EJS VS JsRender

Compare EJS VS JsRender and see what are their differences

DocRaptor

As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

EJS

An open source JavaScript Template library.

JsRender

JsRender is a lightweight templating engine, highly extensible, without DOM or jQuery dependency.

Landing page //
2022-01-11

Landing page //
2023-10-07

EJS

Website: ejs.co
$ Details

Edit details

JsRender

Website: github.com
$ Details: -

Edit details

EJS features and specs

Simplicity
EJS is easy to learn and use, especially for developers who are already familiar with JavaScript. The syntax is straightforward, making it a good choice for quick application development.
JavaScript Integration
Since EJS templates are JavaScript files, you can seamlessly integrate JavaScript code, making it easy to manipulate data and use familiar JavaScript functions.
Lightweight
EJS is a lightweight template engine, which makes it an optimal choice for applications where performance and simplicity are critical.
Flexibility
Allows for the embedding of plain JavaScript within the templates, giving developers the flexibility to add logic directly in their HTML.
Partial Templates
Supports partials, which help to reuse code snippets across different views, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.
Server-Side Rendering
Supports server-side rendering, which can improve performance by reducing the amount of client-side processing needed.

Possible disadvantages of EJS

Limited Functionality
Compared to more feature-rich template engines like Handlebars or Pug, EJS offers limited functionalities which might be a drawback for large, complex projects.
Debugging
Debugging EJS templates can sometimes be challenging. Errors within templates can often be vague, making it difficult to trace the root cause.
Maintenance
Embedding a lot of JavaScript within templates can make the code harder to read and maintain, especially as the complexity of the application grows.
Performance Overhead
For very large and complex templates, EJS can introduce a performance overhead compared to more optimized template engines designed for high performance.
Community and Support
While EJS has a reasonable user base, the community and support may not be as extensive as more popular alternatives like React or Vue.js.

JsRender features and specs

Lightweight
JsRender is designed to be lightweight, adding minimal overhead to projects in terms of file size and performance.
Separation of Concerns
Provides a clean separation between HTML templating and JavaScript logic, facilitating modular code.
No Dependency Requirement
JsRender does not require jQuery or any other dependencies to function, allowing for more flexibility in integration with projects.
Extensibility
JsRender allows for extensibility, providing ways to add custom tags, helpers, and converters to enhance the templating capabilities.
Efficient Data Binding
Efficiently binds data to templates, allowing for enhanced performance in rendering dynamic content.

Possible disadvantages of JsRender

Limited Ecosystem
Compared to more popular templating languages and libraries, JsRender has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can impact available resources and support.
Learning Curve
Developers unfamiliar with JsRender's syntax and features may experience a learning curve, especially if coming from different templating languages.
Lack of Native Browser Integration
Unlike modern frontend frameworks, JsRender lacks native browser integration with features like components or reactive data binding out of the box.
Maintenance
Being less popular, there's a risk of slower updates and maintenance compared to more dominant players in the templating landscape.

EJS videos

+ Add

Kane Creek - Bestop Trail Review at EJS 2019

JsRender videos

No JsRender videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to EJS and JsRender)

EJS

JsRender

Javascript UI Libraries

78 78%

Javascript UI Libraries

22% 22

Tool

0 0%

Tool

100% 100

Development

73 73%

Development

27% 27

Front-End Frameworks

100 100%

Front-End Frameworks

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using EJS and JsRender. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, EJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

EJS mentions (26)

Next.js vs Express: What to Choose in 2025?
Express does not provide SEO benefits by default and would require additional configuration with tools like EJS (Embedded JavaScript) or Handlebars for server-side rendering. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Chapter 7: HTML part two
For a more robust approach, we'd probably need to install a templating language of some kind, such as Twig, EJS, Handlebars, Pug or Mustache (this is not a complete list!). Reading the documentation for posthtml-modules, you'll notice it doesn't mention package.json or any of the approaches we've used in this guide. Instead, the examples are in JavaScript and we've advised to add this to our Node application. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Web Components and SSR - 2024 Edition
Server-side Framework SSR is when you use a framework that runs the HTML templating logic entirely on the server to compose the HTML that will be rendered in the browser. These are frameworks like Ruby on Rails, ASP.Net, PHP, or even Node.js frameworks that use templating languages like Pug or EJS. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
How to Build an Application With Node.js
We need a templating engine to render HTML code in the browser using Node.js. We'll use ejs (Embedded JavaScript) for this tutorial but there are others such as Pug (formerly known as Jade) and Express Handlebar, which also render HTML on the server. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
Getting to the meat and potatoes of serverless recipe parsing with Amazon Bedrock
The tags is where you put the HTML you want Claude to read. The <%- document %> contained within is an ejs placeholder. More on this shortly. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago