Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Fancybox VS Underscore.js

Compare Fancybox VS Underscore.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Fancybox logo Fancybox

fancyapps.com - Fancy App Store

Underscore.js logo Underscore.js

Underscore is a utility-belt library for JavaScript that provides a lot of the functional...
  • Fancybox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-26
  • Underscore.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-12-17

Fancybox features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Fancybox offers a clean and intuitive interface that is easy for developers to integrate and for users to navigate, making it a popular choice for displaying images, videos, and other media content.
  • Responsive Design
    It is designed to be responsive, working seamlessly on various devices and screen sizes, which is essential for modern web applications.
  • Customizability
    Fancybox provides a range of customization options that allow developers to tailor its appearance and functionality to fit the specific needs of their projects.
  • Wide Range of Media Support
    The library supports a variety of media types such as images, videos, iframes, and HTML content, offering flexibility for different use cases.
  • Active Community and Support
    There is an active community and available documentation that provide support and resources for troubleshooting and enhancing the use of Fancybox.

Possible disadvantages of Fancybox

  • Potential Performance Issues
    Including Fancybox in a project might lead to increased load times, as it requires additional JavaScript and CSS files, which could affect site performance.
  • Limited Free Features
    The free version of Fancybox has limited features, which may not be sufficient for all users, pushing them towards the paid version for advanced functionalities.
  • Learning Curve for Customization
    While Fancybox is customizable, achieving complex customizations may require a deeper understanding of both the library and JavaScript, posing a challenge for beginners.
  • Browser Compatibility Issues
    Occasionally, developers might encounter compatibility issues with certain browsers, necessitating additional testing and debugging.

Underscore.js features and specs

  • Utility Functions
    Underscore.js provides a wealth of utility functions for common tasks such as map, reduce, filter, and more, making it easier to perform operations on arrays, objects, and collections.
  • Consistency
    The library offers a consistent API, which can make your code more readable and maintainable by providing a standard way to perform common programming tasks.
  • Lightweight
    Underscore.js is lightweight compared to full-featured libraries like Lodash, which can be a benefit if you're looking to minimize your application's footprint.
  • Browser Compatibility
    It supports a wide range of JavaScript environments, making it a good choice for projects that need to work across different browsers and Node.js.
  • Quick to Learn
    Easy to pick up for developers with even a basic understanding of JavaScript, due to its straightforward documentation and familiar function names.

Possible disadvantages of Underscore.js

  • Performance
    Underscore.js may not offer the same level of performance optimizations as more modern utility libraries like Lodash, potentially leading to slower execution for some tasks.
  • Limited Functionality
    While it covers many basic utility functions, its feature set is not as extensive as Lodash or other similar libraries, which provide a broader range of capabilities.
  • Outdated
    With the advent of ECMAScript 5 and later versions, many of the functions provided by Underscore.js are now natively available in JavaScript, reducing its necessity.
  • No Modularization
    Underscore does not support modular builds in the same way Lodash does, meaning you might end up including the entire library even if you only need a few functions.
  • Community and Maintenance
    While still maintained, Underscore.js has seen less active development and contributions compared to newer libraries, which could impact its long-term viability and support.

Fancybox videos

No Fancybox videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Underscore.js videos

Introduction to Underscore.JS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Fancybox and Underscore.js)
Web Frameworks
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Development Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Fancybox and Underscore.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Underscore.js seems to be a lot more popular than Fancybox. While we know about 23 links to Underscore.js, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Fancybox. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Fancybox mentions (2)

Underscore.js mentions (23)

  • JavaScript evolution: From Lodash and Underscore to vanilla
    Underscore was created by Jeremy Ashkenas (the creator of Backbone.js) in 2009 to provide a set of utility functions that JavaScript lacked at the time. It was also created to work with Backbone.js, but it slowly became a favorite among developers who needed utility functions that they could just call and get stuff done with without having to worry about the inner implementations and browser compatibility. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • KlongPy: High-Performance Array Programming in Python
    There was a step-change improvement for me when I tried expressing some JS patterns via `underscore.js` instead of procedurally: eg: http://underscorejs.org/#each Thinking of something as `each | map | filter | sum` is waaay less buggy than writing bespoke procedural code to do the same thing. No doubt there is a "cost" to it as well, but the _abstraction_ is valuable. Now, if there were a "compiler" which could... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • 100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
    Underscore.js: A utility library that offers a full set of functional programming helpers without extending any built-in JavaScript objects. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Mastering Node.js
    Underscore contains just about every core utility method you want. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • 8 NPM Packages for JavaScript Beginners [2024][+tutorials]
    Not too far behind is Underscore.js, another utility library that's all about enhancing your JavaScript mojo. Whether you're dealing with arrays, objects, or strings, Underscore has got something for you. It's like Lodash's sibling, offering similar functionalities but with its own flair. The choice between them is like picking between chocolate and vanilla - it really comes down to personal taste. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Fancybox and Underscore.js, you can also consider the following products

PhotoSwipe - JavaScript gallery, no dependencies.

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

ASP.NET - ASP.NET is a free web framework for building great Web sites and Web applications using HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

Magnific Popup - The greater part of Lightbox modules will completely preload a picture before showing it.

Babel - Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.