FLATHUB VS Ceph
Compare FLATHUB VS Ceph and see what are their differences
Auto arrange all your app windows, whether on one screen or many with a single click!
featured
FLATHUB
Flatpak
Snapcraft
AppImageKit
Homebrew
pacman (package manager)
Synaptic
NixOS
Ceph
Minio
GlusterFS
StorPool
TrueNAS Core
PetaSAN
BeeGFS
XigmaNAS
FLATHUBBased on our record, FLATHUB seems to be a lot more popular than Ceph. While we know about 198 links to FLATHUB, we've tracked only 11 mentions of Ceph. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
There are a lot of third-party Linux apps built with GTK4/Libadwaita. If you just to to https://flathub.org and click on random apps a lot of them will use GTK. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
I would recommend taking a look at Flatpak. Source: 6 months ago
Flathub flatpak format apps/games for linux desktop, does not require any specific linux distribution just that flatpak is present on the system. Source: 8 months ago
Which X clients are these? You didn't name any so let's just look at some of the popular and recent flathub apps: https://flathub.org/ I see a lot of games, chat apps, text editors, photo apps, office apps. These all will work fine in XWayland and XQuartz. But also, it's relatively easy to get them running on Wayland natively. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
If you're worried about the potential of breaking things, I'd pick the Fedora Kinoite distro. Up to date gaming support, stable and extremely difficult to break. Install apps from Flathub using the built-in Discover software store and go nuts. Source: 8 months ago
Ceph stands out in storage technology, offering a scalable and reliable solution where traditional systems fall short. It supports object, block, and file storage in one system, adaptable for various environments including on-premises, cloud, or container-native setups. Key benefits include scalability, enabled by the CRUSH algorithm, allowing for expansion without typical downtime. This makes Ceph suitable for... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
With that being said, you better take a look at something more WAN optimized and more secure, like S3 storage. You can build the S3 storage (and gain immutability) using something like MinIO (https://min.io/) or Ceph (https://ceph.io/en/) or check out Object First Ootbi offerings - https://objectfirst.com/object-storage/ (I work for them). Source: 11 months ago
I believe Ceph [1] could be a good alternative. It can be self hosted and I believe some cloud providers also offer it. Here are some differences between S3 and Ceph [2]. [1] - https://ceph.io/en/ [2] - https://www.lightbitslabs.com/blog/ceph-storage/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Another option is a distributed Ceph cluster https://ceph.io/en/. Source: almost 2 years ago
There's also cool systems like https://ceph.io/en/ that could be efficient if willing to set up and learn. Source: almost 2 years ago
Flatpak - Flatpak is the new framework for desktop applications on Linux
Minio - Minio is an open-source minimal cloud storage server.
Snapcraft - Snaps are software packages that are simple to create and install.
GlusterFS - GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.
AppImageKit - Linux apps that run anywhere
StorPool - StorPool is designed from the ground up to provide cloud builders, shared hosting providers and MSPs with the most resource efficient storage software on the market.