Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

Flow Type VS Webpack

Compare Flow Type VS Webpack and see what are their differences

PAQATO
The PAQATO After-Sales Experience Platform is the growth driver that makes online stores successful for tomorrow. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Flow Type logo Flow Type

A Static Type Checker for JavaScript

Webpack logo Webpack

Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.
  • Flow Type Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-26
  • Webpack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-13

Flow Type videos

No Flow Type videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Webpack videos

+ Add

Learn Webpack - Full Tutorial for Beginners

More videos:

  • Review - Core Concepts of Webpack
  • Review - Learn Webpack Pt. 6: Cache Busting and Plugins

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Flow Type and Webpack)

Flow Type

Webpack

Programming Language
100 100%
Programming Language
0% 0
Web Application Bundler
0 0%
Web Application Bundler
100% 100
Programming
100 100%
Programming
0% 0
JS Build Tools
0 0%
JS Build Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Flow Type and Webpack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Flow Type and Webpack

Flow Type Reviews

We have no reviews of Flow Type yet.
Be the first one to post

Webpack Reviews

Rollup v. Webpack v. Parcel
Tool Prod Build Time One Prod Build Time Two Prod Build Time Three Prod Build Time Avg Parcel 738.509 s 35.364 s 35.592 s 269.82 avg s Rollup 0.712 s 0.665 s 0.714 s 0.697 avg s Webpack 3.636 s 3.805 s 4.305 s 3.915 avg s
Source: x-team.com
If you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!
document.body.className = document.body.className.replace(/(^|\s)is-noJs(\s|$)/, "$1is-js$2")HomepageHomepageJavascriptBecome a memberSign inGet startedIf you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!And how to hit the ground running with Parcel.Ibrahim ButtBlockedUnblockFollowFollowingMar 16, 2018Click here to share this article on LinkedIn »Zero...
Source: medium.com
First impressions with Parcel JS
From first impressions and experience, my take currently would be as follows. Webpack is generally going to be more flexible. It also places a bit more power in the developers hands to make bundling happen exactly as desired. That isn’t to say you shouldn’t use Parcel though. Where Parcel excels is the fact you don’t configure it. You will still need to configure plugins for...
Source: codeburst.io
Parcel vs webpack - Jakob Lind
Webpack is the stable choice. You will not get fired for picking webpack. But you don’t get as much stuff for free such as optimized bundles, and code splitting.
Source: blog.jakoblind.no

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Webpack should be more popular than Flow Type. It has been mentiond 220 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Flow Type mentions (24)

  • Is TypeScript actually worth It?
    I love JS, but I want types. I don't want TypeScript though, but I'll do it if the job requires it. Has anyone tried building in flow for a large project? This was facebook's static type checking approach: https://flow.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • How I improved my JS code with these 3 functions
    In my examples, I’ll use the Flow type system so that it’s easier to follow the idea. The code consists of two parts: a service API and a recommendation flow. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Guido van Rossum: Python and the Future of Programming | Lex Fridman Podcast #341
    You think we could try to make it such that people use JS + Flow the static type checker. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Front-end Guide
    The two biggest contenders in adding static types to JavaScript are Flow (by Facebook) and TypeScript (by Microsoft). As of date, there is no clear winner in the battle. For now, we have made the choice of using Flow. We find that Flow has a lower learning curve as compared to TypeScript and it requires relatively less effort to migrate an existing code base to Flow. Being built by Facebook, Flow has better... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Flow - a little language I've been working on
    Just FYI, Facebook has a JS dialect called Flow. There was a point in time that Flow and TypeScript were duking it out, but clearly TS has won. I think Flow is still used inside Facebook, but I don't think it has really caught on in the larger developer ecosystem. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

Webpack mentions (220)

  • Practical and Beginner friendly guide for speeding up your web-apps
    There are various tools available that manage the size of bundled assets. We are going to use the example of a popular and widely used bundler named Webpack, and practically look at many of the optimization techniques it offers. - Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
  • JS Toolbox 2024: Essential Picks for Modern Developers Series Overview
    In part 3 We jump into the world of bundlers, comparing webpack, esbuild, vite, and parcel 2. This section aims to guide developers through each bundler, focusing on their performance, compatibility, and ease of use. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Webpack: The Web Module Bundler
    Thats all about Webpack Basic, there are lots of feature of webpack, You can check here: https://webpack.js.org/. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How to improve page load speed and response times: A comprehensive guide
    Many web pages use CSS and JavaScript files to handle various features and styles. Each file, however, requires a separate HTTP request, which can slow down page loading. Concatenation comes into play here. It involves combining multiple CSS or JavaScript files into a single file. As a result, pages load faster, reducing the time spent requesting individual files. Gulp, Grunt, and Webpack are some of the tools... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Build a Vite 5 backend integration with Flask
    Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them.... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Flow Type and Webpack, you can also consider the following products

Typescript - TypeScript allows developers to compile a superset of JavaScript to plain JavaScript on any browser, host, or operating system.

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.

Firefox Developer Tools - Examine, edit, and debug HTML, CSS, and JavaScript on the desktop and on mobile.

rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.

JavaScript - Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions

Parcel - Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler

Loading...