Docker Registry 2.0 VS Mercurial SCM

Run your own container registry, build and host everything yourself, dont rely on others. Docker for example has a option for that but imo its very basic and limited. Harbor is more advanced but still not overly complicated. You could add build workers to that and automate your entire pipeline, but maybe for a single image thats overkill. But good to have those options in the future. Things to look at for example:... Source: 11 months ago

You can run your own docker registry if you want and push images to it: https://docs.docker.com/registry/. Source: 11 months ago

You can self-host your own. There is many alternatives but the official one you can find in these docs here Https://docs.docker.com/registry/. Source: 12 months ago

Yes, this one https://docs.docker.com/registry/. Source: 12 months ago

Operate a pull-through cache registry, like Artifactory or the open source reference Docker registry. This will allow you to pull images from Docker Hub less frequently, improving your chances of staying under the anonymous usage limit. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

Many people have asked me to write a blog post on my preference of Mercurial over Git and so far I've refused and will continue doing so for the foreseeable future. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

Mercurial Paris Conference 2023 is a professional and technical conference around mercurial scm, a free, distributed source control management tool. Source: over 1 year ago