provides robust support for asynchronous programming, enabling the creation of responsive applications and efficient I/O handling.
  • Community and Resources
    An active community and wealth of online resources provide support and facilitate learning through forums, tutorials, and documentation.
  • Multi-Paradigm
    Despite its functional core, F# also supports imperative and object-oriented programming, offering flexibility to developers.

Possible disadvantages of F#

  • Learning Curve
    For developers coming from imperative or object-oriented backgrounds, the functional programming paradigm in F# can present a steep learning curve.
  • IDE and Tooling
    Although F# is integrated into Visual Studio, the overall tooling and IDE support for F# is not as mature as for more established languages like C#.
  • Market Demand
    The demand for F# skillsets in the job market is comparatively lower than for more mainstream languages, potentially affecting career opportunities.
  • Performance Overhead
    While generally efficient, certain operations in F# may incur performance overhead due to the functional aspects and abstractions, especially when not optimized.
  • Library Support
    Although F# can access the .NET library ecosystem, it has a relatively smaller number of libraries and frameworks specifically designed for it compared to languages like Python or JavaScript.
  • Niche Language
    F# is often considered a niche language, which can lead to a smaller community and fewer resources compared to more popular languages.

Flutter videos

beginning of flutter youtube channel

F# videos

F# Software Foundation Year in Review

More videos:

  • Review - F# Blues Harp Review
  • Review - F# base Bhavika flute review by Dhyey patel ji

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Flutter and F#)
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Programming Language
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
OOP
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Flutter and F#. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Flutter and F#

Flutter Reviews

Explore 9 Top Eclipse Alternatives for 2024
With Flutter 2’s release in 2021, developers now have full support to construct intuitive Windows apps, marking another milestone in Flutter’s inclusive cross-platform vision.
Source: aircada.com
Top 10 Flutter Alternatives for Cross-Platform App Development
So, above are some of the Flutter alternatives you can consider for your upcoming projects. To make the right selection, you should analyze the characteristics of your applications, which will help you make the most appropriate selection. You can also get in touch with a Flutter development company to go with the right option.
Top 5 Flutter Alternatives for Cross-Platform Development
Qt’s native capabilities contribute to its good app performance and size. Compared to Flutter, Flutter apps tend to be larger than native apps. However, the framework’s features and language are designed to boost Flutter app performance.
Source: www.miquido.com
Exploring 15 Powerful Flutter Alternatives
Beyond official Flutter built by Google, Flutter Community is an open-source fork-adding capability and component. Flutter Community has specifically expanded device testing coverage beyond Google’s in-house capabilities. With contributors volunteering devices for testing worldwide, Flutter Community tracks compatibility across over 3000 device variants spanning multiple...
Top 10 Android Studio Alternatives For App Development
Flutter is a framework that is used by stack developers to build multi-platform apps from a single codebase. It is an open-source project which was developed by Google to build app UI.

F# Reviews

We have no reviews of F# yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Flutter seems to be a lot more popular than F#. While we know about 363 links to Flutter, we've tracked only 21 mentions of F#. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Flutter mentions (363)

  • 🚀 iOS vs Android Development: Which One Should You Learn First? (The Truth No One Tells You!)
    🎯 Still confused? Start with Flutter, which lets you build both iOS & Android apps with one codebase! Check it out here. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Writing and Reading NFC in Flutter | Comprehensive Guide
    Flutter provides robust support for NFC through third-party packages, making implementation seamless. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Building cost-effective AI-driven MVPs with Flutter development services
    Flutter is a powerful, popular, and open-source platform known for its developer-friendly environment, wide ecosystem of libraries, extensions and other tools. A key feature of Flutter app development services is that it promotes the development of cross-platform applications without needing to build or write two or three different codebases. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • How to Build a CRUD Application Using Flutter & Strapi
    In this tutorial, I'll show you how to build a full-featured mobile CRUD application with Flutter and Strapi 5. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • React v19 has been released
    I don't agree but if you're looking for something that renderers everything in a canvas it's called Flutter https://flutter.dev/, and strangely it's made by Google, even though Flutter's success means the end of scraping the web for search. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
View more

F# mentions (21)

  • What's New in F# 9
    It's an open-source project with its own F# Software Foundation. If Microsoft drops it, I think it would continue. https://fsharp.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Rust panics under the hood, and implementing them in .NET
    Before Rich made Clojure for the JVM, he wrote dotLisp[1] for the CLR. Not long after Clojure was JVM hosted, it was also CLR hosted[2]. One of my first experiences with ML was F#[3], a ML variant that targets the CLR. These all predate the MIT licensed .net, but prior to that there was mono, which was also MIT licensed. 1: https://dotlisp.sourceforge.net/dotlisp.htm 2: https://github.com/clojure/clojure-clr. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Roc – A fast, friendly, functional language
    Oh yeah. A key hindrance of F# is that MS treats it like a side project even though it's probably their secret weapon, and a lot of the adopters are dotnet coders who already know the basics so the on-boarding is less than ideal. https://fsharp.org/ is the best place to actually start. https://fsharpforfunandprofit.com/ is the standard recommendation from there but there's finally some good youtube and other... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
    Naturally I’d recommend using a better language such as ReScript or Elm or PureScript or F#‘s Fable + Elmish, but “React” is the king right now and people perceive TypeScript as “less risky” for jobs/hiring, so here we are. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • I am a ChatGPT bot - Ask me anything #2
    Are you really a bot? Yes, I'm a small F# program that glues together the public API's provided by Reddit and OpenAI. I was created by /u/brianberns. You can find my source code here. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Flutter and F#, you can also consider the following products

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

Elixir - Dynamic, functional language designed for building scalable and maintainable applications

import.io - Import. io helps its users find the internet data they need, organize and store it, and transform it into a format that provides them with the context they need.

C++ - Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation

Ionic Framework - A front-end SDK to develop applications with HTML5 , CSS3 and JavaScript.

Clojure - Clojure is a dynamic, general-purpose programming language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming.